fucktoyprincess -> RE: What is it about eastern european D/s that they can play with models in an open city? (5/10/2012 6:10:29 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Karmastic quote:
ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess These look like they were shot in public spaces to me, but I think I agree with graceadieu that some of these shots look like they were done in a controlled area. I, personally, didn't see children passerbys in these scenes. If there were, then clearly, the standards for what children can see is different in these countries. It did seem that actual oral/vaginal sex (i.e., real male penis inside) was all in slightly more "private" spaces within the outdoors (I didn't see a bunch of people watching the actors have sex). Penetrative play with a dildo seems to fall under a different category, as that type of play seemed to occur with unsuspecting people (or extras) walking by. But the nudity, being bound in public, being led on a leash all seem to be occurring in public spaces (although it is impossible to tell if the area was controlled - even perhaps by signs warning people that a porn shoot was being filmed). I'm not sure what the privacy laws are in these countries, but do they have the right to film a passerby as the walk past, and not have to get a signed release from them? I'm not sure everyone would be happy to be in a porn film as a passerby, even in a situation like this (especially depending on what you do professionally) - so this is also making me think there had to at least be signs up somewhere letting people know what was going on and that they were given their tacit consent to be in the film if they remained present in the area. I don't know. Maybe they don't care. Truly hard to say. i usually agree with you, but i really doubt they posted signs. this is hit and run shooting. get a shot, move on, before you get rousted by the coppers. and nudity is much more accepted elsewhere. the bus scene did seem extreme, but nothing a quick $20 to the driver couldn't handle. and did you notice, people were taking pictures. This is fair, but are there not any laws on capturing people's images and using them for profit without their consent? I thought even bystanders had to be aware they were in a film - and I would think that the fact that it was a porn film for distribution (and not just someone's private vacation video) would make a difference. I don't claim to know - I just would have thought there would be some rules about that. I also didn't see any children as bystanders (did I just not see them?) I find it really odd that you could be out in public in a large city and that there would just be no children at all. Something about that didn't ring true to me. Again, I could be wrong. Or maybe the rules about what children can see is different there. All I can say is that if you are filming in New York good luck with being in a public place here in the daytime and not having children in strollers as bystanders. And I'm quite sure nudity in front of a child is illegal here. (And by nudity, I mean just nudity - I don't mean sexual acts).
|
|
|
|