RE: Who is real? (Focus: Femdom)

RE: Who is real? (Focus: Femdom) (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

Whiplashsmile4 -> RE: Who is real? (Focus: Femdom) (5/25/2012 5:36:47 PM)
Jelly Belly is the only True Tribute acceptable, wait... TIM TAMS are also acceptable. Ummm.. Damn it, I keep thinking of other things now which are acceptable.

MalcolmNathaniel -> RE: Who is real? (Focus: Femdom) (5/25/2012 5:40:23 PM)
Just for fun let's take a look at the technical feasibility of this proposal. "Block Whole IP Addresses" I don't know how much you know about how TCP/IP works, but a partial IP address gets you nowhere (the little blue or black box connected to your computer.) You're packet will get denied by the first router it meets. But blocking is only useful for static IP addresses. As a private individual, if you want to have a static IP addy, you have to pay about $20 extra per month. All I need to get around this restriction is to turn my modem ( the other little black box) for an hour or two and voila! No longer banned. It is possible to block entire, um, "blocks" of IP addresses. That would leave very few people. Block Comcast, RoadRunner and Verizon and who is left? Blocking e-mail addresses? They are free. Switching takes seconds. "Digital Fingerprint." chokes on laughter All a digital fingerprint tells you is that it's the same person who set up the account. So, apart from forcing someone to use the same computer and account on that computer every time they want to post something on CM, you gain nothing. OTOH, it means a severe hassle for the users, admins and owners of the site. The only way to get what you want is to spend a metric-crapton of money on dubious solutions to a perceived problem. There are ways to secure the site against fraud, but that would require everyone to give personal financial information to CM, trust that CM is really a secure site and want to have that information associated with there screen name. This is unrealistic. Especially when you consider the fact that some people want precisely the same thing you are complaining about. I suggest that, instead of changing the technology behind the site and instituting a bunch of arbitrary rules, you change your search parameters. Actually, instituting an advanced search algorithm with Boolean mathematics, is quite feasible. Unfortunately very few people know enough Boolean logic to make it usable to the majority of users.

TNDommeK -> RE: Who is real? (Focus: Femdom) (5/25/2012 5:47:36 PM)
Um, I'd also like to add that Turtles and Starbursts (red and pink) are a wonderful form of tribute.

PeonForHer -> RE: Who is real? (Focus: Femdom) (5/25/2012 5:51:17 PM)
I think that the OPs suggestions could work, Malcolm, though not without some micro-simulacrum reverse software engineering being involved as well. It's tricky, because there'd also be some quasi-Python scripting required. Frankly, I don't know if CM's software engineers are up to that, nor even if CM would want it to go ahead, anyway. The big question is, of course, what would be the economic post-profit ergonomy? As always, this is the bottom line.

ChewMeUp -> RE: Who is real? (Focus: Femdom) (5/25/2012 6:00:33 PM)
I have no problem with blocking every IP address from the entire country of Ghana and nobody really should. If by some miracle 1in 1000 people are real there, let them call toll free and go thru a 30 day screening process. Or not. Better, give the site the new search functions it needs too. Just a couple little tweaks to the interest search page.

Whiplashsmile4 -> RE: Who is real? (Focus: Femdom) (5/25/2012 6:23:34 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ChewMeUp I have no problem with blocking every IP address from the entire country of Ghana and nobody really should. If by some miracle 1in 1000 people are real there, let them call toll free and go thru a 30 day screening process. Or not. Better, give the site the new search functions it needs too. Just a couple little tweaks to the interest search page. I only get a few Ghana emails a week, by the time I get around to reading these messages, their account has already been killed. I'm really not disturbed.

Whiplashsmile4 -> RE: Who is real? (Focus: Femdom) (5/25/2012 6:24:36 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TNDommeK Um, I'd also like to add that Turtles and Starbursts (red and pink) are a wonderful form of tribute. Ohh Oohhh yes...

servingyou91 -> RE: Who is real? (Focus: Femdom) (5/25/2012 6:39:51 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: PeonForHer I think that the OPs suggestions could work, Malcolm, though not without some micro-simulacrum reverse software engineering being involved as well. It's tricky, because there'd also be some quasi-Python scripting required. Frankly, I don't know if CM's software engineers are up to that, nor even if CM would want it to go ahead, anyway. The big question is, of course, what would be the economic post-profit ergonomy? As always, this is the bottom line. It'll work until the scammers figure it out and work around it. Isn't there like a report feature for this stuff? And I heard there are people on here who search for fake accounts and close them. I figure the site is doing their best for us the least we can do is be careful with our search. Not blame them for not adding features that only consider the short-term. Also the scammers are scamming people who think that dominant women are just a bunch of senseless brats because these submissive's are new, stupid and don't know what to expect from a dominant woman or know their actual role as a submissive. How are these people supposed to know what is expected of them? They may see initial tribute as a reasonable expectation for a dominant woman due to three things. First, submissive men are in abundance which gives them incentive to filter not-so serious candidates (obviously this is a wrong thought to have). Second, their role is submissive and that they should act as such (wrong thought to have). Third, they don't understand that 'real' dominant women are actually sensible and would not expect initial tributes and such without proving themselves first. It is simply a case of absence of knowledge/experience and enter into what they expect to be a completely new world and forget that people are still just people even in the kink world. How can you expect a filter feature to fix that?

ChewMeUp -> RE: Who is real? (Focus: Femdom) (5/25/2012 6:42:57 PM)
Holy dickwad on a stick crzyml. You wear the unmistakable mark of the cleft-assforon.

PeonForHer -> RE: Who is real? (Focus: Femdom) (5/25/2012 7:02:34 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: servingyou91 quote: ORIGINAL: PeonForHer I think that the OPs suggestions could work, Malcolm, though not without some micro-simulacrum reverse software engineering being involved as well. It's tricky, because there'd also be some quasi-Python scripting required. Frankly, I don't know if CM's software engineers are up to that, nor even if CM would want it to go ahead, anyway. The big question is, of course, what would be the economic post-profit ergonomy? As always, this is the bottom line. It'll work until the scammers figure it out and work around it. Isn't there like a report feature for this stuff? I've no idea, servingyou. I don't know anything about computers or the Internet and everything I wrote in that post was complete bollocks.

servingyou91 -> RE: Who is real? (Focus: Femdom) (5/25/2012 7:20:57 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: PeonForHer quote: ORIGINAL: servingyou91 quote: ORIGINAL: PeonForHer I think that the OPs suggestions could work, Malcolm, though not without some micro-simulacrum reverse software engineering being involved as well. It's tricky, because there'd also be some quasi-Python scripting required. Frankly, I don't know if CM's software engineers are up to that, nor even if CM would want it to go ahead, anyway. The big question is, of course, what would be the economic post-profit ergonomy? As always, this is the bottom line. It'll work until the scammers figure it out and work around it. Isn't there like a report feature for this stuff? I've no idea, servingyou. I don't know anything about computers or the Internet and everything I wrote in that post was complete bollocks. Fair enough,lol.

LadyConstanze -> RE: Who is real? (Focus: Femdom) (5/25/2012 7:24:49 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ChewMeUp I guess I look like a chick then, though not so in person. If not for the glare you could see my stubble and gratuitous eyebrows ;) You know after checking and rechecking with your profile picture, it is actually your avatar and it's your face, it's like one of those pics people hold up and ask what you see, I seriously saw a naked chick in semi profile, a bit blurry and lit by candle-light... Now that I know it's your face, yeah, I can see it, but I was wondering if maybe you uploaded the wrong avatar or what the hell was going on.

MadameM4U -> RE: Who is real? (Focus: Femdom) (5/25/2012 10:04:30 PM)
Trying to find a "Real" sub or slave is just as difficult for me as finding a "Real" Domme is for you. It is like looking for a needle in a sheaf of wheat and it is a large sheaf. It will take time, effort and lots of common sense in order to separate the wheat from the chaff.

LookieNoNookie -> RE: Who is real? (Focus: Femdom) (5/25/2012 10:20:29 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ChewMeUp Re: "Any Institutions or Individuals using this site or any of its associated sites for research or studies do not have my permission to use any of my profile or photos both current and future." Fakes and frauds are extremely prevalent in Femdom, to the point that I can hardly tell who is or is not the person they're representing themselves to be. To the point that I spend 99% of my time hiding profiles written by either [modedit for excessive quoting] Who's real? I can hardly tell anymore. Waaaaaay the fuck too long. The short answer is....I'm real.....everyone else is a lying sack of shit. (Glad I could help).

MistressDarkArt -> RE: Who is real? (Focus: Femdom) (5/25/2012 10:28:28 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TNDommeK Um, I'd also like to add that Turtles and Starbursts (red and pink) are a wonderful form of tribute. Also my personal favorites. Especially the strawberries (pink).

LadyHibiscus -> RE: Who is real? (Focus: Femdom) (5/25/2012 10:48:55 PM)
Lemon ones for me! Look how helpful we are, dividing up the package!

MalcolmNathaniel -> RE: Who is real? (Focus: Femdom) (5/25/2012 11:07:06 PM)
LadyConstanze is obviously a fake. Because she's giving you humiliation play. You must have paid her some sort of tribute. All I need to know now is how to reverse that so that I can get someone to give me submissive play. Alright, so it'll be just as emotionally unfulfilling as... ...aw who am I kidding? I'll play with anyone in heels and a skirt. Then again, I am shallow.

LadyConstanze -> RE: Who is real? (Focus: Femdom) (5/25/2012 11:15:54 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MalcolmNathaniel LadyConstanze is obviously a fake. Because she's giving you humiliation play. You must have paid her some sort of tribute. All I need to know now is how to reverse that so that I can get someone to give me submissive play. Alright, so it'll be just as emotionally unfulfilling as... ...aw who am I kidding? I'll play with anyone in heels and a skirt. Then again, I am shallow. Ha, nope, I think I just have bad eye sight, could have sworn it was a blurry pic of a naked chick, but you gave me an idea for the politics forum, I think I should go there and charge. Btw you must be fake, you didn't even mention proxies

MalcolmNathaniel -> RE: Who is real? (Focus: Femdom) (5/26/2012 12:13:36 AM)
I apologize, Oh blue-eyed one, I thought I had put the beast to the sword already. There are so many ways around his suggestions that listing them all would tax my limitations. People who don't understand the technology always say, "There ought to be a law." Well, there is a law: Don't be stupid. Yes, that's rather prosaic and hardly droll, but it IS that simple.

crazyml -> RE: Who is real? (Focus: Femdom) (5/26/2012 3:13:10 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ChewMeUp Holy dickwad on a stick crzyml. You wear the unmistakable mark of the cleft-assforon. Bless you.

Page: << < prev 2 3 [4] 5 6 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875