Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? Page: <<   < prev  66 67 [68] 69 70   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 7/26/2013 6:43:23 AM   
AAkasha


Posts: 4429
Joined: 11/27/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: garyFLR


It doesn't take a genius to differentiate between 'legitimate' financial domination where there is a genuine relationship between Domme & sub, & the people who advertise themselves as such, in the hope of making a few quid. Akasha's rejection theory makes a good deal of sense.
The guys who have a kink for rejection have their needs catered for, for nothing, while the 'finDommes' are screaming FAKE from the highest rooftop.

It's a case of the kink provider seriously misjudging their client base.





And if makes the angry subs feel any better, really, the 'fake findoms" are completely wasting their time and the subs getting off on rejection are getting exactly what they want for free - every single time.

This is 100% a legitimate fetish. These men love, love, love unobtainable women, especially younger princess types who receive money and gifts from men who are richer and better looking (and have bigger cocks) then them. Just like cuckolding. And I can guarantee you that instead of ignoring the subs who email them and engage them, the money findoms respond EVERY SINGLE TIME and the sub strings them along, masturbating, until the sweet, sweet insulting rejection letter finally comes, and he HOPES it includes a big fat juicy insult about how he can't afford her. BINGO! And all for FREE! Then he moves on to the next findom.

Meanwhile, Collarme racks in the pageviews. Everyone is happy except the findom, and the subs that come here complaining about the findoms.

Akasha


_____________________________

Akasha's Web - All original Femdom content since 1995
Don't email me here, email me at [email protected]

(in reply to garyFLR)
Profile   Post #: 1341
RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 7/29/2013 8:22:19 AM   
Rochsub2009


Posts: 2536
Status: offline
Bump.

There are several threads on the front page that were already answered here. So I'm bumping it back up to the 1st page. But in truth, I doubt that we can stop people from creating 10 new financial domination threads each week. But I still decided to try.

< Message edited by Rochsub2009 -- 7/29/2013 8:23:12 AM >

(in reply to AAkasha)
Profile   Post #: 1342
RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 7/29/2013 9:51:13 AM   
MariaB


Posts: 2969
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha


And if makes the angry subs feel any better, really, the 'fake findoms" are completely wasting their time and the subs getting off on rejection are getting exactly what they want for free - every single time.

This is 100% a legitimate fetish. These men love, love, love unobtainable women, especially younger princess types who receive money and gifts from men who are richer and better looking (and have bigger cocks) then them. Just like cuckolding. And I can guarantee you that instead of ignoring the subs who email them and engage them, the money findoms respond EVERY SINGLE TIME and the sub strings them along, masturbating, until the sweet, sweet insulting rejection letter finally comes, and he HOPES it includes a big fat juicy insult about how he can't afford her. BINGO! And all for FREE! Then he moves on to the next findom.

Meanwhile, Collarme racks in the pageviews. Everyone is happy except the findom, and the subs that come here complaining about the findoms.

Akasha



Bang on!!!


_____________________________

My store is http://e-stimstore.com

(in reply to AAkasha)
Profile   Post #: 1343
RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 7/29/2013 11:12:54 AM   
TNDommeK


Posts: 7153
Joined: 3/13/2010
Status: offline
This. ^^

Every time I read a journal entry of some fin duck posting the user name and calling him losers and such bc he didn't pay her, I just shake my head. DON'T GIVE AWAY WHAT WE CAN SELL!!! Lol

_____________________________

Goddess of Duck Lips and Luxurious Hair
The working Fin Domme
Professional con artist, swindler, trixster, extortionist

Our snark-nado needs more cowbell


(in reply to MariaB)
Profile   Post #: 1344
RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 7/29/2013 12:45:13 PM   
VideoAdminChi


Posts: 3086
Joined: 8/6/2012
Status: offline
quote:

There are several threads on the front page that were already answered here. So I'm bumping it back up to the 1st page. But in truth, I doubt that we can stop people from creating 10 new financial domination threads each week. But I still decided to try.


If you Report threads that duplicate existing current topics, we mods will be happy to lock or zap them.


(in reply to Rochsub2009)
Profile   Post #: 1345
RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 7/29/2013 1:31:26 PM   
Spiritedsub2


Posts: 3316
Joined: 7/18/2012
Status: offline
I think the entire topic of financial domination is so endlessly fascinating that it deserves its very own permanent sticky thread, with all questions and comments on the topic posted in that sticky only! That way we never have to risk missing a single financial domination post and the rest of the forum contents is easier to see.

_____________________________

Don’t grieve. Anything you lose comes round in another form.
~ Rumi

Laughing Dolphin

(in reply to VideoAdminChi)
Profile   Post #: 1346
RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 7/29/2013 2:59:52 PM   
TNDommeK


Posts: 7153
Joined: 3/13/2010
Status: offline
I think we tried to get this one to be a sticky. This is the best thread of it I've ever seen.
Aside from the ignorance a few pages back, that I think we're wiped clean. This thread is very educational.

_____________________________

Goddess of Duck Lips and Luxurious Hair
The working Fin Domme
Professional con artist, swindler, trixster, extortionist

Our snark-nado needs more cowbell


(in reply to Spiritedsub2)
Profile   Post #: 1347
RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 7/29/2013 5:50:01 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
It was a sticky for less than a day. Alpha put up an explanation that it wouldn't be fair to make this a sticky over and above questions on other kinks. I do see her side of things when coming from that angle.

So, the answer is now simple. As long as this thread stays current, from what Chi is saying, they will zap what would be considered duplicate threads on the same topic. We could literally rid ourselves of the continual pile of rants about fin kink if we just manage to keep this one on the board.


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to TNDommeK)
Profile   Post #: 1348
RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 7/29/2013 5:55:28 PM   
MissToYouRedux


Posts: 867
Joined: 1/23/2010
Status: offline
The sticky should say "FinDomme Questions/Comments go here" and provide a link to this thread. It would make everyone's lives easier.

_____________________________

- Miss Marie


(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 1349
RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 7/29/2013 6:43:18 PM   
SeekingTrinity


Posts: 1834
Joined: 5/29/2012
From: The 'burbs of Portland, OR
Status: offline
Might I suggest setting up appointments for the "FinDomme is a fake/prostitute/won't give me time of day/<fill in the complaint>" and then charge $100 per character for their rant? If we all got a split, the whining ad nauseum we listen to would be worth it

(in reply to MissToYouRedux)
Profile   Post #: 1350
RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 7/29/2013 7:46:46 PM   
TNDommeK


Posts: 7153
Joined: 3/13/2010
Status: offline
I'll keep this thread going everyday if I have too.

However, if someone had a legit question about fin Domme, would they know to ask it here? I don't mind serious questions, but idiotic statements should be banned.

I'm with ST, we could get rich real quick.

_____________________________

Goddess of Duck Lips and Luxurious Hair
The working Fin Domme
Professional con artist, swindler, trixster, extortionist

Our snark-nado needs more cowbell


(in reply to SeekingTrinity)
Profile   Post #: 1351
RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 7/30/2013 12:28:52 AM   
MariaB


Posts: 2969
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline
I think one of the things, which would be very simple to do, is put a tick box (if you are a financial or pro Domme) in the profile page. So many of the complaints come from men who say they start chatting to someone and suddenly discover she's a fin Domme. A simple tick would solve that and it would also be helpful to the fin/pro Dommes because people who clicked on their profile are more likely looking for a fin/pro Domme.

< Message edited by MariaB -- 7/30/2013 12:29:41 AM >


_____________________________

My store is http://e-stimstore.com

(in reply to TNDommeK)
Profile   Post #: 1352
RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 7/30/2013 12:31:52 AM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MariaB
I think one of the things, which would be very simple to do, is put a tick box (if you are a financial or pro Domme) in the profile page. So many of the complaints come from men who say they start chatting to someone and suddenly discover she's a fin Domme. A simple tick would solve that and it would also be helpful to the fin/pro Dommes because people who clicked on their profile are more likely looking for a fin/pro Domme.

If they only discover that after they start chatting, what makes you think the woman would check the box?



_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to MariaB)
Profile   Post #: 1353
RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 7/30/2013 1:07:57 AM   
TNDommeK


Posts: 7153
Joined: 3/13/2010
Status: offline
My profile says that on the first line.

_____________________________

Goddess of Duck Lips and Luxurious Hair
The working Fin Domme
Professional con artist, swindler, trixster, extortionist

Our snark-nado needs more cowbell


(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 1354
RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 7/30/2013 1:10:46 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
pft.. 4th.. I just checked

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to TNDommeK)
Profile   Post #: 1355
RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 7/30/2013 2:09:30 AM   
TNDommeK


Posts: 7153
Joined: 3/13/2010
Status: offline
Lol...well it's close to the top,lol.

_____________________________

Goddess of Duck Lips and Luxurious Hair
The working Fin Domme
Professional con artist, swindler, trixster, extortionist

Our snark-nado needs more cowbell


(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 1356
RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 7/30/2013 2:15:22 AM   
crazyml


Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha


quote:

ORIGINAL: garyFLR


It doesn't take a genius to differentiate between 'legitimate' financial domination where there is a genuine relationship between Domme & sub, & the people who advertise themselves as such, in the hope of making a few quid. Akasha's rejection theory makes a good deal of sense.
The guys who have a kink for rejection have their needs catered for, for nothing, while the 'finDommes' are screaming FAKE from the highest rooftop.

It's a case of the kink provider seriously misjudging their client base.





And if makes the angry subs feel any better, really, the 'fake findoms" are completely wasting their time and the subs getting off on rejection are getting exactly what they want for free - every single time.

This is 100% a legitimate fetish. These men love, love, love unobtainable women, especially younger princess types who receive money and gifts from men who are richer and better looking (and have bigger cocks) then them. Just like cuckolding. And I can guarantee you that instead of ignoring the subs who email them and engage them, the money findoms respond EVERY SINGLE TIME and the sub strings them along, masturbating, until the sweet, sweet insulting rejection letter finally comes, and he HOPES it includes a big fat juicy insult about how he can't afford her. BINGO! And all for FREE! Then he moves on to the next findom.

Meanwhile, Collarme racks in the pageviews. Everyone is happy except the findom, and the subs that come here complaining about the findoms.

Akasha



This


_____________________________

Remember.... There's always somewhere on the planet where it's jackass o'clock.

(in reply to AAkasha)
Profile   Post #: 1357
RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 7/30/2013 5:57:10 AM   
MariaB


Posts: 2969
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: MariaB
I think one of the things, which would be very simple to do, is put a tick box (if you are a financial or pro Domme) in the profile page. So many of the complaints come from men who say they start chatting to someone and suddenly discover she's a fin Domme. A simple tick would solve that and it would also be helpful to the fin/pro Dommes because people who clicked on their profile are more likely looking for a fin/pro Domme.

If they only discover that after they start chatting, what makes you think the woman would check the box?




On Informed Consent, which has now closed down, they had this system in place. They put a warning up to financial and pro Dommes, asking that they tick the box if they were using that site to collect money or gifts. It quite clearly stated, if they didn't tick the box but continued to tout people regardless, when found out they would be banned.

In all the years they did that, I saw people were happy to tick the box and I never heard any complaints about people being deceitful. I generally don't think people want to be dishonest.


_____________________________

My store is http://e-stimstore.com

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 1358
RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 7/30/2013 6:00:54 AM   
MissKittyDeVine


Posts: 1054
Joined: 9/24/2011
Status: offline
And if we ticked such a box, we would still get whiny rants from certain quarters about all findoms/prodommes being whores and scammers.

_____________________________

Sanity is overrated. Live la vida loca

(in reply to MariaB)
Profile   Post #: 1359
RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? - 7/30/2013 6:07:59 AM   
imtempting


Posts: 1280
Joined: 2/11/2005
Status: offline
No its not.

(in reply to MissKittyDeVine)
Profile   Post #: 1360
Page:   <<   < prev  66 67 [68] 69 70   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Is financial domination a legitimate form of D/s? Page: <<   < prev  66 67 [68] 69 70   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.187