RE: Rebekah Brooks charged by police (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message

FullCircle -> RE: Rebekah Brooks charged by police (5/19/2012 9:23:02 AM)

She did allegedly expose a horse to neglect.



mnottertail -> RE: Rebekah Brooks charged by police (5/19/2012 9:24:30 AM)

It was an offer the horse was unable to refuse.



FullCircle -> RE: Rebekah Brooks charged by police (5/19/2012 9:27:20 AM)

[:D]

Yeah, I don't trust horses I hear they don't wash their hands after going to the toilet, just like the upper classes.



Moonhead -> RE: Rebekah Brooks charged by police (5/19/2012 9:30:42 AM)

If you keep all this horse talk up gents, you'll have mister Illeism banging on about Rebekah as a ponygirl.
(And nobody wants that...)



misterraymond -> RE: Rebekah Brooks charged by police (5/19/2012 9:37:41 AM)

quote:

Rebekah did not expose her destroying of evidence.
Or the phone hacking that started this kerfuffle.
OR NI's paying off of police sources.
Or anything else, really.


Not proven.



misterraymond -> RE: Rebekah Brooks charged by police (5/19/2012 9:39:30 AM)

quote:

She did allegedly expose a horse to neglect.


This is below the belt, not know to Master, the allegedly expose a horse to neglect, its the allegedly bit Master does not like.

This is new news, for Master, must trot over to Churchill and sniff around.



misterraymond -> RE: Rebekah Brooks charged by police (5/19/2012 9:40:35 AM)

quote:

It was an offer the horse was unable to refuse.


Oh to be an horse.



mnottertail -> RE: Rebekah Brooks charged by police (5/19/2012 9:41:29 AM)

that is carte blanche to refer to one as mr ed.  you are part of one, certainly.



misterraymond -> RE: Rebekah Brooks charged by police (5/19/2012 9:41:36 AM)

quote:

just like the upper classes


Master thought they wore gloves. White gloves .



Moonhead -> RE: Rebekah Brooks charged by police (5/19/2012 9:41:56 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: misterraymond

quote:

Rebekah did not expose her destroying of evidence.
Or the phone hacking that started this kerfuffle.
OR NI's paying off of police sources.
Or anything else, really.


Not proven.

So you can find some evidence that she's tried to expose any of News International's recent naughtiness, then?



misterraymond -> RE: Rebekah Brooks charged by police (5/19/2012 9:43:29 AM)

quote:

ponygirl.


Please, ponygirl.

do you know I have actually got a long heavy red tail that would absolutely suit her.

And a little trap, yes Saturday is getting exciting at long last.



misterraymond -> RE: Rebekah Brooks charged by police (5/19/2012 9:46:33 AM)

quote:

naughtiness


THis Master does not know what that means, naughtiness

and for Rebekah this Master only wishes.....??



misterraymond -> RE: Rebekah Brooks charged by police (5/19/2012 9:48:09 AM)

quote:

that is carte blanche to refer to one as mr ed. you are part of one, certainly.


There is no value



mnottertail -> RE: Rebekah Brooks charged by police (5/19/2012 9:50:00 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: misterraymond
There is no value


You needn't alert us to that which is prima facie.



Moonhead -> RE: Rebekah Brooks charged by police (5/19/2012 10:08:14 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: misterraymond

quote:

ponygirl.


Please, ponygirl.

do you know I have actually got a long heavy red tail that would absolutely suit her.

And a little trap, yes Saturday is getting exciting at long last.

Told you, chaps...



misterraymond -> RE: Rebekah Brooks charged by police (5/23/2012 4:55:28 PM)

Moonhead, have I been caught out, red handed so to say,

Rebekah will certainly be the platform of a great movie, and Master is quite sure the film makers finances will not end up in the red, this will be a box office hit, and nightly performances in the Houses of Parliment.

Red is a lucky colour do you not think.



Moonhead -> RE: Rebekah Brooks charged by police (5/24/2012 4:18:41 AM)

Not for Rebekah: she'd look pretty bad in red. Most redheads do. [;)]



misterraymond -> RE: Rebekah Brooks charged by police (5/28/2012 2:27:31 AM)

Today Blair is talking about the relationship between politicians and the press, at the Leveson Inquiry.

As it is 25 minutes into dialogue he tells the inquiry that he decided in the 1990s he was going to "manage" the power of the press rather than "confront it".

Exactly but how did he manage our Rebekah, what is exciting so early in the dialogue is that Tonys famous hand gestures are already in full dramatic flow.

Conducting an orchestra playing "lady in Red"



misterraymond -> RE: Rebekah Brooks charged by police (5/28/2012 2:28:53 AM)

quote:

Not for Rebekah: she'd look pretty bad in red. Most redheads do.


You are so correct, Black would be better.



misterraymond -> RE: Rebekah Brooks charged by police (5/28/2012 5:47:33 AM)

Well Tony Blair is one cool dude, this Master likes him a little more these days, in dialogue about 11:05 today he was saying Quote:"Brooks 'not the decision maker"., unQUOTE, look after Rebekah and she will look after you, its interesting what Tony may be intimating here.

Tony Blair says that while he was close to Rebekah Brooks during his time as British prime minister that was not the crucial relationship as she did not control the editorial line of The Sun, Rebekah edited the Sun, Tony went onto say "Bluntly the decision maker was not Rebekah Brooks," thus it is crystal clear Tony Blair means Rupert Murdoch was,but how .

As the Leavson Inquiry breaks for Lunch Rebekah as been mentioned little by this gallant man, honourable and dashing with hand gestures to make a race course bookie seem an amature, Tony appears very attentive to Rebekah and very chivalrous as indeed an ex-prime Minister of Britain , should be...................????



Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875