Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Appeals Court holds that Second Amendment doesn't apply to illegals


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Appeals Court holds that Second Amendment doesn't apply to illegals Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Appeals Court holds that Second Amendment doesn't apply... - 5/8/2012 4:28:20 PM   
Iamsemisweet


Posts: 3651
Joined: 4/9/2011
From: The Great Northwest, USA
Status: offline
DENVER -- A federal appeals court has rejected an illegal immigrant's claim that the Second Amendment guarantees him the right to bear firearms.
Emmanuel Huitron-Guizar of Gillette, Wyo., had argued that the U.S. Constitution guarantees are guaranteed certain other rights to illegal aliens, such as the right to due process.
The Second Amendment provides that "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed," and Huitron-Guizar argued that he was part of "the people."But the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver ruled that Huitron-Guizar fell under the Gun Control Act of 1968, which forbids gun possession by nine classes of individuals, including illegal aliens. The court conceded that there is some argument about the meaning of "the people" and U.S. citizens, but found that Congress had lawfully exercised its power to distinguish between citizens and non-citizens."That Congress saw fit to exclude illegal aliens from carrying guns may indicate its belief, entitled to our respect, that such aliens, as a class, possess no such constitutional right," the court said.
Huitron-Guizar, 24, was born in Mexico, brought to Wyoming at the age of 3 and never obtained U.S. citizenship.
In March 2011, officers served a search warrant at his home and found a rifle, a 12-gauge semi-automatic shotgun and a semi-automatic pistol.
He entered a conditional guilty plea to being an illegal alien in possession of firearms transported or shipped in interstate commerce. He was sentenced to 18 months in prison and is to be deported thereafter.
Huitron-Guizar's attorney, Ronald Pretty, said Tuesday that he believed such cases involving constitutional definitions of "people" as opposed to "citizens" could end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.
The circuit court of appeals did find the Constitution did not clearly define U.S. citizenship.
"We know, for instance, that the founders' notion of citizenship was less rigid than ours, largely tied to the franchise, which itself was often based on little more than a brief period of residence and being a male with some capital," the panel noted.

_____________________________

Alice: But I don't want to go among mad people.
The Cat: Oh, you can't help that. We're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad.
Alice: How do you know I'm mad?
The Cat: You must be. Or you wouldn't have come here.
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Appeals Court holds that Second Amendment doesn't a... - 5/8/2012 4:55:50 PM   
Mupainurpleasure


Posts: 393
Joined: 4/12/2012
Status: offline
I had thought the constitution applied to goverment action on U.s. soil. I know habeus corpus used to. I cant see this standing if only because to let it do so menas the rest doesnt apply to them as well

(in reply to Iamsemisweet)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Appeals Court holds that Second Amendment doesn't a... - 5/8/2012 5:09:32 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
Being an illegal he had committed a crime this would mean he could not own a firearm. Overturning this would require abolishing immigration laws or laws that ban criminals from firearms ownership, quite possibly both.

< Message edited by BamaD -- 5/8/2012 5:11:43 PM >

(in reply to Mupainurpleasure)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Appeals Court holds that Second Amendment doesn't a... - 5/8/2012 5:31:24 PM   
lovmuffin


Posts: 3759
Joined: 9/28/2007
Status: offline
I'm curious why a search warrant was served ? Got any links ?

_____________________________

"Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank. Give a man a bank and he can rob the world." Unknown

"Long hair, short hair—what's the difference once the head's blowed off." - Farmer Yassir

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Appeals Court holds that Second Amendment doesn't a... - 5/8/2012 6:23:59 PM   
subrob1967


Posts: 4591
Joined: 9/13/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Being an illegal he had committed a crime this would mean he could not own a firearm. Overturning this would require abolishing immigration laws or laws that ban criminals from firearms ownership, quite possibly both.


That's only for those convicted of a felony, being illegal here is a misdemeanor.

_____________________________

http://www.extra-life.org/

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Appeals Court holds that Second Amendment doesn't a... - 5/8/2012 6:59:25 PM   
DarkSteven


Posts: 28072
Joined: 5/2/2008
Status: offline
Already felons are barred from owning guns. Stating that everyone should have them, including illegals, implies that illegals should have more rights than felons, which twists logic a bit.

_____________________________

"You women....

The small-breasted ones want larger breasts. The large-breasted ones want smaller ones. The straight-haired ones curl their hair, and the curly-haired ones straighten theirs...

Quit fretting. We men love you."

(in reply to subrob1967)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Appeals Court holds that Second Amendment doesn't a... - 5/8/2012 7:02:45 PM   
Iamsemisweet


Posts: 3651
Joined: 4/9/2011
From: The Great Northwest, USA
Status: offline
http://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/this_week/pdf/11-8051.pdf
quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

I'm curious why a search warrant was served ? Got any links ?



_____________________________

Alice: But I don't want to go among mad people.
The Cat: Oh, you can't help that. We're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad.
Alice: How do you know I'm mad?
The Cat: You must be. Or you wouldn't have come here.

(in reply to lovmuffin)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Appeals Court holds that Second Amendment doesn't a... - 5/8/2012 7:17:20 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
Who it applies to is pretty well spelled out here. Not much has changed really.


quote:

Article IV.

The better to secure and perpetuate mutual friendship and intercourse among the people of the different States in this Union, the free inhabitants of each of these States, paupers, vagabonds, and fugitives from justice excepted, shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several States; and the people of each State shall free ingress and regress to and from any other State, and shall enjoy therein all the privileges of trade and commerce, subject to the same duties, impositions, and restrictions as the inhabitants thereof respectively, provided that such restrictions shall not extend so far as to prevent the removal of property imported into any State, to any other State, of which the owner is an inhabitant; provided also that no imposition, duties or restriction shall be laid by any State, on the property of the United States, or either of them.

If any person guilty of, or charged with, treason, felony, or other high misdemeanor in any State, shall flee from justice, and be found in any of the United States, he shall, upon demand of the Governor or executive power of the State from which he fled, be delivered up and removed to the State having jurisdiction of his offense.

Full faith and credit shall be given in each of these States to the records, acts, and judicial proceedings of the courts and magistrates of every other State.


so if they want to "spell it out" for the rest of the historically challenged courts, there it is.

That and the most an immigrant can ever be is a United States 14th amendment citizen which has abridged privileges to a State Citizen.





_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Iamsemisweet)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Appeals Court holds that Second Amendment doesn't a... - 5/8/2012 7:21:31 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

Already felons are barred from owning guns. Stating that everyone should have them, including illegals, implies that illegals should have more rights than felons, which twists logic a bit.



now that part is unconstitutional.

even though there are supreme court rulings that the use of statutes by legislatures are not the end all in law the states still approach it from that aspect. It wont change till people wise up and realize their rights and that wont happen till there is a peanut counter up everyones butt.



_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to DarkSteven)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Appeals Court holds that Second Amendment doesn't a... - 5/8/2012 7:56:23 PM   
SternSkipper


Posts: 7546
Joined: 3/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:

Huitron-Guizar's attorney, Ronald Pretty, said Tuesday that he believed such cases involving constitutional definitions of "people" as opposed to "citizens" could end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.
The circuit court of appeals did find the Constitution did not clearly define U.S. citizenship.


I'm pretty sure that whatever bench you go in front of, "people" or "the people" means at a minimum someone with a lawful presence in the United States.
Not much more to say. It's been the law of the land for more than 40 years ... And here's who can't have guns:

Under the GCA, selling of firearms to certain categories of individuals is prohibited.

AS QUOTED FROM Section 922 Section D Bowleg 1-9

(d) It shall be unlawful for any person to sell or otherwise dispose of any firearm or ammunition to any person knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that such person - (1) is under indictment for, or has been convicted in any court of, a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year (2) is a fugitive from justice; (3) is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802)); (4) has been adjudicated as a mental defective or has been committed to any mental institution; (5) who, being an alien - (A) is illegally or unlawfully in the United States; or (B) except as provided in subsection (y)(2), has been admitted to the United States under a nonimmigrant visa (as that term is defined in section 101(a)(26) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(26))); (6) who (!2) has been discharged from the Armed Forces under dishonorable conditions; (7) who, having been a citizen of the United States, has renounced his citizenship; (8) is subject to a court order that restrains such person from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner of such person or child of such intimate partner or person, or engaging in other conduct that would place an intimate partner in reasonable fear of bodily injury to the partner or child, except that this paragraph shall only apply to a court order that - (A) was issued after a hearing of which such person received actual notice, and at which such person had the opportunity to participate; and (B)(i) includes a finding that such person represents a credible threat to the physical safety of such intimate partner or child; or (ii) by its terms explicitly prohibits the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against such intimate partner or child that would reasonably be expected to cause bodily injury; or (9) has been convicted in any court of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence.

Also last year an open letter was send to all gun dealers stating that it was the ATF's position that holders of medical marijuana cards made the prohibited individuals as well. So don't go whipping out the pot card when they ask for a second form of ID at the Walmart 8-).


_____________________________

Looking forward to The Dead Singing The National Anthem At The World Series.




Tinfoilers Swallow


(in reply to Iamsemisweet)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Appeals Court holds that Second Amendment doesn't a... - 5/8/2012 7:57:52 PM   
SternSkipper


Posts: 7546
Joined: 3/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:

so if they want to "spell it out" for the rest of the historically challenged courts, there it is.


Nothin about muppets, huh?

_____________________________

Looking forward to The Dead Singing The National Anthem At The World Series.




Tinfoilers Swallow


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Appeals Court holds that Second Amendment doesn't a... - 5/8/2012 8:04:10 PM   
OsideGirl


Posts: 14441
Joined: 7/1/2005
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Being an illegal he had committed a crime this would mean he could not own a firearm. Overturning this would require abolishing immigration laws or laws that ban criminals from firearms ownership, quite possibly both.


That's only for those convicted of a felony, being illegal here is a misdemeanor.


Only the first time., after that it's a felony.

That said....here in CA to buy a firearm requires a CA ID/DL, and a car registration or utility bill showing the same address followed by a DOJ background check. Illegal immigrants are not allowed to have DL or register car in CA. They wouldn't be able to fulfill the requirements to purchase a firearm legally.


_____________________________

Give a girl the right shoes and she will conquer the world. ~ Marilyn Monroe

The Accelerated Velocity of Terminological Inexactitude

(in reply to subrob1967)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Appeals Court holds that Second Amendment doesn't a... - 5/8/2012 8:04:32 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Being an illegal he had committed a crime this would mean he could not own a firearm. Overturning this would require abolishing immigration laws or laws that ban criminals from firearms ownership, quite possibly both.


That's only for those convicted of a felony, being illegal here is a misdemeanor.

Being illegal may only a misdemeanor but it is one which carries with it deportation. Also domectic disturbances are misdemeanors which bar people from firearms ownership by federal law since the mid 90's. Thus it is still grating rights to illegals that some citezens do not have.

(in reply to subrob1967)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Appeals Court holds that Second Amendment doesn't a... - 5/8/2012 8:06:38 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Being an illegal he had committed a crime this would mean he could not own a firearm. Overturning this would require abolishing immigration laws or laws that ban criminals from firearms ownership, quite possibly both.


That's only for those convicted of a felony, being illegal here is a misdemeanor.


Only the first time., after that it's a felony.

That said....here in CA to buy a firearm requires a CA ID/DL, and a car registration or utility bill showing the same address followed by a DOJ background check. Illegal immigrants are not allowed to have DL or register car in CA. They wouldn't be able to fulfill the requirements to purchase a firearm legally.


The federal form for instant background check ask if you are a US citezen lying on that form is a felony.

< Message edited by BamaD -- 5/8/2012 8:09:25 PM >

(in reply to OsideGirl)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Appeals Court holds that Second Amendment doesn't a... - 5/8/2012 8:16:39 PM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline
To semisweet, Do you really think that people in this Country illigally should be able to own firearms ? The word illigal actually has a meaning..

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Appeals Court holds that Second Amendment doesn't a... - 5/8/2012 8:19:30 PM   
OsideGirl


Posts: 14441
Joined: 7/1/2005
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Being an illegal he had committed a crime this would mean he could not own a firearm. Overturning this would require abolishing immigration laws or laws that ban criminals from firearms ownership, quite possibly both.


That's only for those convicted of a felony, being illegal here is a misdemeanor.


Only the first time., after that it's a felony.

That said....here in CA to buy a firearm requires a CA ID/DL, and a car registration or utility bill showing the same address followed by a DOJ background check. Illegal immigrants are not allowed to have DL or register car in CA. They wouldn't be able to fulfill the requirements to purchase a firearm legally.


The federal form for instant background check ask if you are a US citezen lying on that form is a felony.

Exactly. I don't know about all states, but in CT and CA, I had to go through background checks which confirmed my identity and any past criminal activity. If someone cannot meet the requirements, they're not entitled to own a firearm. Signing on that dotted line says, "I hearby swear the information given has been truthful...."

< Message edited by OsideGirl -- 5/8/2012 8:20:29 PM >


_____________________________

Give a girl the right shoes and she will conquer the world. ~ Marilyn Monroe

The Accelerated Velocity of Terminological Inexactitude

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Appeals Court holds that Second Amendment doesn't a... - 5/8/2012 8:34:14 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Being an illegal he had committed a crime this would mean he could not own a firearm. Overturning this would require abolishing immigration laws or laws that ban criminals from firearms ownership, quite possibly both.


That's only for those convicted of a felony, being illegal here is a misdemeanor.

Being illegal may only a misdemeanor but it is one which carries with it deportation. Also domectic disturbances are misdemeanors which bar people from firearms ownership by federal law since the mid 90's. Thus it is still grating rights to illegals that some citezens do not have.



A constitution is a contract with the gub.

"free" as in "UNenfranchised" people have the most rights. That is people with no contracts, contracts treaties, constitutions ALWAYS forfeit rights.

No ones rights come from a constitution, they are antecedent to ANY constitution EVER made. I posted the supreme court cases stating that.

If you look at the many crests you will see the collar and chains symbolizing enslavement to the franchise. be it uk or us

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Appeals Court holds that Second Amendment doesn't a... - 5/8/2012 8:40:09 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

quote:

so if they want to "spell it out" for the rest of the historically challenged courts, there it is.


Nothin about muppets, huh?



unlawful for any person

Of all the hundreds if not thousands of people I know, I have yet to count more than 4 people who can tell me the variants of that word and its full historical to present application.

Technically an unborn child is not a legal "person", nor is an alien.

put that in your pipe.

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to SternSkipper)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Appeals Court holds that Second Amendment doesn't a... - 5/8/2012 10:07:49 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
No , of course not I think you were responding to someone else.
quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

To semisweet, Do you really think that people in this Country illigally should be able to own firearms ? The word illigal actually has a meaning..



< Message edited by BamaD -- 5/8/2012 10:08:13 PM >

(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Appeals Court holds that Second Amendment doesn't a... - 5/8/2012 10:16:50 PM   
SternSkipper


Posts: 7546
Joined: 3/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:

unlawful for any person

Of all the hundreds if not thousands of people I know, I have yet to count more than 4 people who can tell me the variants of that word and its full historical to present application.

Technically an unborn child is not a legal "person", nor is an alien.

put that in your pipe.


I no longer smoke... and frankly I heard the unborn produce a hash smoke.
So I guess you're saying that we'll be going to to the supreme court to ask the question "Do Muppets enjoy personhood?".

_____________________________

Looking forward to The Dead Singing The National Anthem At The World Series.




Tinfoilers Swallow


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Appeals Court holds that Second Amendment doesn't apply to illegals Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094