DaddySatyr -> RE: Red Flag attitudes... (8/18/2012 11:50:46 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MercTech The topic on the culture of victim-hood discussion over on the General BDSM section got me thinking. There are some things that, to me, indicate a huge amount of trouble and have me walking carefully away from a submissive. I thought I'd toss out what gives me that kind of uneasy walk away reflex and ask what others see as an indication to vacate the vicinity. Overly compliant, refusal to state an opinion when asked. Face it, no matter how submissive, a person has preferences. Expecting a dominant to be able to read minds is a sure fire recipe for problems. I once had dinner with a person that kept saying "what ever you want" when asked about preferences for a restaurant. You would think that would be a simple thing. And taking someone with a violent allergy to peanuts to a Thai restaurant, they never mentioned an allergy, was a total disaster. Any date that ends in a visit to an Emergency Room constitutes a disaster. First, I'm reminded of my friend, a female dominant that actually once agreed to meet a guy, right outside his abode. I won't go into all the details (including the couch that she described as: "smelling of far too much self-love and far too few personal hygeine sessions) but, by the end of the night, she had to hit him with her mace spray. It was where she developed a mantra that paralells yours: "Any date that ends with mace spray wasn't a success" Now, when she's telling me about a date, as she first starts off, I always ask: "Was there mace, involved?" On a more serious note: I don't know where (other than possibly seriously abuse relationships) ladies -whether they identify as submissive or martian - got the idea that it's better to shut up, go to some restaurant you can't stand and stew about it, privately than to say: "I don't like Outback Steakhouse", when they have been asked what their preference would be. This one always leaves me scratching my head, as well. quote:
ORIGINAL: MercTech I have no limits. Well, sorry, I DO have limits. And, I need to know where yours are to know if we are compatible for any sort of physical interaction. I may have some dark fantasies that I never plan to act on. But, what I am willing to actually do with a person includes some limits I impose on myself. I'm not much into BDSM activity so this doesn't affect me as much as it may affect some, here but, my usual response is something along the lines of: "Oh, good. I have four friends coming over to watch the JETS game at my house, tomorrow. They'll be happy to hear that you're a three-hole, I'll-take-as-many-guys-as-I-can-get" kinda gal!" quote:
ORIGINAL: MercTech I have needs my significant other isn't filling and I'm secretly looking for someone to fulfill them. Nope, not going there. If everyone isn't on board and comfortable with the situation, it is staying platonic. I'm not trying to one up you, here but this is a situation I wouldn't even be in unless the lady had been dishonest with me, previously. Before any meeting, I ask for marital/dating status. If the answer is: "I have a husband/boyfriend/whatever but we have 'an understanding' so, it's okay." My response is: "Cool! The three of us should meet for coffee and discuss the situation ..." If the subject only comes up when we're face-to-face, she's lied and I'm walking (more often than not; immediately). My real pet peeve is after I've asked the young lady if she's read my profile for the third time and we agree to meet and then "I'm not really into BDSM. I'm more of a D/ser" or (From her): "What do you mean you're polyamorous?" comes up, it's obvious that for all the gripes I hear, ladies don't read profiles all that much more frequently than men do. Peace and comfort, Michael
|
|
|
|