NuevaVida
Posts: 6707
Joined: 8/5/2008 Status: offline
|
Chatte and LaT, thank you. I was reading the dialogue about carrots, and I see both points. However, sure if someone goes to a grocery store and asks for carrots, they're going to be pointed to the place in the produce section where the narrow orange things that come out of the ground are. But...if you were talking to a group of chefs, in a forum about food, you can bet if someone mentions carrots, the question will be asked of what kind? Just like in a BDSM-M/s-D/s forum, if you say slave, it's a basic starting point but you'll be asked to clarify "what kind" so to speak. Slave, in BDSM, just like Carrot, in the gourmet world, is a starting point - an umbrella under which a myriad of varieties fall. To go to a gourmet forum and decide that ALL carrots MUST fit criteria XYZ or it's not really a carrot? You'd probably be labeled as naive in the gourmet world. But to say "I want to prepare XYZ for my guests and I need carrots", you'd probably see a lot of questions to clarify the nature of your dinner party, what is being served with it, and what type of flavor will best suit your needs. Just like here, regarding slavery. When I first started talking to the Mister and it was clear there was an interest between us, we had several conversations about what M/s looked like and how we viewed what a master is and what a slave is. And while we shared similarities in our views, there were differences, too. So we discussed the differences, to understand where each other was coming from. But I didn't care whether or not I was a slave or that I had a master. I didn't care what label would be placed on who I would become to him. I did care about whether or not we were compatible together, and if we'd bring out the best in each other, and if we would each add value and joy to each others lives. He didn't care about the labels either, only that we created a relationship that worked best for us, by our own standards. I refer to myself as "slave" here in these forums because it's probably the closest term that defines what I am to him, but I'm not married to the word; it's not all that important to me. I say I'm enslaved to him but I rarely say I'm his slave. If someone sees "slave" and decides there is only one meaning and no variation of the word, well that's on them - they will misunderstand me. That's what's cool about conversation - you talk, you clarify, you gain understanding, and hopefully you get some insight out of it. Jeff: I totally agree with finding the right balance. For me, the concept of changing for my partner is a difficult one, because of my own history. In fact, it is terrifying to me. It was a gut-wrenching, soul-searching, fucking difficult, incredibly liberating process to discover and create myself - so I'm ridiculously protective of that. Tweaking idiosyncrasies? You bet I can and will do that. But those big ticket items that give me that sinking feeling in my gut? All those caution signs come out and I look very carefully at what it means to me and the work I've done, to go forward there. And it's not without careful consideration and lots of conversation that I'd move forward there with him. In fact, one of those big ticket items temporarily broke us up at the beginning of this year, until we could figure out what was more important - his desire, my need to dig my heels in the sand, or how we'd be able to continue enjoying the love we have for each other while altering the path so it wouldn't destroy who we are and what we have. Yep - balance. Dang I'm getting wordy here, but this is a topic close to home. One last thought, and this is what I often see when terminology and definitions are bandied about. And it's what used to trip me up in the past, and what I see "newbies" come in with questions about. Things like "A slave wouldn't do/say/be______(insert scenario here)." That's where people start living according to labels and not according to their authentic selves. A slave wouldn't disagree with her master. A slave wouldn't get mad at her master. A slave wouldn't cry over this or that. A slave wouldn't sing in the shower. A slave wouldn't state what her needs are... A slave wouldn't....insert whatever seemingly legitimate or seemingly ridiculous verb at the end of the sentence. Next thing I knew, I was going through the checklist and eliminating/adding all "appropriate" expectations. I was now confined in a definition box, and farther and farther from the person I needed to be. So I climbed out of that box and instead said, "NuevaVida (well, I actually used my real name, haha) does/doesn't do....blah blah blah." And if you're a dude who's interested in NuevaVida, this is what you're going to get, overall. And if that doesn't suit you, please move along, because NuevaVida is not going to reshape herself to live by your definition. She'll make adjustments and compromises that enhance the relationship because it will bring us both joy, but she's not going to step away from herself again to make someone else happy." So when people come into the forums, as LadyPact referenced, thinking they have to BE a certain way or a certain thing, to be accepted, I think they're like I once was - unsure of self, finding their way, and thinking if they don't live by a certain definition, then they don't have a "place" so to speak. That's how I was. And I caught a lot of crap for it, and I also got a lot of amazing insight - depending on who was replying to me. I also got some very hurtful emails because of it. So now, what's more interesting to me is how people reply to those type of posts, rather than the posts themselves. OK I'll stop now lol.
_____________________________
Live Simply. Love Generously. Care Deeply. Speak Kindly.
|