JeffBC
Posts: 5799
Joined: 2/12/2012 From: Canada Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Winterapple I think what Jeff described that he is doing online could be called financial domination. But this sort of financial domination couldn't be construed as sex work as Jeff is receiving no financial gain from it. Uh, more significantly, you couldn't really call it sex work because there's no sex, sexuality, kinkiness, or anything of that ilk involved. If we were going to call it sex work then we might as well call my financial advisor a sex worker too :) Which doesn't one bit change how funny I find it that now I'm a FinDom :) YAY Can i be one of the K crowd? quote:
There are relationships where Masters and Mistress financially dominate slaves they have a personal relationship with which I'm defining as a offline relationship. They control the slaves money and dictate how it's spent etc. They could even benefit materially from the arrangement but I wouldn't call that sex work either. Yeah, I tend to call it "marriage" quote:
I don't doubt some online fin dommes get pleasure in what they do but unless the money is going to charity I think it qualifies as work, sex work. Not prostitution. And just so nobody misconstrues my earlier comments, at a legal level I totally and completely agree and, in fact, feel compelled to point out K's example (and damnit, where'd that other findomme I liked so well go?) I don't have an entirely clear picture of what she does but in reading her descriptions it didn't trip any flags in me at all and I'm pretty vanilla in my sensibilities about most things. I would not call my understanding of K's relationships "sex work". I filed it in my head more as an actual relationship with a money manager.
_____________________________
I'm a lover of "what is", not because I'm a spiritual person, but because it hurts when I argue with reality. -- Bryon Katie "You're humbly arrogant" -- sunshinemiss officially a member of the K Crowd
|