Aswad
Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007 Status: offline
|
Up here, the emphasis was on the UK and the USSR, with the US and France secondarily, and little mention of anyone else until one starts poking enough holes in it for the teachers to say "fuck it... I dunno... I'm just repeating what I learned in school myself.", and so I eventually arrived at the conclusion that Germany defeated Germany, with a lot of help from the UK, US, USSR and France (with the latter mostly being useful as a front, tying up enormous resources by actually resisting with some success). Me, I'm more curious about what Germans are taught about it. Incidentally, the importance of the heavy water sabotage is not uncontroversial, as making a nuclear bomb and deploying it in a successful manner is a complicated and involved puzzle. No one thing secures success by itself, and several things can cause a failure. We did bring something else to the table, though: logistics. Put the fourth largest fleet of ships around at the time to work transporting oil and parts for the US and the UK, with some one-in-ten seamen lost in the course of the war. Material and fuel probably had a higher impact than the heavy water. History is an interesting field. The school subject is an amusing fiction. In any nation. IWYW, — Aswad.
_____________________________
"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind. From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way. We do." -- Rorschack, Watchmen.
|