Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: New Lows For The Obama Campaign


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: New Lows For The Obama Campaign Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: New Lows For The Obama Campaign - 8/16/2012 5:28:50 AM   
mons


Posts: 2400
Joined: 11/16/2005
Status: offline
hello to everyone

I wish everyone would sit back and just relax!

All of the things said that many of you call racist and I am a black woman
I find that they are nothing!

When the black community says nothing and as I wrote before Jessie Jackson and Al Sharpton
and I say it again "they do not speak for anyone but theirselves!

It has made me see things differently so many are here fighting about what someone had said, or they
ask if they "bacl community is acting upon what someone has said!

There is a term "walk a mile in my shoes" none of you can really say what is the opinion of others!

I hear someone of the trash about rap songs and the use of the "n" word and how we use it in the community!

No one in there right mind of a good family uses this word at all! No one is wondering what VP Joe binden said!

We knew he meant the chains to a bank, but someone had to make it a racial call, oh people we are not dumb!

In fact we are wise and just watch and learn! It is just like when a group of whites start a riot it is called something
different, it is not a riot but it is a but pillow fight, if it happen with non white it is a riot, apples to oranges!!!!!

I know it is more then a "pillow fight" I just could not think of the word!

We have learned so much I have learned much more I seen people here whom I did not think had racial issue
turn and say thng I could not believe!

TheHeretic: What a silly dumb thing to say: What pray tell me and I am black what is the lol negro lol dialect?

You have to be jesting? This is what I mean someone says things that are so far into the wind, the wind had passed gas, and the
smell is making me ill.

Ok back to the Negro dialect, do you know TheHerion that it is funny that you mention this, I do remember someone told me,
and she thought she was giving me a kind word , she said " your so different then the rest, you are so intelligent!

YOU DO NOT TALK LIKE THE OTHERS!

Now remember this I am the only black person she has ever been around, second if she had took the time and
saw the doctor, attorneys, scientist , who are the members of my church she would had known it was very dumb thing '
to say to me! It was an insult to think I was the only black person who spoke well!

TheHeretic how many blacks people do you really know? Have you ever had them over for dinner?
In the south everyone say things with a rich accent!

Be careful the south has some mean SOB and to tell them they are speaking the negroe dialect may get you some
trouble!

Please watch the "whites" this is their last name, it is a show they have a dialect and it is lol negroe , oh yes they are white!

Ok I see whom is the people who show their true colors!

If you open you mind and your heart to others you would see who is worth knowing!

You would enjoy so much more of life!

I must ask what are you so frighten of ? This is the basic of what your fear is, I remember seeing the
lynching of two black men, it is a very old picture but what frighten me it was the little girl smiling and
looking at the men bloodied and beaten bodies with a smiled on her face she had to be only 6 or 7 years old
that gave me nightmare ( I wonder if she turn to a killer after that?

best regards

mons( I fel sorry for you and some of you need to take a pill and relax hell if he wins again I fear some of you will
have a stork or a heart attack!!!!!!!)

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 101
RE: New Lows For The Obama Campaign - 8/16/2012 12:40:48 PM   
SternSkipper


Posts: 7546
Joined: 3/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:


No of course not

The mans got a D by his name

How could this possibly be a race issue


coming from the person that first fomented this as a race issue in the first place, I find your taking exception pretty obtuse.

_____________________________

Looking forward to The Dead Singing The National Anthem At The World Series.




Tinfoilers Swallow


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 102
RE: New Lows For The Obama Campaign - 8/16/2012 2:03:50 PM   
papassion


Posts: 487
Joined: 3/28/2012
Status: offline

The root cause of the economic downturn was the Democrat dream that everyone should own a house. Bill Clinton threatened legal action on banks that were "to cautious" on their lending policy. Thus unqualified people bought homes. Buyers defaulted, the mortgages that backed the investments wall street sold were worth shit, and it all came down. Google "Who caused the housing crisis" You will see a LOT of your hero Democrat names! Some Repubs too! You should also look up where
bush tried 16 times to get fannie and freddie audited. but Barney Frank assured people that hard hearted republicans just didn't want lower income people in houses and blocked any attempt to audit freddie and fannie. The rest is history and can be verified!

(in reply to LookieNoNookie)
Profile   Post #: 103
RE: New Lows For The Obama Campaign - 8/16/2012 2:14:56 PM   
SternSkipper


Posts: 7546
Joined: 3/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:

The root cause of the economic downturn was the Democrat dream that everyone should own a house. Bill Clinton threatened legal action on banks that were "to cautious" on their lending policy. Thus unqualified people bought homes.


Try the NeoCon dream of turning the loan market into a Casino. You can't blame Clinton for the wholesale thievery that went down behind the scenes on Wall Street. Where was Bush and HIS DOJ during the 8 years it was actually going sour?


_____________________________

Looking forward to The Dead Singing The National Anthem At The World Series.




Tinfoilers Swallow


(in reply to papassion)
Profile   Post #: 104
RE: New Lows For The Obama Campaign - 8/16/2012 2:21:53 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: papassion
The root cause of the economic downturn was the Democrat dream that everyone should own a house. Bill Clinton threatened legal action on banks that were "to cautious" on their lending policy. Thus unqualified people bought homes. Buyers defaulted, the mortgages that backed the investments wall street sold were worth shit, and it all came down. Google "Who caused the housing crisis" You will see a LOT of your hero Democrat names! Some Repubs too! You should also look up where
bush tried 16 times to get fannie and freddie audited.
but Barney Frank assured people that hard hearted republicans just didn't want lower income people in houses and blocked any attempt to audit freddie and fannie. The rest is history and can be verified!


As early as 2004, Bush was there asking for an audit.

Why he couldn't get that through in '04, I don't know.

Ron Paul was calling for the Fed's to divest itself of Fannie and Freddie in the early 00's.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to papassion)
Profile   Post #: 105
RE: New Lows For The Obama Campaign - 8/16/2012 2:27:56 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SternSkipper

quote:

The root cause of the economic downturn was the Democrat dream that everyone should own a house. Bill Clinton threatened legal action on banks that were "to cautious" on their lending policy. Thus unqualified people bought homes.


Try the NeoCon dream of turning the loan market into a Casino. You can't blame Clinton for the wholesale thievery that went down behind the scenes on Wall Street. Where was Bush and HIS DOJ during the 8 years it was actually going sour?



There were multiple warnings.

http://nicedeb.wordpress.com/2008/09/21/the-white-house-warned-congress-about-fannie-mae-freddie-mac-17-times-in-2008-alone/

This dates it back to 2001.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to SternSkipper)
Profile   Post #: 106
RE: New Lows For The Obama Campaign - 8/16/2012 2:35:54 PM   
SilverMark


Posts: 3457
Joined: 5/9/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: papassion


The root cause of the economic downturn was the Democrat dream that everyone should own a house. Bill Clinton threatened legal action on banks that were "to cautious" on their lending policy. Thus unqualified people bought homes. Buyers defaulted, the mortgages that backed the investments wall street sold were worth shit, and it all came down. Google "Who caused the housing crisis" You will see a LOT of your hero Democrat names! Some Repubs too! You should also look up where
bush tried 16 times to get fannie and freddie audited. but Barney Frank assured people that hard hearted republicans just didn't want lower income people in houses and blocked any attempt to audit freddie and fannie. The rest is history and can be verified!



I guess that Bill Clinton was the reason that they put the CEO of WAMU in Jail?....Not greed? Nooooo....All Bill's fault?

Countrywide?...How about them?....I know, it was that evil Bill Clinton and the Democrats....Right?

Taylor Bean and Whitaker's partners, Bill Clinton again?....What a BS claim to make!

Greed on behalf of those lending, those 100 Million Dollar bonuses, they were not incentive to CHEAT the system and pervert the law, now were they?

Nope, it was that GAY BARNEY FRANK!... he put a gun to their heads and said"Forget Judgment"....GIve everyone a mortgage, don't hold yourself or others accountable!...Just bank that MONEY!

Simplistic answers to complex questions.....

_____________________________

If you have sex with a siamese twin, is it considered a threesome?

The trouble with ignorance is that it picks up confidence as it goes along.
- Arnold H. Glasow

It may be your sole purpose in life to simply serve as a warning to others!

(in reply to papassion)
Profile   Post #: 107
everybody : New Lows For The Obama Campaign - 8/16/2012 2:38:36 PM   
papassion


Posts: 487
Joined: 3/28/2012
Status: offline

Yeah, there was thievery all over the place but that thievery was made possible by the Democrat dream of everyone should have a house! Democrats blame Bush because THEIR wet dream of everyone owns a home finally blew up on bush's watch! THEIR (DEMOCRAT) fuck up! The road to ruin is paved with good intentions.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 108
RE: New Lows For The Obama Campaign - 8/16/2012 2:44:18 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
and what is really pathetic about the whole affair that was underwritten by W and the republicans is that these few shakily financial black people who got loans from the W affordable housing act after glass-stegal repeal so that the unregulated banks could derive and repackage them as high grade toxic financials brought every betting parlour on wall street and other unregulated banking systems to its knees, world wide because there was no serious inflation on the adjustable rate mortages which in the initial widespread dump went foreclosure with the AVERAGE loan origination of 3 years, still inside the W administration.

  

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to SilverMark)
Profile   Post #: 109
RE: everybody : New Lows For The Obama Campaign - 8/16/2012 2:46:40 PM   
SilverMark


Posts: 3457
Joined: 5/9/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: papassion


Yeah, there was thievery all over the place but that thievery was made possible by the Democrat dream of everyone should have a house! Democrats blame Bush because THEIR wet dream of everyone owns a home finally blew up on bush's watch! THEIR (DEMOCRAT) fuck up! The road to ruin is paved with good intentions.


Have you ever read the law that was passed?....Really? It is called the Community Re-investment Act

You should look into it, then get back to me how it is that you wish to blame Clinton and Frank for a bill passed in 1977...

The law was PERVERTED by those institutions that wished to do something called a No Doc. or Low Doc. Loan....between the perversion of the law, and speculation by people without the financial ability to actually speculate, you have a housing crisis.

There is also a lot of personal responsibility, or lack thereof, that you simply whip away in a partisan shot at a party you disagree with.



_____________________________

If you have sex with a siamese twin, is it considered a threesome?

The trouble with ignorance is that it picks up confidence as it goes along.
- Arnold H. Glasow

It may be your sole purpose in life to simply serve as a warning to others!

(in reply to papassion)
Profile   Post #: 110
RE: everybody : New Lows For The Obama Campaign - 8/16/2012 2:49:22 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: papassion


Yeah, there was thievery all over the place but that thievery was made possible by the Democrat dream of everyone should have a house! Democrats blame Bush because THEIR wet dream of everyone owns a home finally blew up on bush's watch! THEIR (DEMOCRAT) fuck up! The road to ruin is paved with good intentions.



There is plenty of blame to go around for the U.S. housing bubble, but not much of it belongs to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The two giant housing-finance institutions made many mistakes over the decades, some of them real whoppers, but causing house prices to soar and then crater during the past decade weren’t among them.

The biggest culprits in the housing fiasco came from the private sector, and more specifically from a mortgage industry that was out of control. These included lenders who originated home loans, investment bankers who packaged them into securities, rating agencies that misjudged these securities, and global investors who bought them without much, if any, study.

In other words, America’s mortgage securitization machine was fundamentally broken. It created millions of mortgage loans that, even under reasonable economic assumptions, stood little chance of being repaid — and were not. As a result, hundreds of billions of dollars were lost as defaults and write-downs brought the financial system, and the wider economy, to the brink, requiring a massive government bailout.

Also to blame, of course, were regulators, who gave the private mortgage market little, if any, oversight. The market’s watchdogs were lulled to sleep by a misplaced view that self-interested private financial institutions would regulate themselves. This flawed thinking was most pervasive at the nation’s most important financial regulatory agency, the Federal Reserve.

Getting history right for this dark economic period is critical if we are to design a better mortgage finance system for the future. If Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are responsible for the debacle, then perhaps government’s role in a future mortgage finance system should be minimal. But if private lenders deserve most of the blame, the case grows for giving government an important role in backstopping and overseeing the system.

“If it grows like a weed, it probably is a weed.” This age-old banking adage aptly applies to the private mortgage lending business during the housing bubble. Between 2004 and 2007, private lenders originated three quarters of all subprime and alt-A mortgage loans. These were loans to financially fragile homeowners with credit scores under 660, well below the U.S. average, which is closer to 700. But only a fourth of such loans were originated by government agencies, including Fannie, Freddie and the Federal Housing Administration.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/realestate/fannie-and-freddie-dont-deserve-blame-for-bubble/2012/01/23/gIQAn3LZMQ_story.html

Lets include all to blame.. and makes sure the blame is placed where it belongs.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to papassion)
Profile   Post #: 111
RE: everybody : New Lows For The Obama Campaign - 8/16/2012 3:11:14 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:


But only a fourth of such loans were originated by government agencies, including Fannie, Freddie and the Federal Housing Administration.......
Lets include all to blame.. and makes sure the blame is placed where it belongs.


Thats just ridiculous. It is IRRELEVENT who originated the loans. Had freddie and fannie NOT lowered their standards to accept them - there is no crisis.

Fannie, Freddie and FHA are the buyers of 97% of US commercial mortgages.

The fact is that they consciously relaxed their loan standards knowing that this privatized gain and publicized loss. Ie., allowing the loan originators to make huge profits, while publicizing (ie making the us tax payer) the inevitable losses.

Fact: Banks were blackmailed into making sub-prime loans by democratic constituencies. These people demonstrated even in bank offices, at the homes of bank chairmen.

Fact: Community Reinvestment act mandated banks had to make a certain percentage of subprime loans. These laws originated in the democrat controlled house and the 93 revision signed by Clinton.

Fact: Democrats were the top benificaries of lobbying donations from the mortgage industry. In fact three of the top five were: Dodd, Frank, and one Barack Obama.

So please spare me the bromide there is enough guilt to go around. People should be going to jail on this - and the reason they are not is because BO and Holder are protecting democratic donors and constituents.


(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 112
RE: everybody : New Lows For The Obama Campaign - 8/16/2012 3:25:45 PM   
SternSkipper


Posts: 7546
Joined: 3/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:

Yeah, there was thievery all over the place but that thievery was made possible by the Democrat dream of everyone should have a house!


That's exaggerated all to hell but we get the rap "my crooks didn't do it. Besides, it was your guys that came up with ideas we could exploit"

Your posts remind me of PaHunky's btw. Just sayin...

< Message edited by SternSkipper -- 8/16/2012 3:33:54 PM >


_____________________________

Looking forward to The Dead Singing The National Anthem At The World Series.




Tinfoilers Swallow


(in reply to papassion)
Profile   Post #: 113
RE: everybody : New Lows For The Obama Campaign - 8/16/2012 3:28:13 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

Fannie, Freddie and FHA are the buyers of 97% of US commercial mortgages.


Just because they are commercial loans that doesnt make them the sub prime loans.

As to the rest of your rant... which is what it is... its purely your opinion. Of which you are entitled.

But before you accuse me of holding a position, you best be sure its one I do, in fact, hold.


quote:

So please spare me the bromide there is enough guilt to go around. People should be going to jail on this - and the reason they are not is because BO and Holder are protecting democratic donors and constituents.


Pst... there is more than enough blame to go around.


quote:

Thats just ridiculous. It is IRRELEVENT who originated the loans. Had freddie and fannie NOT lowered their standards to accept them - there is no crisis.


Of course its relevent... why wouldnt you care who lowered their standards initially to make them?

The dollar amount of subprime and alt-A loans made during this period by the private sector was jaw-dropping, reaching nearly $600 billion at the height of the lending frenzy in 2006. For context, this is about equal to the total amount Americans currently owe on bank credit cards. By contrast, government lenders made just over $100 billion in subprime and alt-A loans in 2006. Even in 2007, when the housing market was beginningits free fall, private lenders still handed out more than $300 billion via these very shaky mortgage loans

All this can be seen in the share of total residential mortgage debt insured or owned by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. At the start of 2002, before the housing boom got going, the two agencies’ market share accounted for almost 54 percent of all mortgage debt. By summer 2006, the bubble’s apex, their share had fallen to only 40 percent. It is difficult to see how the agencies could have been responsible for inflating the housing bubble at a time when they were losing a full 14 percentage points of market share. Indeed, the opposite was true, as their position in the housing market rapidly diminished.

It wasn’t that Fannie and Freddie made a prescient strategic decision to stay clear of the housing frenzy. They couldn’t have participated even if they had wanted to. The two agencies had committed various accounting irregularities earlier in the decade, and their regulator forced them to rein in their growth.

Moreover, Fannie and Freddie couldn’t compete with rapaciously expanding private lenders. Securitization was in full swing, enabling private lenders to offer low rates and increasingly aggressive terms to borrowers. In 2006, almost half the loans made by private lenders required no down payment and no documentation. Fannie and Freddie simply couldn’t play in that league, even though Congress had given them aggressive lending targets to help boost homeownership among lower-income and minority households.


http://www.economy.com/mark-zandi/documents/2012-01-24-Fannie-and-Freddie-dont-deserve-blame-for-bubble.pdf

Reading... it can be your friend.

Talking heads... not to much.


< Message edited by tazzygirl -- 8/16/2012 3:29:18 PM >


_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 114
RE: everybody : New Lows For The Obama Campaign - 8/16/2012 3:44:50 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

Wow, here comes the race card

quote:


MSNBC’s Touré: Romney Engaging In The ‘Niggerization’ Of Obama


On Thursday’s edition of MSNBC’s The Cycle the group discussed Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney‘s assertion that President Obama should “take [his] campaign of division and anger and hate back to Chicago.” Co-host Touré saw what he believes to be explicit racial connotations beneath what Romney was saying, calling it the “niggerization” of the campaign.

“That really bothered me,” he said. “You notice he said anger twice. He’s really trying to use racial coding and access some really deep stereotypes about the angry black man. This is part of the playbook against Obama, the ‘otherization,’ he’s not like us.”

“I know it’s a heavy thing, I don’t say it lightly, but this is ‘niggerization,’” Touré said to the apparent shock of his co-panelists. “You are not one of us, you are like the scary black man who we’ve been trained to fear.”

Naturally this led to a battle between Touré and conservative co-host S.E. Cupp. She took particular issue with the fact that Touré admitted that VP Joe Biden‘s “chains” comments were divisive, but is now calling Romney a “racist” for saying the Obama campaign is “angry.”

“Do you see how dishonest that is?” she asked.

...

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/msnbcs-toure-to-panel-romney-engaging-in-the-niggerization-of-obama/





Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 115
RE: New Lows For The Obama Campaign - 8/16/2012 3:55:34 PM   
SternSkipper


Posts: 7546
Joined: 3/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:

There were multiple warnings.


I'm well aware of Bush's tacet moves whenever the headlines caught up with him. That's why I included Bush's DOJ, which largely ignored.
But yeah there were TONS of reasons for Bush to lead and act unilaterally. He failed. Too many college chums in the way. And now, they want us to elect a guy with enough Harvard B School Cronies to fill an airport. An airport where there's a Jet Blue monopoly.


_____________________________

Looking forward to The Dead Singing The National Anthem At The World Series.




Tinfoilers Swallow


(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 116
RE: everybody : New Lows For The Obama Campaign - 8/16/2012 4:01:09 PM   
SternSkipper


Posts: 7546
Joined: 3/7/2004
Status: offline
quote:


Wow, here comes the race card

quote:


MSNBC’s Touré: Romney Engaging In The ‘****ization’ Of Obama


Wow ... that's a real shame.. you should tell your candidate to stop.
Or like write in Ron Paul.


_____________________________

Looking forward to The Dead Singing The National Anthem At The World Series.




Tinfoilers Swallow


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 117
RE: New Lows For The Obama Campaign - 8/16/2012 4:14:15 PM   
BKSir


Posts: 4037
Joined: 4/8/2008
From: Salt Lake City, UT
Status: offline
Yep, saying the word "chains" IS pretty low. I think we should jump all over him for that. I mean, that's downright horrible compared to how the right wing is handling this election. Stellar examples of fair play and kindness such as this: http://www.examiner.com/article/obama-death-threat-cat-impaled-burned-alive-next-to-obama-campaign-sign are being condemned by the far-right on this board... uh... oh yeah, I have been looking all afternoon and not seen anyone from our lunatic "right" here saying THIS was bad. But YOU CAN'T SAY 'CHAINS'!

Screw it, I'm moving to Mars.

_____________________________

We'll begin with a spin, traveling in a world of my creation. What we'll see will defy explanation.

I am the voices in your head.

BiggKatt Studios

(in reply to LookieNoNookie)
Profile   Post #: 118
RE: everybody : New Lows For The Obama Campaign - 8/16/2012 4:28:59 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

Fannie, Freddie and FHA are the buyers of 97% of US commercial mortgages.


Just because they are commercial loans that doesnt make them the sub prime loans.

As to the rest of your rant... which is what it is... its purely your opinion. Of which you are entitled.

But before you accuse me of holding a position, you best be sure its one I do, in fact, hold.


quote:

So please spare me the bromide there is enough guilt to go around. People should be going to jail on this - and the reason they are not is because BO and Holder are protecting democratic donors and constituents.


Pst... there is more than enough blame to go around.


quote:

Thats just ridiculous. It is IRRELEVENT who originated the loans. Had freddie and fannie NOT lowered their standards to accept them - there is no crisis.


Of course its relevent... why wouldnt you care who lowered their standards initially to make them?

The dollar amount of subprime and alt-A loans made during this period by the private sector was jaw-dropping, reaching nearly $600 billion at the height of the lending frenzy in 2006. For context, this is about equal to the total amount Americans currently owe on bank credit cards. By contrast, government lenders made just over $100 billion in subprime and alt-A loans in 2006. Even in 2007, when the housing market was beginningits free fall, private lenders still handed out more than $300 billion via these very shaky mortgage loans

All this can be seen in the share of total residential mortgage debt insured or owned by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. At the start of 2002, before the housing boom got going, the two agencies’ market share accounted for almost 54 percent of all mortgage debt. By summer 2006, the bubble’s apex, their share had fallen to only 40 percent. It is difficult to see how the agencies could have been responsible for inflating the housing bubble at a time when they were losing a full 14 percentage points of market share. Indeed, the opposite was true, as their position in the housing market rapidly diminished.

It wasn’t that Fannie and Freddie made a prescient strategic decision to stay clear of the housing frenzy. They couldn’t have participated even if they had wanted to. The two agencies had committed various accounting irregularities earlier in the decade, and their regulator forced them to rein in their growth.

Moreover, Fannie and Freddie couldn’t compete with rapaciously expanding private lenders. Securitization was in full swing, enabling private lenders to offer low rates and increasingly aggressive terms to borrowers. In 2006, almost half the loans made by private lenders required no down payment and no documentation. Fannie and Freddie simply couldn’t play in that league, even though Congress had given them aggressive lending targets to help boost homeownership among lower-income and minority households.


http://www.economy.com/mark-zandi/documents/2012-01-24-Fannie-and-Freddie-dont-deserve-blame-for-bubble.pdf

Reading... it can be your friend.

Talking heads... not to much.



Lies, damn lies and statistics. Much of commercial mortgages are not bought / sold, which is why I said mortgages purchased.

Put aside the quibble about the % of the market - the point still remains had Fannie and freddie NOT relaxed their standards their is no issue.

Second point: the banks relaxed their standards because they were REQUIRED to; and subjected to harassment to make them comply - first by private agreements, second by statute. So if you want to return to root causes - (which you ignored) you have to blame congress.

Thirdly - Freddie and Fannie obviously did relax their standards - and briefed congress. Which is why Fannie and freddie have such large components of the defaults. What are we up to 192 billion dollars in bailout money to fannie now - with billions more each quarter?

Oh - and I left out both Raines and the head of freddie.. what political party.. oh yeah.. Democrats.

Oh and who received preferential loans from Fanny and Freddie.. let see... Dodd. And was it Barack or was it Tony Rezco. I forget...

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 119
RE: everybody : New Lows For The Obama Campaign - 8/16/2012 4:46:37 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
dawg...is that you?


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: New Lows For The Obama Campaign Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109