puella
Posts: 2457
Joined: 12/2/2004 Status: offline
|
Hello Madeline Serenity, I think, and this is just my opinion, that it is a mixture of both. For myself, I am innately submissive. It is a part of what makes me the person that I am, as surely any other part of my personality. With that, I do not need another person to be what I am as a human being. It just 'is'. I am Jen: sensitive, intelligent to an unremarkable degree, submissive, genial, giving, stubborn, idealistic, etc etc. Those points of being are things which are innate to a person, to a large degree. However, saying that, I will also add that there are things about my being submissive which can be heightened and manipulated (I am not using that word in a negative way, I am just demonstrating the malleability of things) at the hands of another who can move me in profound ways. There are things I could not have learned about the nature of myself all on my own. It took the guidance and leadership of someone who was my owner to do that. He made me grow further into many of the aspects of my personality that make me me, and made me a better me, in my opinion. For that I will always be grateful. Sometimes, there are things we can give freely, and then there are things which must be taken. So to me, in response to your query, being submissive is nature, and dealing with and growing in your submission is nurture, so... it is both. (I wonder if I will have made sense to anyone by myself just now, hehe?)
< Message edited by puella -- 6/11/2006 10:18:37 AM >
|