ClassIsInSession
Posts: 305
Joined: 7/26/2010 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BenevolentM Should we embrace this New World Order? Funny that it was Bush the elder who spoke of a New World Order. It is entirely possible that we have been played. That we cannot trust either party. They both lie. quote:
Should we embrace this New World Order? Funny that it was Bush the elder who spoke of a New World Order. It is entirely possible that we have been played. That we cannot trust either party. They both lie. Anyone that doubts this in 2012, is either in denial or just stupid. I didn't vote in the last Presidential election because I couldn't in clear conscience elect Obama or McCain. But, I thought to myself, it might be good to have an African-american President, (at least 1/2) because it would possibly do some healing for our African-American brothers and sisters who have felt disenfranchised for so long. I always felt his promises of "Change" were ambiguous at best, but I tried to remain optimistic. Then when he got in and immediately started appointing Goldman Sachs people into his administration, I knew for sure he was pure talk. My list of reasons for detesting McCain could make a book. And again, with Romney I feel pretty much the same way. The derivatives market is probably the most obvious reason I could point to that would be a prime basis for rejecting the New World Order. When it melts down it will make the Housing crash seem like a speed bump. The entire world's GDP is 1/30th the size of the derivatives bubble. So if it crashes, basically if we all worked for 30 years globally, we might be able to pay it off, barring interest. At this point, I think the only way to turn the boat around really would be for all of the world governments to come together and agree to forgive all debts on a particular date, and anything a person owns at that point is their's. After the date, you reset the clock. Anything else is pretty much a patch on more patches. Alternately, we leave the global view and constrain markets back to national economies. The biggest problem we have now is that with all economies intertwined, when one crashes it affects all others. Iceland finally took a stand against the bankers and the government, and it has gotten very little press. Almost none in fact. But they fired the whole government, replaced it, and kicked the central bankers out. The central bankers then demanded payment from the people on the debts the government incurred, and they refused. Interpol got involved and a lot of people went to jail. They are recovering nicely as I understand it. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/analysis-and-features/iceland-the-broken-economy-that-got-out-of-jail-2349905.html
< Message edited by ClassIsInSession -- 7/14/2012 5:59:16 PM >
|