mtcouple
Posts: 31
Joined: 7/10/2009 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen quote:
ORIGINAL: mtcouple quote:
ORIGINAL: SilverMark As the kid was leaving, and AFTER he had already shot 9 kids, killing two.....just a tad bit late....and all the assistant principal did was detain him....didn't stop anything, the damage was done, the kid was leaving the school....I guess it is possible he might have stopped the kid from shooting anyone on his drive home, assuming he would have done so? As I recall, the gun was in the assistant principal's car, which means that when the shooting started, he had to go out to his car, get his gun, load it, come back into the school, find the shooter, and then stop him. By that time the kid had already killed 9 kids. If he was carrying the gun, the outcome might have been different. oh yea, then there is this: http://www.aikenstandard.com/story/m1040-BC-SC-Shotgun-SCChurch-2ndLd-Writethru-03-26-0803--3890315 The guy had already been at the church causing enough of a problem that the pastor's son was keeping an eye on the parking lot. Concealed carry had nothing to do with this. If he had not been legally allowed to carry a gun when he felt like it, he probably would not have had his pistol in his car, and he most certainly would not have been able to carry it concealed when he sensed trouble. Please explain how this has nothing do to with concealed carry?
|