RE: Carter Unloads On Obama

RE: Carter Unloads On Obama (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Politesub53 -> RE: Carter Unloads On Obama (6/27/2012 10:44:45 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity quote: ORIGINAL: Moonhead If it's their hypocrisy, why have you only started bitching about these goings on since a Kenyan Democrat was elected? What is it that you believe I am pointing out? [:D] I dont believe you (nor most leftists posting here) have even the dimmest understanding of my very clear and concise explanation. Dont be silly bro, I have a very dim view of your posts.

Yachtie -> RE: Carter Unloads On Obama (6/27/2012 10:45:58 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery Question -- is Romney going to change this, and if so, to what? Good question, and I sincerely doubt it. I believe any change shall only be to escalate such use.

Sanity -> RE: Carter Unloads On Obama (6/27/2012 3:26:32 PM)
Nobodys pointed out the obvious yet Which is that Carters got to be racist

mnottertail -> RE: Carter Unloads On Obama (6/27/2012 3:28:24 PM)
We know you would bring it up, see the connection, present the facts, debate the actual issues and be a typical purveyor of imbicilic rushfelching drool.

Musicmystery -> RE: Carter Unloads On Obama (6/27/2012 3:32:11 PM)
He even hates the people who hate Obama. That boy's got it bad.

TheHeretic -> RE: Carter Unloads On Obama (6/27/2012 6:08:03 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery You can't remember what you want to discuss from post to post. Star Search doesn't have this much tap dancing. I'm pretty sure you can surmise how a economy in full nose-dive would dampen expectations of a progressive social agenda. You aren't old enough to understand stagflation practically, and this isn't it. No, Muse, it's just that I recall the central core of the conversation, and may refer back to earlier statements - in this case, things you didn't know in '08, when everyone was swept up in the Hope and Change theme. By your comment about they all do it, why then would you consider continuing to support him, if you aren't now embracing this year's Fear and Loathing approach? I'm the (legal) pothead, here. What's your excuse for the short term memory loss? [8\|] It would be one thing if he had tabled the agenda to focus on the economy, but he didn't. He delegated on health care, and that was it. The things I referenced were not dependent on a robust economy. True, I was but a youngster in the 70's, but I do recall the price of a candy bar going from 15 cents to a quarter, while my paper route wasn't earning me any more.

TheHeretic -> RE: Carter Unloads On Obama (6/27/2012 6:14:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Since all are constitutional, and lawful, there is nothing wrong with it, apparently. Well, gee, Ron. I guess I must have missed the Constitutional Amendment that shifted the power to declare war from the legislative to executive branch. Got a link to that one? Or a damn good argument to make, that declaring anyplace we think the leader of a sovereign nation is, to be a legitimate "command and control center," target in a sustained military campaign, doesn't amount to such a declaration? Note I said a good argument, Ron. You seem pathetically short on those lately. Baffling with bullshit stops working, once everybody recognizes the smell.

Owner59 -> RE: Carter Unloads On Obama (6/27/2012 7:06:28 PM)
Could you show us where in the Constitution is say we can torture people? Even a debate champ should be able to answer that.......

Sanity -> RE: Carter Unloads On Obama (6/27/2012 7:09:56 PM)
That I mock various leftists doesn't mean I hate them, you are projecting And though Carter is a naïve pacifist fool I grudgingly respect his consistency Look that word up some time, see if you can figure out what it means "Consistency" quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery He even hates the people who hate Obama. That boy's got it bad.

Owner59 -> RE: Carter Unloads On Obama (6/27/2012 7:11:49 PM)
[:D] Where did you get the impression that anyone care how you feel? That`s odd.

Musicmystery -> RE: Carter Unloads On Obama (6/27/2012 7:21:35 PM)
quote: why then would you consider continuing to support him Because he's running against Mitt Romney. Seriously, Rich--if the Republicans got some real candidates up there, instead of the dog and pony show they're been running, and some serious plans instead of the repeal and block game they've been playing, they would kick ass. That they don't is what makes Obama and others possible. Go back to being reasonable Republicans, I'll go back to supporting them.

Musicmystery -> RE: Carter Unloads On Obama (6/27/2012 7:23:13 PM)
quote: Look that word up some time, see if you can figure out what it means "Consistency" Clearly, you're expecting me to do your research, so that you can learn from it.

TheHeretic -> RE: Carter Unloads On Obama (6/27/2012 7:49:34 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery quote: why then would you consider continuing to support him Because he's running against Mitt Romney. Muse, I can't take that as anything less than an explicit admission that you have, in fact, embraced the fear and loathing campaign message. I got behind Romney only by default. I'm in California, so it won't matter if I decide in the end, to flush a protest vote to Gary Johnson. I don't think Romney is much of a conservative. I think that as President, he'd default to more government as an easy solution, far more often than it being the only solution. At Bain, his job was to make money. He did it. In 2002, his job was make the Olympics work. They worked. Massa-whatever-the-fuck didn't fall into the ocean while he was Governor. Barack Obama was named the Editor of the Harvard Law Review. He never published. He got a book deal for a work on race-relations. He turned in a heavily fictionalized autobiography. He was elected President of the United States on a promise to clean up the mess we were in at the end of the Bush II Adminstration by the power of Hope and Change, and he sure the fuck hasn't accomplished that. But Romney is baaa-aaaad. Got it.

Musicmystery -> RE: Carter Unloads On Obama (6/27/2012 8:00:37 PM)
Stop being an ass. You're whinging about Fear and Loathing. How catchy. Romney is for Much More Fear and Loathing. You also should know by now I'm not a-feared of the ebil corporations, and post so frequently. Hell, I outsource (Brazil and Canada). Stop drinking the Sanity-juice and pretending the world is in neat left/right packages. Btw, you seem to have missed "elected U.S. Senator of Illinois." A fucked up state, but who is California to talk. New York isn't shining so bright either. The Supreme Court alone is reason enough to keep Republicans out of the White House.

FatDomDaddy -> RE: Carter Unloads On Obama (6/27/2012 10:03:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 Well brains......The Iranians didnt negotiate with Carter, they negotiated with his Secretary of State, Warren Christopher, but tell me this, do you not think the dog would wag the tail ? You are correct that they didnt release the hostages until Reagan took office as a snub to Carter though. Do you think they were also negotiating with Reagan quietly while he was president elect (and possibly beforehand in anticipation of his victory in the general)? Not really, since the deal was done before Reagan became President. Only Carter could have signed off on it. Anyhow Fats already assured us Reagan didnt cut deals with barbarians (laughable claim in light of future events) I did subbie? Where?

DarkSteven -> RE: Carter Unloads On Obama (6/27/2012 10:25:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Breaking news - there is one consistent leftist on the planet Obamas wars by remote control are too much for Carter to stomach This, while most leftists are still proudly wearing their "Obama 2012" knee pads and guzzling from their ten gallon "Hope And Change" Kool-Aid mugs Are there any other consistent leftists out there? I like inconsistency. Agree with Obama (or whoever) when you think he's right, and disagree when you think he's wrong. What a concept!

TheHeretic -> RE: Carter Unloads On Obama (6/27/2012 11:13:09 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery Btw, you seem to have missed "elected U.S. Senator of Illinois." A fucked up state, but who is California to talk. New York isn't shining so bright either. I wasn't aware that he did anything with that seat except stand on it, to run for a higher office, Muse.

Politesub53 -> RE: Carter Unloads On Obama (6/28/2012 2:47:28 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 Not really, since the deal was done before Reagan became President. Only Carter could have signed off on it. Anyhow Fats already assured us Reagan didnt cut deals with barbarians (laughable claim in light of future events) I did subbie? Where? Where ? ...How about post 68.......how soon you forget, at least I man up to what I have posted. quote: POST 68: Except he did and he used it. During the election Ronald Reagan's started saying as President, the United States would not be paying "ransom for people who have been kidnapped by barbarians". And from the moment he became President Elect, Reagan began calling the American Embassy Hostages "Our Prisoners of War". And he meant it!

tazzygirl -> RE: Carter Unloads On Obama (6/28/2012 2:53:34 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DarkSteven quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Breaking news - there is one consistent leftist on the planet Obamas wars by remote control are too much for Carter to stomach This, while most leftists are still proudly wearing their "Obama 2012" knee pads and guzzling from their ten gallon "Hope And Change" Kool-Aid mugs Are there any other consistent leftists out there? I like inconsistency. Agree with Obama (or whoever) when you think he's right, and disagree when you think he's wrong. What a concept! [sm=agree.gif] [sm=applause.gif]

FatDomDaddy -> RE: Carter Unloads On Obama (6/28/2012 7:57:31 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 quote: ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 Not really, since the deal was done before Reagan became President. Only Carter could have signed off on it. Anyhow Fats already assured us Reagan didnt cut deals with barbarians (laughable claim in light of future events) I did subbie? Where? Where ? ...How about post 68.......how soon you forget, at least I man up to what I have posted. quote: POST 68: Except he did and he used it. During the election Ronald Reagan's started saying as President, the United States would not be paying "ransom for people who have been kidnapped by barbarians". And from the moment he became President Elect, Reagan began calling the American Embassy Hostages "Our Prisoners of War". And he meant it! Maybe English is a second language to you? Regardless of what your perception of future events, I didn't assure anyone of of anything other than Reagan's powerful rhetoric during the 1980 Presidential Campaign and as President Elect following his landslide victory. Maybe you should start another thread.

Page: << < prev 3 4 5 [6] 7 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

4.75