|
Louve00 -> RE: George Zimmerman Update... (7/4/2012 7:47:54 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD
quote:
ORIGINAL: Louve00
So, Trayvon's "attack", which could have been construed as self defense as a stranger was following him and he had no clue why, did not produce protruse bleeding to the back of Zimmerman's head, nor did it give him a concussion. Hardly a very feral or vicious attack, yet made Zimmerman fear for his life to the point of having to kill a teenage kid, that he later, in court, told the family he thought Trayvon was not as young as he was, however did tell the dispatcher on the phone just before following him he did think he was that young. Hmmm.
Not only that, he refused medical treatment at the time that night, and sought medical treatment only to get a Dr's notice to go back to work the next day. And while his Dr did recommend he get a second opinion from an ENT Dr, again, he refused. Again, interesting.
And Judge Lester is a very unpredictable judge who is not happy with George or Shelly Zimmerman for lying to his court.
I, for one, am very interested to see who is going to gloat and who's tail is going to be between their legs on this debate. [8D]
All true, in fact I have said several times that I think Martin would have had a very good self defense argument if he were on trial. However it seems that Zimmerman has an equally good self defense argument. You need to realise that the extent of Zimmermans actual injuries are not important, his fear that they would be is, keep in mine a man in NYC was killed by one punch bouncing his head off the pavement one time so regardless of the injury sustained at the time of the shooting fear of more serious even fatal injury was not unreasonable.
Yes, you have responded this way more than once to me. My problem with the credibility of Zimmerman's story is he's proven himself dishonest, for whatever the reason may be, we may not be able to believe his account or his belief of the situation and the story of the other side is unable to be heard to know whether Zimmerman had just cause. All Zimmerman has proven to me is his incredibility. If he was part of an organized neighborhood watchman (which it has been said he was a self appointed watchman), he shouldn't have been carrying a gun, he shouldn't have pursued a suspect, only reported them and perhaps waited and watched until police arrived.
Without the testimony of the dead defendant we can't hear the testimony of why or how Zimmerman defied his job description which no one is assuming he did, just that Martin must have somehow provoked Zimmerman to do that. So we need more evidence to know what happened to say for certain IMO.
|
|
|
|
