Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Obama The Imperial Ruler


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Obama The Imperial Ruler Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Obama The Imperial Ruler - 7/14/2012 9:23:53 AM   
Winterapple


Posts: 1343
Joined: 8/19/2011
Status: offline
I agree, to use a clinical term he seemed to have
completely lost his marbles.

_____________________________

A thousand dreams within me softly burn.
Rimbaud




(in reply to Iamsemisweet)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Obama The Imperial Ruler - 7/14/2012 9:24:17 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Very true

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Iamsemisweet)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Obama The Imperial Ruler - 7/14/2012 9:42:43 AM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
As I`ve said many times in the past.......there is no group who`s immune to their members doing crimes.....

From churches and temples to college foot-ball teams to elected officials.

People are flawed and it`s near impossible not to find examples of that.

However.....it is how the leadership of said organization handles the offender.....that really counts and matters.

At Penn state for example......it turns out that foot-ball-god Joe Paterno knew of the long time rapes and other sexual abuses suffered at the hand of his assistant coach.

Is all the blame on sandusky?

Most of it yes........

But what about sandusky`s enablers.....who knew and didn`t go to the police and let more and more and more young boys become his victims.....spreading the malignant cycle of sexual abuse to countless others?

There`s calls to tear down the statue of Paterno at Penn State.

No one is suggesting that cons are more degenerate than libs tho the quantity and quality of their scandles might lead one to think so.

It`s how the leadership of the offender handles it.......... that separates the men from the boys......the leaders from the sheep.

For example.......Denny Hastart....the Speaker Of The House knew of and enabled Mark Foley`s abuse of congressional pages......... for years.

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Mark_Foley_page_scandal



"Following the resignation, it became apparent that many GOP leaders in Congress had been warned about Foley's interactions with pages for years preceding the 2006 revelations.


Rep. Jim Kolbe (R-Ariz.) was warned about Foley in 2000

Following Foley's resignation, Rep. Jim Kolbe (R-Ariz.) acknowledged that a former congressional page approached him “as long as six years ago (2000)” to report feeling uncomfortable by messages sent from Foley. A spokeswoman for Kolbe added that the congressman could not remember whether he confronted Foley directly or simply delegated the matter to his staff. When asked directly about his actions, Kolbe stated, “We’ll have a statement on that. We’ll have a statement on that.” [10]

On October 10, Kolbe released a statement which declared, "Some time after leaving the Page program, an individual I had appointed as a Page contacted my office to say he had received e-mails from Rep. Foley that made him uncomfortable. I was not shown the content of the messages and was not told they were sexually explicit. It was my recommendation that this complaint be passed along to Rep. Foley's office and the Clerk who supervised the Page program. This was done promptly. I did not have a personal conversation with Mr. Foley about the matter. I assume e-mail contact ceased since the former Page never raised the issue again with my office. I believed then, and believe now, that this was the appropriate way to handle this incident given the information I had and the fact that the young man was no longer a Page and not subject to the jurisdiction of the program." [11]

Kolbe was immediately criticized for his apparent failure to notify the Republican leadership about the concerns surrounding Foley. David Smith, president of the Human Rights Campaign, noted that if Kolbe did not take steps to alert others, then he is “just as culpable as the Republican leadership in failing to protect pages.” [12] GOP Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.) also criticized Kolbe, stating “The pipeline should be straight to the leadership, even for this abhorrent type of situation.” [13]


The Clerk of the House, Rep. Rodney Alexander (R-La.), Rep. John Shimkus (R-Ill.) and the office of Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) were warned about Foley in fall 2005Rep. Rodney Alexander (R-La.) was the sponsor of the then-sixteen year old page whose emails from Foley sparked the controversy. [14] Shimkus, Alexander and Jeff Trandahl, the Clerk of the House appointed by Hastert in 1999, clearly had some degree of knowledge about Foley's emails with the page. Hastert, however, has admitted that his office knew of the matter but in the early days of the scandal denied that he was personally informed about it until late 2006, a position he later backed away from (see below for details).

Over August 30-31, 2005, the page forwarded the emails from Foley to a staffer in Alexander's office, adding that the "sick" emails "freaked me out." This was confirmed by copies of the emails released by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) and by statements by Alexander on September 29, 2006, the day of Foley's resignation. [15] (See emails at right.)

Alexander also stated on September 29th that he learned of the matter from a reporter after his staffer had, in late October or November of 2005. He said he then called the page's parents, who told him they wanted to keep the matter quiet. [16] According to a timeline of events released by Speaker Dennis Hastert's office, staffers for Alexander then contacted Rep. John Shimkus, then-House Clerk Tim Trandahal[17] and staffers in Hastert's office.


< Message edited by Owner59 -- 7/14/2012 9:47:46 AM >


_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to Iamsemisweet)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Obama The Imperial Ruler - 7/14/2012 9:58:13 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

Obama, the IMPERIAL president


Here's the thing.

Where was all this worry when George W. Bush was King?

It's not a discussion. Hell, there aren't discussions on this board anymore. Blind partisan swings.

Dumber every day.

(in reply to lovmuffin)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Obama The Imperial Ruler - 7/14/2012 10:17:14 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Well the Imperial Presidency was Tricky Dicky Nixon, they wrote a book about it.

This is maybe a Lincoln presidency.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Obama The Imperial Ruler - 7/14/2012 11:26:04 AM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
I have an imperial ruler, I cant be arsed with all that metrification. However, penis length, in centimetres, does indeed sound bigger than inches.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Obama The Imperial Ruler - 7/14/2012 11:31:07 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
but Polite, its not the length its the girth!!!!

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Obama The Imperial Ruler - 7/14/2012 11:42:52 AM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
Lucy, if you want something thick, phone a republican.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Obama The Imperial Ruler - 7/14/2012 11:55:52 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
OMG I just spat my pen into the monitor, I was just texting my "republican" pet

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Obama The Imperial Ruler - 7/14/2012 5:00:44 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
Just as well you spit and dont swallow huh.....

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Obama The Imperial Ruler - 7/15/2012 10:21:42 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

Obama, the IMPERIAL president


Here's the thing.

Where was all this worry when George W. Bush was King?

It's not a discussion. Hell, there aren't discussions on this board anymore. Blind partisan swings.

Dumber every day.

There were attacks against Bush for this sort of thing befeore he even took office. The Imperious Presidency began long before Bush Both Roosevelts pushed it.

The fact that Obama is not the first offender doesn't make it right,

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Obama The Imperial Ruler - 7/15/2012 11:26:13 AM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

Obama, the IMPERIAL president


Here's the thing.

Where was all this worry when George W. Bush was King?

It's not a discussion. Hell, there aren't discussions on this board anymore. Blind partisan swings.

Dumber every day.

There were attacks against Bush for this sort of thing befeore he even took office. The Imperious Presidency began long before Bush Both Roosevelts pushed it.

The fact that Obama is not the first offender doesn't make it right,

How about the fact that republicans wanted these changes.......?

What`s the difference here?

What a bunch of phony bull-shit whining......

No one`s buy`n the fake outrage......

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Obama The Imperial Ruler - 7/15/2012 11:50:50 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

There were attacks against Bush for this sort of thing befeore he even took office. The Imperious Presidency began long before Bush Both Roosevelts pushed it.

The fact that Obama is not the first offender doesn't make it right


Granted. Just hypocritical on the part of the screamers.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Obama The Imperial Ruler - 7/15/2012 2:37:07 PM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
Putting Caligula and Obama together is like saying doris day was a nazi hit queen

She wasn't? That's the fantasy of her dressed as Dyan Thorne out of the window, then...

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Obama The Imperial Ruler - 7/15/2012 2:53:40 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
So, for the thinking people, which probably will not include those who are happy to characterize medical procedures as, "rape," when it suits their agenda, and equally happy to recharacterize the personal act of a man who forces a teenager to have sex against her will, as anything but that, let's talk about one of the Democrat's brilliant ideas for a program to move welfare recipients into jobs (with the next generation to pay for it).

Like so many of the "bright ideas" the libbies come up, it looks very compassionate and helpful on the surface, and it will be sold as helping the very poorest of the poor. Which is a crock of shit, but appeals both to people who can't get their brains unstuck from the, "awww," response (with exceptions - see above) and those who think it is the responsibility of government to care for them from the cradle to the grave.

It's a jobs program, alright. The "right sorts" of businesses will apply to be granted free labor, provided by the government, which will assign welfare recipients to the positions. A third party agency will be brought in, to administer the program, and act as a liability shield. The rule change requires reports back to the Secretary, which is going to create more very nice jobs, with good salaries and excellent benefits, in the state/county/district offices.

The alleged beneficiaries of this scheme to provide them with work experience don't go out and find a job, they sign up to be assigned one. Their pay is unrelated to performance. Their boss isn't really their boss, the workplace rules only sort-of apply to them, and if they get fired, they step right back into the safety net, or just tell a sympathy inducing story to be assigned another "job." While they get their welfare benefits through this program, the time doesn't count against the lifetime limit to receive welfare, and they can extend the time even further by collecting unemployment when the program funding runs out. Now there is some useful work experience, huh?



(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Obama The Imperial Ruler - 7/15/2012 3:03:04 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

There were attacks against Bush for this sort of thing befeore he even took office. The Imperious Presidency began long before Bush Both Roosevelts pushed it.

The fact that Obama is not the first offender doesn't make it right


Granted. Just hypocritical on the part of the screamers.

Then I can scream all I want since I know it's a problem that both parties have contributed to for a long time. To late to fix then lets try to fix now.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Obama The Imperial Ruler - 7/15/2012 3:13:06 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

So, for the thinking people, which probably will not include those who are happy to characterize medical procedures as, "rape," when it suits their agenda, and equally happy to recharacterize the personal act of a man who forces a teenager to have sex against her will, as anything but that, let's talk about one of the Democrat's brilliant ideas for a program to move welfare recipients into jobs (with the next generation to pay for it).

Like so many of the "bright ideas" the libbies come up, it looks very compassionate and helpful on the surface, and it will be sold as helping the very poorest of the poor. Which is a crock of shit, but appeals both to people who can't get their brains unstuck from the, "awww," response (with exceptions - see above) and those who think it is the responsibility of government to care for them from the cradle to the grave.

It's a jobs program, alright. The "right sorts" of businesses will apply to be granted free labor, provided by the government, which will assign welfare recipients to the positions. A third party agency will be brought in, to administer the program, and act as a liability shield. The rule change requires reports back to the Secretary, which is going to create more very nice jobs, with good salaries and excellent benefits, in the state/county/district offices.

The alleged beneficiaries of this scheme to provide them with work experience don't go out and find a job, they sign up to be assigned one. Their pay is unrelated to performance. Their boss isn't really their boss, the workplace rules only sort-of apply to them, and if they get fired, they step right back into the safety net, or just tell a sympathy inducing story to be assigned another "job." While they get their welfare benefits through this program, the time doesn't count against the lifetime limit to receive welfare, and they can extend the time even further by collecting unemployment when the program funding runs out. Now there is some useful work experience, huh?









Attachment (1)

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Obama The Imperial Ruler - 7/15/2012 3:40:45 PM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

Nit pick? Sorry you got the wrong set of civics classes.

And go right ahead, Lucy, and elaborate for us on the rules of when rape, is just an unwanted sexual encounter. I'll be sure to bookmark the thread, for the next time a Republican gets frisky, and the libbies remember that they care about women again.


That book-marked thread can also be used when a group of college kids make a list of who they'd LIKE to rape and the PPLs lose their freakin' minds around here.



Peace and comfort,



Michael


_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Obama The Imperial Ruler - 7/15/2012 5:36:28 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

Obama, the IMPERIAL president, just unilaterally gutted Clinton's welfare reform law of 1996. This means killing the historic welfare work requirements. This suspension of workfare requirements is most likely illegal.

First, grant through decree deportation waivers to hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants, then rewrite "No Child Left Behind" and finally, bypass legislation that guts the only true reform in the welfare reform act of 1996 creating an even bigger population dependent on govt handouts.

It's a Sickening display of executive branch overreach.

Unemployment is above 8% for 41 months now. His lack of real leadership and now dictatorship is a partisan disgrace as John Boehner said.


Luvmuffin....you just opened up a can of whoopass.

Everyone's gonna kick your ass because 93.7893335761185% of everyone on CM is PC.

(We don't use facts here....conjecture is our thing).

(in reply to lovmuffin)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Obama The Imperial Ruler - 7/15/2012 6:04:32 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie


quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

Obama, the IMPERIAL president, just unilaterally gutted Clinton's welfare reform law of 1996. This means killing the historic welfare work requirements. This suspension of workfare requirements is most likely illegal.

First, grant through decree deportation waivers to hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants, then rewrite "No Child Left Behind" and finally, bypass legislation that guts the only true reform in the welfare reform act of 1996 creating an even bigger population dependent on govt handouts.

It's a Sickening display of executive branch overreach.

Unemployment is above 8% for 41 months now. His lack of real leadership and now dictatorship is a partisan disgrace as John Boehner said.


Luvmuffin....you just opened up a can of whoopass.

Everyone's gonna kick your ass because 93.7893335761185% of everyone on CM is PC.

(We don't use facts here....conjecture is our thing).


How about the fact that republicans wanted these changes.......?

What`s the difference here?

What a bunch of phony bull-shit whining

< Message edited by Owner59 -- 7/15/2012 6:05:01 PM >


_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to LookieNoNookie)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Obama The Imperial Ruler Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109