fullofgrace -> RE: Submission is a gift!!!??? (6/9/2006 8:42:40 AM)
|
i think this phrase is true, which is probably going to get me my ass kicked to hell and back ;) not in the way most people seem to be referring to it, but in that i am submissive. it's who i am. and to me, to give ownership of myself is a gift. some may see that as egotistical (i think someone has mentioned that); viewing it that way makes it seem to me as though people think one is supposed to devalue themselves or see their worth as low in order to get a dominant. in my opinion, though i DON'T view myself this way and am trying to get there, it's a GOOD thing for anyone to view their contribution to a relationship and their presence in someone's life as precious and special. if our self-worth is low, how can we be a healthy part of a relationship? high self-worth and self-confidence are usually attractive to people. it doesn't necessarily mean one is egotistical. i also view dominance in the same way - as a gift. it's a gift exchange, of sorts. yes, the gifts can be returned - but for me, they would be returned, or at least asked for, not just taken away. while we're doing the gift analogy...we do gift exchanges all the time...why does this have to not apply? now, someone mentioned submission being a responsibility (the dominant's). i used to think that was it. i'm beginning to learn the hard way that dominance is also a responsibility of the submissive's, in that dealing with personality, job, and life quirks and learning to be able to submit without taking certain things personally, has been a responsibility i've been learning the hard way over the past couple of months. though it's still a joy to me to submit, i have also had a lot to come to terms with in terms of learning how different people react in relationship situations (and dealing with people's ideas of relationship that are far different from my own at times). to me, being a submissive involves just as much responsibility for the dominant as being a dominant does for the submissive...it's just not in the same way, and not as discussed.
|
|
|
|