LafayetteLady
Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007 From: Northern New Jersey Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: littlewonder one that maybe is fed up with the slave's drama over the years? It's a possibility. I tend to see people who air their dirty laundry on here usually are some kind of drama llama. As for the kids and the ex, I think that when your kids come first, the ex comes with that if you want your kids to not grow up in a way where there is trauma and hurt and arguing. It's just not a good thing and I've found that the children end up harmed in some way emotionally. So I see having good relations with an ex being part of the package. Yes, but the ex doesn't come second. You have an amicable relationship with them, and both exes understand that the other has the right to have someone new in their life. While that should never supercede the kids, it should supercede the ex. If it doesn't then that new relationship is going to have problems. After being supposedly divorced for 10 years, you can have good relations with your ex for the sake of your children, but a 3 week vacation? No. The "new" SO having a problem with that has little to do with insecurity and everything to do with the exes not really having separated. Just like after 10 years, those kids should have met the new SO. I'm willing to bet the "ex" wife doesn't have a new man in her life, because he wouldn't be so agreeable to his new wife/partner taking a 3 week vacation not only without him, but with her ex husband, regardless of the excuse of it being "for the kids." Incidentally, such "family" vacations can be detrimental to the kids as opposed to "healthy." It can lead the kids to believe mommy and daddy will get back together, which certainly would make those kids "hate" daddy's new SO (although I seriously doubt they know the OP exists). As for the OP's *possible* behavior when he is on the phone with her while around the ex...it really isn't that difficult to step away from everyone (even the kids) for 10 minutes to call the OP in private. Let's face it, at the very youngest, these kids are 13, 12 and 11 if they have been divorced for 10 years, likely older than that, or of course, the OP has been with him for 10 years and part of that time he was married, in which case, on of the children could be an infant, and that shit certainly shouldn't fly either. ETA: to fix quotes
< Message edited by LafayetteLady -- 6/26/2012 9:36:24 PM >
|