MrRodgers
Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Fellow quote:
Yet Hawaii did authenticate the document.. just not for the purposes you desire them too. It is forged document, how could they authenticate? It is not a religious debate. I am out of ammo, Obamabots do not respect the facts. Facts ? Facts about a ridiculous and useless document as would any, if reproduced enough and old enough. The whole argument is irrelevant. The Obama conspiracy..... "First, the local newspapers would have had to have been in on the scheme, because they ran notices of his birth among all the other local births that week. Second, the Immigration and Naturalization Service would have had to have been covering something up, because INS officials were closely tracking Barack Obama Sr. when he was at the University of Hawaii on a student visa from Kenya. They thought that he was a bigamist — which he was, having married a woman in Kenya before coming to the States — and a womanizer, which he also was. INS documents in the weeks and months before and after the son’s birth clearly establish the father’s whereabouts and the birth of his son. Finally, the name of Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann, was unusual enough that doctors and nurses in Honolulu remembered it and her giving birth. One prominent doctor was asked by a young journalist if anything interesting had happened in the medical world that week, and he responded, “Well, Stanley had a baby!” Isn't there bigger fish to fry in this election than a 4 year old question...long since answered ?
|