RE: Did the RNC take advantage of a senile old man?

RE: Did the RNC take advantage of a senile old man? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Musicmystery -> RE: Did the RNC take advantage of a senile old man? (8/31/2012 9:00:39 PM)
Those on the "right," and there are many here on collarme, don't see it that way. Hill, you are exactly right.

marie2 -> RE: Did the RNC take advantage of a senile old man? (8/31/2012 9:18:05 PM)
oy.

Hillwilliam -> RE: Did the RNC take advantage of a senile old man? (8/31/2012 9:25:50 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: marie2 oy. You made a claim. Please back it up. Who here claimed that he didnt know he was talking to a chair?

Musicmystery -> RE: Did the RNC take advantage of a senile old man? (8/31/2012 9:36:27 PM)
[image]http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/s480x480/539429_411449465571632_1085512935_n.jpg[/image]

Musicmystery -> RE: Did the RNC take advantage of a senile old man? (8/31/2012 9:39:52 PM)
[image]http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/s480x480/574464_475604982457821_1139726922_n.jpg[/image]

marie2 -> RE: Did the RNC take advantage of a senile old man? (8/31/2012 9:46:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam quote: ORIGINAL: marie2 oy. You made a claim. Please back it up. Who here claimed that he didnt know he was talking to a chair? I didn't say that anyone "here" "claimed" anything. I used the term "general implication". Just look around you....The media, the social networking sites, the jokes, the various message boards etc. It's been all over the place today....."Any which way but Lucid" "Is Clint senile?" "Was Clint exploited?" etc etc. Edited for a typo.

TheHeretic -> RE: Did the RNC take advantage of a senile old man? (8/31/2012 9:59:20 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: marie2 I didn't say that anyone "here" "claimed" anything. I used to the term "general implication". Just look around you....The media, the social networking sites, the jokes, the various message boards etc. It's been all over the place today....."Any which way but Lucid" "Is Clint senile?" "Was Clint exploited?" etc etc. Broad, rhetorical speech is only permitted for liberals. Non-Obamabots will be held to the highest semantical standards. Especially when the Dems have nothing else. [:D]

Hillwilliam -> RE: Did the RNC take advantage of a senile old man? (8/31/2012 10:17:42 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TheHeretic quote: ORIGINAL: marie2 I didn't say that anyone "here" "claimed" anything. I used to the term "general implication". Just look around you....The media, the social networking sites, the jokes, the various message boards etc. It's been all over the place today....."Any which way but Lucid" "Is Clint senile?" "Was Clint exploited?" etc etc. Broad, rhetorical speech is only permitted for liberals. Non-Obamabots will be held to the highest semantical standards. Especially when the Dems have nothing else. [:D] Translation. I and My acolyte made unsubstanciable claims. Therefore, I must immediately change the subject. marie said this: "The general implication that he's gone senile and didn't realize he was actually talking to an empty chair is preposterous" I just asked who had said he didnt know he was talking to an empty chair because of all the wierd claims Ive heard regarding the Eastwood speech, that one is the wierdest so far and I hadn't seen it as yet. As for "Broad Rhetorical speech", lets just call it what it is. Bullshit.

Musicmystery -> RE: Did the RNC take advantage of a senile old man? (8/31/2012 10:19:02 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: marie2 quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam quote: ORIGINAL: marie2 oy. You made a claim. Please back it up. Who here claimed that he didnt know he was talking to a chair? I didn't say that anyone "here" "claimed" anything. I used the term "general implication". Just look around you....The media, the social networking sites, the jokes, the various message boards etc. It's been all over the place today....."Any which way but Lucid" "Is Clint senile?" "Was Clint exploited?" etc etc. Edited for a typo. The "general implication" was that you did make a claim. You even posted rebuttal.

Musicmystery -> RE: Did the RNC take advantage of a senile old man? (8/31/2012 10:21:24 PM)
quote: Broad, rhetorical speech is only permitted for liberals. Non-Obamabots will be held to the highest semantical standards. Especially when the Dems have nothing else. Well here's the problem, Rich--if Romney/Ryan have a great plan, why the need to lie? Why open that door? And yes, the same applies to Obama's distortions.

marie2 -> RE: Did the RNC take advantage of a senile old man? (8/31/2012 10:34:13 PM)
quote: The "general implication" was that you did make a claim. You even posted rebuttal. I don't engage in passive aggression. It leads no where and it's just a vehicle for people to create an argument and an opportunity to take anger out on one another. Only problem is I'm not pissed, emotionally involved in the discussion, or out for anyone's blood. I made a statement of my thoughts on the OP's topic, from a completely objective point of view. Nothing more, nothing less. Have a good evening.

DaddySatyr -> RE: Did the RNC take advantage of a senile old man? (8/31/2012 10:55:24 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam Translation. I and My acolyte made unsubstanciable claims. Therefore, I must immediately change the subject. marie said this: "The general implication that he's gone senile and didn't realize he was actually talking to an empty chair is preposterous" I just asked who had said he didnt know he was talking to an empty chair because of all the wierd claims Ive heard regarding the Eastwood speech, that one is the wierdest so far and I hadn't seen it as yet. As for "Broad Rhetorical speech", lets just call it what it is. Bullshit. I have to go with Marie on this. I have had a week from hell without much ability to keep up with things. I've been going through my CE courses for license renewal (In my state, your license lapses on the last day of your birthmonth even if you got your license in March, like I did) and other wildfires, hitting my desk, at work. As a result, the best I've been able to do is catch short snippets of radio talk and the occasional flash (without sound) on a scroll in the diner or restaurant where I'm trying to eat without hurting myself. The little bits I was able to pick up today were people (mostly the "known" lefties) musing out loud if poor ol' Clint shouldn't be in a home somewhere or his kids shouldn't be taking care of him because he's obviously lost it. One guy (I could only listen for about ten minutes) seemed like he was preparing Clint's eulogy. I think the term "general implication" is fair because no one is willing to come right out and say: "Clint is suffering from dementia" but, they're sure throwing hints that would be obvious to the most politically tone-deaf amongst us. Peace and comfort, Michael

Aylee -> RE: Did the RNC take advantage of a senile old man? (8/31/2012 11:37:08 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: servantforuse Those on the 'left', and there are many here on collarme, don't see it that way. marie2, you are exactly right.. It is because he made fun of Obama. You are not supposed to do that. After all, those on the left LOVE old people. Until they ridicule Obama. BTW, do you know if any of the fact checkers have claimed that, “We all know that Biden is the intellect of the Democratic Party.” is a lie yet? [:D]

tazzygirl -> RE: Did the RNC take advantage of a senile old man? (9/1/2012 2:59:46 AM)
quote: I adored Clint.... watched every movie, loved him until he split with his first wife to get off with the dumb bitch sondra locke. Still he had the charm, I didnt care about his politics. Watching him last night, I almost cried for what was, and how far he has gone.. It was almost as creepy as watching a reagan hologram would have been. Rich angry old white man, trying to cling to the glory days. He fit in perfectly http://thehill.com/video/gop-convention-tampa/246885-gov-walker-i-cringed-at-clint-eastwoods-speech-

JanahX -> RE: Did the RNC take advantage of a senile old man? (9/1/2012 4:05:12 AM)
All that came to mind was: What a bunch of fucking idiots - same thought that passes through my mind when I see any political hoo-ha as of late. I wish he would of brought up the subject of rape-babies. That would of just put the icing on the cake.

thishereboi -> RE: Did the RNC take advantage of a senile old man? (9/1/2012 4:14:58 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam quote: ORIGINAL: marie2 This. The general implication that he's gone senile and didn't realize he was actually talking to an empty chair is preposterous. Would you care to point out someone who has done that? Did you read the op or the thread title?

Politesub53 -> RE: Did the RNC take advantage of a senile old man? (9/1/2012 4:29:32 AM)
Loved Clints speech about bringing the troops home tomorrow, to huge cheers from the audience. He should have checked with Mitt first though. [8\|] http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/07/16/top_senators_can_t_explain_romney_s_afghanistan_policy. Romney has said he will increase military tactics, reduce the defecit, not raise taxes. No doubt the dupes think all this can somehow be done without money.

Musicmystery -> RE: Did the RNC take advantage of a senile old man? (9/1/2012 7:01:49 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: marie2 quote: The "general implication" was that you did make a claim. You even posted rebuttal. I don't engage in passive aggression. It leads no where and it's just a vehicle for people to create an argument and an opportunity to take anger out on one another. Only problem is I'm not pissed, emotionally involved in the discussion, or out for anyone's blood. I made a statement of my thoughts on the OP's topic, from a completely objective point of view. Nothing more, nothing less. Have a good evening. You're not big on comprehension either, though you're tall on assumptions and misconceptions. What does anger or passive aggression have to do with anything? Are you under the impression every discussion among people who don't agree is emotionally charged? That's telling in itself. You made a claim, and when asked to support it, ran for the hills and the excuses, and someone called you on it. Life goes on.

Hillwilliam -> RE: Did the RNC take advantage of a senile old man? (9/1/2012 7:04:28 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam quote: ORIGINAL: marie2 This. The general implication that he's gone senile and didn't realize he was actually talking to an empty chair is preposterous. Would you care to point out someone who has done that? Did you read the op or the thread title? It says nothing about "not knowing he was talking to a chair" which is the claim I asked for clarification on.

Musicmystery -> RE: Did the RNC take advantage of a senile old man? (9/1/2012 7:04:54 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 Loved Clints speech about bringing the troops home tomorrow, to huge cheers from the audience. He should have checked with Mitt first though. [8\|] http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/07/16/top_senators_can_t_explain_romney_s_afghanistan_policy. Romney has said he will increase military tactics, reduce the defecit, not raise taxes. No doubt the dupes think all this can somehow be done without money. Republicans are the Party of Magic Money. Just cut taxes and manna falls from heaven. Except it doesn't, and never has. But it will this time! Except it won't. But we'll do it anyway, because it redistributes resources to the top at the expense of the middle and bottom, and so far people are still clinging to this lie, despite no jobs, no growth, believing we're going bankrupt when all we're doing is cutting the revenue to fund it.

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.09375