RE: Does a sub have a right to demand exclusivity? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master



Message


Greta75 -> RE: Does a sub have a right to demand exclusivity? (8/15/2012 7:25:16 AM)

Yes.
Except, the Dom has the right not to agree, then both are just not compatible.




PlayWithMe911 -> RE: Does a sub have a right to demand exclusivity? (8/15/2012 8:19:32 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoundSlave4Life

I'm really interested to see what OP named her new profile. I'm rather curious.




Decided to go with "MaxCapacity2".




sexyred1 -> RE: Does a sub have a right to demand exclusivity? (8/15/2012 8:50:18 AM)

Brilliant! Love it.




GreedyTop -> RE: Does a sub have a right to demand exclusivity? (8/15/2012 9:04:17 AM)

Well done, Max! I wish you well in the future! And please do continue posting around here... you sound like a smart cookie :)




BoundSlave4Life -> RE: Does a sub have a right to demand exclusivity? (8/15/2012 10:40:21 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoundSlave4Life

The Poly isn't what would be an issue for me. It's the lying.


What she described is not poly!



I never said it was!!! Master and I are Poly. I'm stating that wanting to be Poly wouldn't have been an issue FOR ME. The lies would have.




KnightofMists -> RE: Does a sub have a right to demand exclusivity? (8/15/2012 11:33:35 AM)


quote:


I live alone and he said he lived with roommates that would not understand our lifestyle, so I was trained at my place.


according to who? could it just be another lie!? did you meet said roommates? and come to this conclusion on your own?

quote:


I definitely did not want to advertise my new lifestyle to the world, either. Not long after, my mom began dying of cancer. My sisters tended to her during the day and I tended to her during the evenings after work and on weekends. This ordeal lasted for about 4 1/2 months before she died. During this time we only saw each other a few times and I remember most of it being spent leaning/crying on his shoulder. Immediately after the funeral, I had to pack up to move to my new house.


so you were vulnerable! on many different levels.

quote:


After such a long lapse, it felt like we had to start over, but we did and it was a happy, happy reunion. We progressed in our training/lifestyle. I suggested spending time at his place. He skirted the topic (first red flag). After that, I said I felt like he was hiding me so it’s time we met each other’s family. He said it’s been a very long time since he’s brought anyone home (second red flag). That’s when I started searching the internet and found the wedding registry. I confronted him with it, but he said it was before we met and they were just “playing house”. There was no time stamp on the wedding registry so I could not verify this. Later, I again asked to meet his family and he again said no. I continued to search and eventually found the site with the photos. These time stamps were the website’s time stamps, not on the photo from the camera. Two long phone calls and the next day, I said I needed to get away from “us” to get perspective. After thinking for a very long time about all the inconsistencies in his story, I texted him and said it was over. He continues to claim they are old sites and says he can’t keep defending himself, but can he still be my friend.


so you found the truth... but maybe you should look before all those sad things happen with your Mom. He was in your life before that! What was he then? Why did you bring him into your life? What made you an easy victim? don't need to answer the questions for anyone but yourself. Predators do not go for the difficult prey... they seek easy prey!


quote:


Yes I was naïve and stupid for thinking people are generally good and don’t mean me harm. For those of you that are thinking “how can he be that convincing”, you should know he’s a police office and in my opinion they’re taught how to defuse dangerous situations by just talking people out of it. Besides, I doubt I was the first so he probably had all these excuses lined up.


yup.... have the T-shirt with being naive and stupid. I suppose most of us have been there at one time or another. His kind of people will just move on to the next easy prey!


quote:


It’s pointless to tell his fiancé, because he’ll just say I’m some obsessed ex trying to cause trouble. Besides, after being with him for 5+ years and she still hasn’t seen the signs, then she’s really deeper under than I was and will believe him.


it might be pointless... it might not. But it's up to your conscious to decide that!




wittynamehere -> RE: Does a sub have a right to demand exclusivity? (8/15/2012 11:43:09 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PlayWithMe911
he’s a police officer

*throws up all over the place rather noisily*
OMG, I'm so sorry, it was a gut reaction, I couldn't prevent it. I'll have my slave clean it up immediately.
*wiping off my mouth*
Whoa, that was nasty. That happens to me sometimes when I hear about somebody wanting to submit to the police.
*throws up again*




OsideGirl -> RE: Does a sub have a right to demand exclusivity? (8/15/2012 11:47:42 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PlayWithMe911
It’s pointless to tell his fiancé, because he’ll just say I’m some obsessed ex trying to cause trouble. Besides, after being with him for 5+ years and she still hasn’t seen the signs, then she’s really deeper under than I was and will believe him.


Actually, I'd probably tell her. I'm sure you must have emails or texts from him that would prove that he was involved with you while they were together.

I'd do it gently as possible and not take my anger out on her. It may save her from making the mistake of a lifetime. Plus, she may wants to get some STD tests. Lord knows how many women he's been with.




tj444 -> RE: Does a sub have a right to demand exclusivity? (8/15/2012 11:55:11 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: wittynamehere

quote:

ORIGINAL: PlayWithMe911
he’s a police officer

*throws up all over the place rather noisily*
OMG, I'm so sorry, it was a gut reaction, I couldn't prevent it. I'll have my slave clean it up immediately.
*wiping off my mouth*
Whoa, that was nasty. That happens to me sometimes when I hear about somebody wanting to submit to the police.
*throws up again*

While I didnt throw up when i read that.. [&:] my reaction was much the same.. cops are on my "Don't Date Ever" list.. I dont trust cops, period.. and if you ever have a serious problem with one, think another cop is gonna believe you over a fellow officer? [8|]




tj444 -> RE: Does a sub have a right to demand exclusivity? (8/15/2012 12:14:07 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Killerangel

quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl
This is true. If he was not living with his fiancee, it would actually be fairly to appear not involved to an outsider.



She said he has slept over and always answered her calls/texts. It would be hard to tell in her case since it seems that he is not living with the fiancee. My brother once had 2 steady gf's when he was young, maybe more. When the two found out about each other they both commented that they never suspected, that he always seemed to be with them- how would he have had the time to pull off another woman? Who knows how, but he did, and without the obvious tell tale signs of not being available at times.

I think with the internet and cheating being so dam easy now, women are a little more tuned into noticing clues than they were in the past.. at least i hope they are..

... and a GPS tracker hidden somewhere on his vehicle would help too.. [:D] While that might seem extreme, there are coodies (& some uncurable coodies) you can catch by someone that is dishonest with you & cheating (even if he uses condoms)..




areuhim -> RE: Does a sub have a right to claim exclusivity? (8/16/2012 11:58:27 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kana

quote:

GENERALLY SPEAKING: women communicate in one way while the males communicate it another.

hell, IME, this generality transcends d/s;m/s;BDSM.


Oh Hell yes!

Nail. Hammer. Head..

(It's JMHO and all, but I think, very very broadly speaking, using wild ass generalizations that would make my Logic teacher die of shame, but I think women think with their heart, men think with their head. Or women react first emotionally, whereas men approach things logically. Men go ABCDEFG, women go ABQ9~7?>&6D something Cyrillic, then something Greek ...And just to avoid the feminine blast I feel coming my way, lemme add that I think this thinking with their heart, it makes women better people, more compassionate, more considerate, more bonding, and, oh yeah, better emotional communicators too. So no, it's not meant as an insult or anything derogatory or women hating, just a general observation.)

^^^This cracked me up^^^

But it is so true!

BTW OP You were right to walk away from such a skilled liar. You deserve better in a relationship.




DesFIP -> RE: Does a sub have a right to claim exclusivity? (8/16/2012 8:13:29 PM)

Denial is not a river in Egypt.

If he had roommates, I'd expect to be introduced to them. That we would have a full relationship, go to dinner, the movies, meet each others friends and families. Barbecuing with the roommates on occasion.

I hope the op will never settle for crumbs again.

Oh, and go get a std scan. If positive, have your county health department send both him and her letters saying they've been exposed and must come in for testing.




MarcEsadrian -> RE: Does a sub have a right to demand exclusivity? (8/16/2012 10:18:44 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PlayWithMe911
As a slave/sub, do I have a right to demand exclusivity?


No, but you are well within reason to expect the person you're serving is shooting straight over such subjects.




kalikshama -> RE: Does a sub have a right to claim exclusivity? (8/17/2012 8:06:50 AM)

quote:

If he had roommates, I'd expect to be introduced to them. That we would have a full relationship, go to dinner, the movies, meet each others friends and families. Barbecuing with the roommates on occasion.


IIRC, I met M in person on a Thursday, cooked for him on Saturday, and he cooked for me on Sunday at which point I met some of his roommates. One roommate is a truly fabulous cook and I was devastated when he moved out of state.





chemeli -> RE: Does a sub have a right to demand exclusivity? (8/19/2012 11:18:55 AM)

I believe subs are people before anything else and as people with rights to choose what makes them happy, of course they have a right to demand exclusivity. I wouldnt be with someone polyamorous or who had a girlfriend/wife cause it wouldnt feel right for me.




AVegasMaster -> RE: Does a sub have a right to demand exclusivity? (8/19/2012 11:25:10 AM)

Demand? NO. Expect? Yes




Kana -> RE: Does a sub have a right to demand exclusivity? (8/19/2012 10:21:17 PM)

quote:

Expect? Yes


Why?




gungadin09 -> RE: Does a sub have a right to demand exclusivity? (8/20/2012 12:55:02 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PlayWithMe911
As a slave/sub, do I have a right to demand exclusivity?


You have the right to set your own limits and have your partner abide by them.

Pam




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875