LadiesBladewing
Posts: 944
Joined: 8/31/2005 Status: offline
|
twicehappy, It sounds to me like what you're asking for is a place where there is one common definition of words like "slave", "master", "submissive", "top", poly, etc. The problem that I see with this is that these words really -are- defined by the bearer. What I am looking for in a servant is probably not what your owners are looking for in a servant, although there may be similarities. The best way to deal with this, in my opinion, is just to go through the weeding process. We keep our standards intact, and when we find someone who is interested, we measure them against our standards. It has nothing to do with PC or not. If they call themselves a slave, and it isn't what -we- see that label as fitting, we treat it like a fishing trip, and throw back the freaky or "too small" ones. The responsibility is ours, not some central labeling facility's, to determine our expectations (yes, we -do- have expectations), and to determine whether someone fits those expectations or not. It feels to me, from reading your posts, like you are actually -asking- for some PC, centralized, "nobody can argue with this definition", version of BDSM language. I, for one, would despise this. I hate the idea of -anyone- telling me what I can and can't call what I do, can and can't call who I am, and deciding -for- me what choices I'm allowed to make or not make. I'd rather take the responsibility for making the choices myself. If this is "being PC", bring it on, because my independence is more important to me than any organization or group, with the exception of my family-of-choice. Da'Avatar ZWD www.klashaan.org
< Message edited by LadiesBladewing -- 6/11/2006 6:30:14 AM >
_____________________________
"Should have", "could have", "would have" and "can't" may be the most dangerous phrases in the English language. Bladewing Enclave
|