|
BamaD -> RE: George Zimmerman Update... (7/5/2012 10:12:02 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DeviantlyD
Comments like these speak to the lack of medical education of the poster.
Elaborate rather than ridicule, both are hard flat sufaces. and I know that the textures are different corelates to, rough equivelance, not identical.
How am I ridiculing you? I'm stating a fact that you don't have a medical background and that is easy to deduce from your statement.
A closed head injury, like the one your son sustained, sort of proves the point that Zimmerman couldn't have experienced the sort of skull bashing he claims. I don't know if you've seen it or not, but there is a video of a walk through Zimmerman did the next morning with police officers. In that video he states that his head was partly on the sidewalk and partly on the grass. If Martin had been slamming Zimmerman's head down the way Zimmerman describes, hitting that edge would have provided far more trauma than a couple of lacerations to the back of his head. I find it difficult to believe he wouldn't have had a fractured skull, never-mind a concussion, and yet there were no references to that in the medical report from what the media has indicated. Having his head smashed repeatedly against the sidewalk would have meant his brain would have been shaken inside the skull, impacting against the inner walls of the skull itself. That degree of injury isn't something a person can so easily get up and walk away from. There is zero doubt in my mind that Zimmerman is lying about Martin smashing his head against the sidewalk. His injuries just do not correspond with his description.
In answer to your question by simply proclaiming your supirior knowledge without any support. While appearently not your intent it is a tactic often used to dismiss something people don't want to hear but cannot refute.
As for your comments they make valid points. Has it occured to you that Zimmerman could have easily
precived the force driving his head to the pavement as much greater than it actually was. His head was struck by a blunt object. It makes more sense that his head wasn't bounced as hard as he thought than that it was struck by something else and he said it was pavement. Does anyone know what kind of pavement it was we have been saying cement but is that confirmed. If it was one of these blacktop concoctions it would change the equasion again.
|
|
|
|
