RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s?

RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

tazzygirl -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (12/11/2012 1:49:00 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MissImmortalPain As my post said, Tazzy, I agree that a client should get what they pay for but what I was trying (and it seems failted) to point out was the attitude that if you throw money at something you get everything you want. You taking your car in for an oil change and expecting an oil change is one thing. You taking your car in for an oil change and expecting your mechainic to make your car fly is a whole different thing. Apparently I am not understainding you. quote: The attitude that someone should be able to demand things just because they are paying for something upsets me just a little. If its a service you provide, and the customer pays for that service, are you saying they shouldnt demand it? Or is the demand coming before the payment?

TNDommeK -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (12/11/2012 1:55:26 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: seekingreality I am not one for making grand pronouncements about the world, or what others should do, so I can only talk about myself: If a domme expected me to give her a penny, I wouldn't be interested. I've never paid for a domme. But if I was willing to do that, I wouldn't participate in financial domination. I would purchase a session. And I would demand a very very very high level of physical attractiveness, and I would order the services I wanted. Because my feeling is if I open my wallet, I am a client, and I get what i want. Everyone is entitled to their opinions and feelings but this is definitely not how things work with Me. I also agree with MIP's outlook on it.

TNDommeK -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (12/11/2012 1:58:42 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: OsideGirl quote: ORIGINAL: justacleaner No i do realize that, but I would term those relationships as being more fem led than D/s or bdsm. Well, gee...I guess I'll have to break it to Master that he's a female leading our relationship rather than having a TPE D/s relationship. I'm sure he'll absolutely take your side and decide that our 13 year relationship has been a sham. Also this was hilarious.

Nakhla -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (12/11/2012 2:26:46 PM)
Aw, crap crumpets. I am NOT appreciating that my post on this thread has lead to a bunch of lords and ladies looking for free lunches in my inbox. [:D]

TieMeInKnottss -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (12/11/2012 5:09:48 PM)
Being the financial type myself...are they all filing tax returns (the ones who are US citizens)...? If they are legit business people (& it isn't prostitutiion since there is no sex), then they need to be filing 1040s, paying FICA and unemployment.... Remember Al Capone was brought down for tax evasion.

OsideGirl -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (12/11/2012 5:21:42 PM)
So, was a famous "FinDomme" in the Los Angeles area: https://encyclopediadramatica.se/GoddessMine

tazzygirl -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (12/11/2012 6:25:59 PM)
That one still cracks me up!

OsideGirl -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (12/11/2012 6:36:22 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl That one still cracks me up! The truly funny part about it is that it came about because she acted like a twat and people got sick of it.

tazzygirl -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (12/11/2012 6:49:27 PM)
No doubt. Im sure many who engage in this "lucrative field" here are ALL paying their taxes. After all, isnt that how they take down most crooks? Cant get them on anything else... try tax evasion.

MissImmortalPain -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (12/11/2012 7:51:07 PM)
I admit I wasn't very clear, Tazzy, sorry about that. It is the attitude that bothers me not the expectation of actual service. "if I open my wallet, I am a client, and I get what i want" sounds a lot like guys that say I paid for dinner she should put out. A lot of people don't seem to understand that yes, you guessed it, there is often a lot of demanding before a deal is ever made. Or worse yet those that get upset because they think the deal will somehow change in mid service. I fin dom, as I said before am doing it for someone now, but there is no sexual activity in it. Most of the time the guys that ask me about this "service" get turned down because at some point or another they decide they are paying for something and they want something more than what they started out making a deal about.

OsideGirl -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (12/11/2012 8:15:07 PM)
And the posts made by GoddessMine are still view-able here. Interesting stuff.

DesFIP -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (12/11/2012 8:28:05 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl quote: The attitude that someone should be able to demand things just because they are paying for something upsets me just a little. I'm reading this as someone is not to expect services which the pro does not offer. She may offer spanking, but she doesn't offer sex or a relationship. Yet, too often, the clients believe they can get whatever they want, even if she doesn't want to offer it. You go into a restaurant you get to order anything on the menu but not things that aren't on the menu. The Chinese take out won't make you tacos even if you wave a hundred dollar bill.

AllisonWilder -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (12/12/2012 8:12:41 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl No doubt. Im sure many who engage in this "lucrative field" here are ALL paying their taxes. After all, isnt that how they take down most crooks? Cant get them on anything else... try tax evasion. I keep impeccable records and report every penny on my taxes. [;)]

mnottertail -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (12/12/2012 8:14:25 AM)
What do you list as your occupation? I list mine as capitalist.

QueenSimone -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (12/12/2012 8:36:40 AM)
What most people do not understand about financial domination is the domination part. Being in control and having the power to get whatever you want is the point in it. It is a very legitimate form of D/s. As a FinDomme it turns me on and I get off on getting what I want (big or small). Knowing that a sub Has satisfied there want is such a rush for a FinDomme. While it’s about the financial gain, it’s not all about the financial gain. It’s knowing you have the power to get whatever it is you desire at that time.

OsideGirl -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (12/12/2012 8:45:52 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: QueenSimone While it’s about the financial gain, it’s not all about the financial gain. It’s knowing you have the power to get whatever it is you desire at that time. For most that label themselves as FinDommes, it's entirely about the financial gain.

coldslayer -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (12/12/2012 9:10:08 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: OsideGirl So, was a famous "FinDomme" in the Los Angeles area: https://encyclopediadramatica.se/GoddessMine awww shiiiiiit! time to delete my profile lmfao. how dreadful. im removing my pics come dec 31. holy shat There are over $50000 of undeclared monies involved Thatta girl!!! lol.ok the more i read the more i laugh. time to go ghost soon. im so amused. the internets is fcking amazing. i just need to keep it cute

OsideGirl -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (12/12/2012 9:19:27 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: coldslayer quote: ORIGINAL: OsideGirl So, was a famous "FinDomme" in the Los Angeles area: https://encyclopediadramatica.se/GoddessMine awww shiiiiiit! time to delete my profile lmfao. how dreadful. im removing my pics come dec 31. holy shat There are over $50000 of undeclared monies involved Thatta girl!!! Well, let's see: She was a first year out of college teacher, teaching at a private school. She was fired and it will follow her when ever she tries to apply for a job for the rest of her life. The State of California does not play when it comes to collecting taxes. That $50,000 in one year that was undeclared means that they will hunt her until the ends of the earth. And 2007 was the start of the recession. It's pretty damned hard to get a teaching job without it being widely known that you're a for profit supplier of masturbation material. And she was brought down by people she pissed off. I'm so glad you think she's someone to be admired.

coldslayer -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (12/12/2012 9:22:03 AM)
who said i admired her? i just think she did well.

MissImmortalPain -> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? (12/12/2012 11:04:37 AM)
Mine say I'm a pirate.

Page: << < prev 10 11 [12] 13 14 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875