LadiesBladewing
Posts: 944
Joined: 8/31/2005 Status: offline
|
twicehappy, While I appreciate your passion, I have serious problems with your arguments. I felt it best to address each one individually, to be completely clear about what I am saying. quote:
ORIGINAL: twicehappy This is about all of the folks who write or speak feeling constrained and unable to FREELY so do for fear of being found offensive. Thereby often using words or phrases that are so far off base as to mean something else entirely. Which causes instead a great deal of misinformation. I'm sorry, but if a writer is afraid to speak his or her mind because he or she is afraid of being found "offensive", this is a personal problem. The writer needs to get a thicker skin, because chances are, no matter what tack someone takes, someone is going to find offense. If it bothers that person so much, maybe he or she should reconsider posting, rather than saying what he or she doesn't mean. quote:
If i write an answer to someone who asks the question" I like to be whipped only in the bedroom, outside of the bedroom i want an equal vanilla relationship. Does that mean i am a slave?” I want to be able to answer " No, you are not a slave you are a bottom" without ten people jumping down my throat and going on to give them an answer like this” if you feel you are a slave and that's what you want to call yourself that's ok, labels and words only have the meaning you give them". Which is total B.S. (no offense there Lady, only way i could think of to put that). In your book and in my book, this isn't what it means for -us- to hear the word 'slave'. If that's how you feel, you have every right to say so. I know, when we talk to people, we're very clear about what -we- mean by the word, and if they're not prepared for that, they're not going to be happy with us... but we don't make it universal, because somewhere out there, there may be an owner who wants an egalitarian relationship outside the bedroom, wants to spank his girl in the bedroom, and wants to call her a slave. So be it. At the same time, to stifle the people who want to say "If you feel you are a slave and that's what you want to call yourself, that's ok, labels and words only have the meaning you give them.", then that smacks of censorship, and if 10 people want to disagree with you and give a different opinion, they have as much right to state -their- opinion as you have to state yours. quote:
Now let us take that one step further, this person asking the question follows the advice given them and opens a profile stating they are a slave. To start with they do not understand why all these doms who are looking for a slave are emailing them with, to this person, all sorts of strange requests and demands. All they are looking for is somebody to spank them; outside of that they want a normal partner. And this person was given two different opinions, and made the decision (as an adult, which we -all- are on this forum) to behave in a certain way, based on the opinion she liked best. As an adult, she is responsible for that decision. If a person can't live with the way his or her opinions might be used, maybe he or she should reconsider -giving- an opinion. When I give an opinion, I usually make it known that others opinions may be different. If someone follows my opinion and it doesn't work for them, they have the right to change that opinion. No skin off my nose at all. quote:
Did we actually do them a good service with the P.C. answer? First, I don't see this as being a PC issue. They got two opinions, and had to decide for themselves which worked. A bad decision isn't typically a calamity, even if it is a sucky learning experience. The next time, maybe the'll have a question phrased more clearly, or a better idea of what they believe themselves before they take an opinion. If they learned, they were well served. At least, that's my opinion. quote:
Now you are speaking with this slave and getting a little upset, asking them” Why if you only wanted someone to spank you does your profile say slave?". Hmmm....maybe because when this person asked for an answer so many of us were so busy being P.C. we never gave a straight answer. It is good to tell them it is ok to be a bottom if that is what you enjoy, it is not so good to disseminate bad information in the interest of being P.C.. How do you know that the answers that were being given were PC and not genuine opinions of those individuals? Just because an opinion differs from one's own is not sufficient reason to state that it isn't accurate for the person speaking it. As a very blatant example, I will fight to the death for the right for an individual to call him or herself anything that fits with his or her idea of self -- or in any manner that his or her owner prefers him or her to be called, if that's the life he or she has chosen. At the same time, if someone says he or she has a "service mindset" or wants to live as a servant of slave mien among us, I know -exactly- what that means to us, and if that person doesn't meet the expectations we have, we send them on their way -- we don't diminish their own perception of self, but we DO tell them that they're not a good fit in our home. quote:
I want to go on the forum boards, argue, debate, exchange ideas, teach and learn without wading through the P.C. statements trying to discern what was actually being said. Take what works for you, throw the rest away. Censorship (which is what you're talking about, no matter how much you try to make this sound like it's in the "general interest) is not the answer. Da'Avatar ZWD www.klashaan.org
< Message edited by LadiesBladewing -- 6/11/2006 12:52:16 PM >
_____________________________
"Should have", "could have", "would have" and "can't" may be the most dangerous phrases in the English language. Bladewing Enclave
|