Aswad -> RE: Why Atheism Scares People (5/20/2012 9:22:49 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus I don't feel compelled to help everyone, though I do what I can. And I live the adventure free of guidance from above. I imagine this is true of God, too, on both counts. [:D] My point wasn't to criticize, but rather that intervening is a complicated and demanding thing that each must decide for his/her/its self how to handle, and how much time and effort to sink into. What passes for omnipotence to a sheepherder in the Middle East millenia ago may not be what constitutes actual omnipotence, and a rational inquiry into religion is probably going to have to give up on establishing a neat package of answers. We exist. We live. That's enough love for me. I'd like more, of course. But whether chance or will gave me this reality and a place in it, I'm happy about that. Consider it the anthropic principle turned into a religious one: I believe this universe exists because of a love of life and liberty existing somewhere in some form. Perhaps, but not necessarily, in a conscious entity. And that this sets for us a good example of a set of interlocking cardinal values; life and liberty as something to love, even if and when you're taking it away (e.g. for food). Assuming for a moment that my unsubstantiated belief holds (it's unprovable, so humor me), then isn't the existence of life and liberty enough to reciprocate that love, and a thing well worth celebrating? Without a reality in which to experience, we would know no suffering, but also know no life or liberty. And I can't conceive of a viable reality without suffering in which one could have life and liberty in any meaningful sense, although I don't exclude the possibility, of course. Perhaps I'm simply constructing some endpoint for my appreciation of these things, but there's the top of my 'pantheon', the irreducible core assumption. Scientifically speaking, of course, there's no evidence and my belief is untestable. And, again scientifically speaking, high energy physics points at a significant likelihood that the observable universe will flicker out of existence with no warning at some point in the future, maybe tomorrow, maybe in billions of years. The search for Higgs currently bounds its energy into the range where a vacuum metastability event is plausible, but not a given. A result of that would, of course, be the elimination of all life throughout the observable universe, without the possiblity that life as we know it could reoccur. I don't fear death, but I certainly love life. Not necessarily my own life specifically (at times I'm not too keen on that one), but life in general. And it pleases me to believe that the universe has some appreciation for life, indeed lends itself to it through incredibly complex fine tuning of the physical parameters. That it has this inherent beauty to it, rather than being inclined to randomly decay into one in which life no longer exists and not so much as see the loss because it is devoid of that appreciation. Cause that would be kind of sad. The universe deserves to know the value of the life it houses, and to be able to enjoy it as much as the entities that live inside it, through them... ... meh, my thoughts are dissolving again. Hopefully I got across some of what I meant to. IWYW, - Aswad.
|
|
|
|