RE: Online training... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


Vancouver_cinful -> RE: Online training... (6/13/2006 4:50:00 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: carolsea

Well, then, cin, I must have misread too.

shrugs
Carolsea



Well, I'm not sure AAkasha is going to come back and clarify, but until she does I think I stand by my first interpretation.




AAkasha -> RE: Online training... (6/13/2006 7:06:51 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: carolsea

Do you mean to say that an indication of so-called "TRUE submission" is that a person can sit at their keyboard, say they're something that they're not (old/young, male/female, etc.) and be conducting an online game a chess or (name your favorite computer game), saying they're doing one thing when they're really doing another?

Oh yes, I'm touching myself, oooh baby!!

Yeah, WAY different than in real life.  In real life you have the person right there in front of you, and you KNOW what they're doing, what they are, and whether or not they're just flat out laughing at you!

Puhleez!!

Carolsea

quote:

ORIGINAL: jadedshadow

 Submitting online takes TRUE submission. Yes there are a lot of pitfalls, but it is so in r/t as well (yes I have experienced both). It takes time, trust, love, patience, and lots and lots of understanding as well as accepting mistakes and moving past them - learning and living.. not much different there than in real life is it? <snip>



This is the kind of ignorance I am talking about.  People think online domination is about typing "ooh I am touching myself."  If you have such a limited imagination that you believe it's about having this kind of exchange, no wonder you don't get anything out of it. I would not with you, either!

The most erotic part of a person is their brain.  Our hot buttons reside in our psyche.  The eroticism that comes from BDSM begins in the brain and the way we process our kinks.  Without a brain, an imagination, a fantasy, there really is very little left of BDSM other than a series of actions.

Those people who cannot figure out how to erotically charge someone through words, imagery, and connecting to the brain and think that this kind of connection is "less" than real life simply are unable to get their brain around it, or they are lazy, or maybe not literate. I can get my head around the idea that some people don't like words, sentences, essays, erotica, reading or taking the time to put words together; however, this place (collarme) is a written medium where people spend time typing words to communicate and sometimes move one another.  So, we've eliminated the vast number of people out there who hate to write, type, or use words to communicate.

Still, such resistance to the idea that someone who can visualize an idea, capture it into words, communicate it to another and cause an erotic reaction in them -- wow, that's not good enough, that's not real?  I am a snob because my standards are that I want a man that can not only stimulate me physically, but use words -- either in an electronic medium -- or, does anyone remember pen and paper? -- to also rock my world?  The best lovers I've had were so "in tune" with my kinks because they could relate to them, communicate them, and stimulate them through the use of written words.  Our "boring" cybersex or online domination (or his online submission) consisted of mini works of art when measured in impact it had on both of our lustful sides.

I guess you could say the same about photography.  People will scoff and think the exchanging of digitical photos to eroticize a long distance relationship is "stupid" or "lame" or "doesn't do anything" --  well, yeah, you are probably thinking of a cock shot or a woman pinching her own nipple with her legs open.  I'm talking about someone having the ability to know my brain so well he can photograph and capture an erotic moment that is so hot I can barely look at the photo without shaking all over.

Perhaps I am overly sensitive and extremely sensual and an odd animal in that words, photographs and imagery -- when done right -- can really rock my world.  Does it replace real life domination? Of course not, it never will.  But for those of you that say you " get nothing out of it" I would venture you either put nothing into it, or you have a really limited imaginination. 

Slamming online domination just gives some people their chance to feel elite by saying they'd never stoop to such a low level; in reality, those that can do it should be proud.  It demonstrates your ability to use the most important part of the erotic soul -- the brain.

Akasha




ExistentialSteel -> RE: Online training... (6/13/2006 7:58:20 PM)

I repeat my previous post, more or less. Those who don't find it easy to write and read well, negate the online experience that hinges on the use of  words. Those who read and write well vociferiously defend the practice.




Brosco -> RE: Online training... (6/14/2006 12:25:02 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ExistentialSteel

I repeat my previous post, more or less. Those who don't find it easy to write and read well, negate the online experience that hinges on the use of  words. Those who read and write well vociferiously defend the practice.


As usual we have a person that has misconceptions of online try to minimise the interaction.

I must be strange, but when i see something that i dont understand, I ask questions.. instead of trivialise with preconceptions and stating them as fact.

Brosco




ExistentialSteel -> RE: Online training... (6/14/2006 3:24:55 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brosco

quote:

ORIGINAL: ExistentialSteel

I repeat my previous post, more or less. Those who don't find it easy to write and read well, negate the online experience that hinges on the use of  words. Those who read and write well vociferiously defend the practice.


As usual we have a person that has misconceptions of online try to minimise the interaction.

I must be strange, but when i see something that i dont understand, I ask questions.. instead of trivialise with preconceptions and stating them as fact.

Brosco


I don't know if you are strange, but I'm not sure you understood what I was saying.. What did I say that makes you think I am a minimalist in regards to online relationships? That was clearly the opposite of my point.




Brosco -> RE: Online training... (6/14/2006 3:34:07 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ExistentialSteel

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brosco

quote:

ORIGINAL: ExistentialSteel

I repeat my previous post, more or less. Those who don't find it easy to write and read well, negate the online experience that hinges on the use of  words. Those who read and write well vociferiously defend the practice.


As usual we have a person that has misconceptions of online try to minimise the interaction.

I must be strange, but when i see something that i dont understand, I ask questions.. instead of trivialise with preconceptions and stating them as fact.

Brosco


I don't know if you are strange, but I'm not sure you understood what I was saying.. What did I say that makes you think I am a minimalist in regards to online relationships? That was clearly the opposite of my point.


In answer to your question that online does rely (or vary) based on the ability to use the written word - and man... if i relied on that there would be no relationship - but with online there is voice, cam and for the written word, many areas, like forums, blogs, etc that can be spelled checked.

I suggest that you really base your knowledge of online based on preconceptions when you think its all just the written word.

Brosco




ExistentialSteel -> RE: Online training... (6/14/2006 3:41:32 AM)

Brosco, so you are saying that you don't put much stock into the written word in online relationships, but rely more on cams and voice?

That is interesting and I readily admit those are facets of the internet that I wasn't thinking about when I posted. I was gearing mine more towards chatting, emails and message boards.




Brosco -> RE: Online training... (6/14/2006 4:06:34 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ExistentialSteel

Brosco, so you are saying that you don't put much stock into the written word in online relationships, but rely more on cams and voice?

That is interesting and I readily admit those are facets of the internet that I wasn't thinking about when I posted. I was gearing mine more towards chatting, emails and message boards.


If we are having a serious conversation and not just opening another oppurtunity for a slam, i answer:

I can only answer for me, but voice is essesntial...  maybe i can trust voice so much ...  i believe i can read so much there.

For me, i would always promote not using a cam...  there is too much chance of it being used in a nagative way later (like photos and home-video)

chatting, emails and message boards are an enhancement that all can use.. on of offline - maybe when apart ...  or a journal entry to convey a thought - online can be used by all.

Brosco





ExistentialSteel -> RE: Online training... (6/14/2006 4:11:56 AM)

Bosco, thanks for clarifying for me. I was seriously asking. I will say that online relationships I have had, quickly go to the phone stage if we are seriously going to meet. So you and I are really not too far apart with the way we do things.




carolsea -> RE: Online training... (6/19/2006 3:36:45 PM)

LOL I love this!!!  way to go, Invictus!!
Carolsea

quote:

ORIGINAL: Invictus754
<snip>
All I see is someone phishing for money. Of course - I also factored in the poor spelling, bad grammar and incorrect use of the apostrophe.  This is how I envision her (well, plus a WalMart whip and her husband inside the trailer opening the Alpo for dinner) :
 
[image]http://www.garysweetman.com/web%20images/FASH-Trailer%20trash.jpg[/image]





carolsea -> RE: Online training... (6/19/2006 3:42:40 PM)

No, my dear, that is not ignorance.  I have DONE what you describe below, and I know how erotic and powerful it can be from both sides of the screen.  It's the knowledge that the online experience can only go so far for me, and then I have to have human contact.  My problem was with your use of the term "True Submission"- but then I have a problem with the use of the word "true" in connection with a lot of nouns, such as dominant, submissive, way, religion, road to salvation, ETC.  So don't flatter yourself in thinking that you know something that I don't.

It's just like phone sex - you can be doing anything on the other end of the line and still get the other person off, but that's not a "true" sexual encounter.  Well, except for the one masturbating there alone with the phone in his/her hand!

LOL

Carolsea

quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha

quote:

ORIGINAL: carolsea

Do you mean to say that an indication of so-called "TRUE submission" is that a person can sit at their keyboard, say they're something that they're not (old/young, male/female, etc.) and be conducting an online game a chess or (name your favorite computer game), saying they're doing one thing when they're really doing another?

Oh yes, I'm touching myself, oooh baby!!

Yeah, WAY different than in real life.  In real life you have the person right there in front of you, and you KNOW what they're doing, what they are, and whether or not they're just flat out laughing at you!

Puhleez!!

Carolsea

quote:

ORIGINAL: jadedshadow

 Submitting online takes TRUE submission. Yes there are a lot of pitfalls, but it is so in r/t as well (yes I have experienced both). It takes time, trust, love, patience, and lots and lots of understanding as well as accepting mistakes and moving past them - learning and living.. not much different there than in real life is it? <snip>



This is the kind of ignorance I am talking about.  People think online domination is about typing "ooh I am touching myself."  If you have such a limited imagination that you believe it's about having this kind of exchange, no wonder you don't get anything out of it. I would not with you, either!

The most erotic part of a person is their brain.  Our hot buttons reside in our psyche.  The eroticism that comes from BDSM begins in the brain and the way we process our kinks.  Without a brain, an imagination, a fantasy, there really is very little left of BDSM other than a series of actions.

Those people who cannot figure out how to erotically charge someone through words, imagery, and connecting to the brain and think that this kind of connection is "less" than real life simply are unable to get their brain around it, or they are lazy, or maybe not literate. I can get my head around the idea that some people don't like words, sentences, essays, erotica, reading or taking the time to put words together; however, this place (collarme) is a written medium where people spend time typing words to communicate and sometimes move one another.  So, we've eliminated the vast number of people out there who hate to write, type, or use words to communicate.

Still, such resistance to the idea that someone who can visualize an idea, capture it into words, communicate it to another and cause an erotic reaction in them -- wow, that's not good enough, that's not real?  I am a snob because my standards are that I want a man that can not only stimulate me physically, but use words -- either in an electronic medium -- or, does anyone remember pen and paper? -- to also rock my world?  The best lovers I've had were so "in tune" with my kinks because they could relate to them, communicate them, and stimulate them through the use of written words.  Our "boring" cybersex or online domination (or his online submission) consisted of mini works of art when measured in impact it had on both of our lustful sides.

I guess you could say the same about photography.  People will scoff and think the exchanging of digitical photos to eroticize a long distance relationship is "stupid" or "lame" or "doesn't do anything" --  well, yeah, you are probably thinking of a cock shot or a woman pinching her own nipple with her legs open.  I'm talking about someone having the ability to know my brain so well he can photograph and capture an erotic moment that is so hot I can barely look at the photo without shaking all over.

Perhaps I am overly sensitive and extremely sensual and an odd animal in that words, photographs and imagery -- when done right -- can really rock my world.  Does it replace real life domination? Of course not, it never will.  But for those of you that say you " get nothing out of it" I would venture you either put nothing into it, or you have a really limited imaginination. 

Slamming online domination just gives some people their chance to feel elite by saying they'd never stoop to such a low level; in reality, those that can do it should be proud.  It demonstrates your ability to use the most important part of the erotic soul -- the brain.

Akasha





carolsea -> RE: Online training... (6/19/2006 3:44:17 PM)

Another broad generalization that is not necessarily true.  I read and write very well, thank you very much, English major, Writer, Communicator.... etc etc - Having tried both, I just happen to prefer the real thing to fantasy.

Carolsea


quote:

ORIGINAL: ExistentialSteel

I repeat my previous post, more or less. Those who don't find it easy to write and read well, negate the online experience that hinges on the use of  words. Those who read and write well vociferiously defend the practice.




Noah -> RE: Online training... (6/19/2006 6:27:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: chains314


Superior couple with the female as the main domme, into cuckhold slaves, humilation,sissies,forced bi, consentual blackmail,wallet raping, human atm's
Tributes will be expect !
THIS has-to be some kind of joke


What you said, Chains.

It gives the impression that the matter at hand has nothing to do with kink and everything to do with entrepreneurship. What a great way to make a buck! Here's a bunch of people we can take advantage of! Systematically change just a few words in the original post and it could appear in a forum for people hoping to run temporay mall kiosks for some extra holiday cash.


"I'm a Goddess; the Goddess Of So Clueless I Have To Beg Tips From Strangers On How To Prostitute Myself" Christ, if you're a Goddess now, what are you gonna graduate too once you learn which end of a spreader bar belongs up your ass?

I think prostitution can be done well or badly, morally or immorally, but when is starts with self-delusion and proceeds with denial of the nature of the project at hand, I expect that the end will be equally impressive.




caitlyn -> RE: Online training... (6/19/2006 7:22:56 PM)

I don't know much about online D/s, but really enjoyed your post Mistress Akasha, and admire your bravery to speak your mind about a topic that is obviously unpopular here.
 
To be honest, I don't get the hostility of some people ... first because what other people do is really nobody else's business, and second, I'm just under twenty years old and have had a lifetime of loser offline relationships.
 
I guess I should just come online and profess that all offline relationships suck, and that offline men are losers, liars, guys that want to fuck your friends, and guys that get drunk and think you're their own personal beater.[;)]
 
Much respect to you, Mistress. [:D]




Brosco -> RE: Online training... (6/19/2006 9:46:05 PM)

quote:


To be honest, I don't get the hostility of some people ... first because what other people do is really nobody else's business, ........................


From what I see there seems to be people that fail to comprehend that we are all individuals and we react in different ways.  They fail to comprehend anything outside their own reality.  Some go to the extend of being hostile because anyone outside their reality cannot possibly be honest.

OK, I going to use a long winded non-D/s analogy here, so please feel free to skip this post altogether.

Our minds can be stimulated or react differently to each other.  Some people 'think' in pictures, some people are more emotionally motivated, others need the solidity of touch and feel.  Take MS Windows for example - look at all the lovely little icons that many people can intuitively see a meaning to.  Look at the top of this IExplorer page with all its little icon shortcuts - it is such a wonderful concept for people that think in pictures.  A picture replaces a thousand words, some will justify, but for me the 1000 words confuse the hell out of me when I find that -->Menu-->File--->Save As...   says it all.  After being in computers all my life and using Windows and the net since their inception, it was only a year ago that it became intuitive to me that the strange lil icon up there with 2 arrows going around in circles meant 'Refresh'!  You can imagine how hard it is for me to decipher or find what I want from some of the others.  Its because I don't think in pictures like the majority.  Its also why there is the text menu bar as an alternive.  If Microsoft thought pictures said it all, the menu bar would have disappeared years ago.

So when someone says that they cannot comprehend how a hug can be achieved online, they are missing out on understanding the way different people's minds work.  A hug is a physical way to communicate a feeling to another's mind - but it isn't the only way to convey the feeling , nor is it the best way for all.  Has anyone here ever, say, been in bed with their partner and tried to convey all of the love and affection they feel with a wordless hug? - and got very little response?  Some will need the words to respond to before the mind fully comprehends what the hug means. 

Ok, I accept that I have taken extremes in the examples, but the reality is there are different ways to communicate and you will be closest with a person if you understand the best way to convey a message to the other's mind.  If you find the best way to convey love, affection, support etc., thru a hug, you may well find difficultly in expressing those same feelings thru written word or down a phone line.  If you have a partner that needs to hear the words, but you are only fully comfortable with the wordless hug - you prolly move on with a feeling of - 'well, we just didn't connect'.

Most people are able to use all forms of communication to an extent - but depending on circumstances will have varying degrees of confidence when their choices are limited.  Some need the very specific forms.  We are all different.

Brosco




Misstoyou -> RE: Online training... (6/19/2006 10:09:41 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ExistentialSteel

Those who read and write well vociferiously defend the practice.



Not necessarily.

I think imagination has a lot to do with it, and apparently mine is lacking. I suck at being an online mistress, because I can never think of anything I want a submissive to do online that would really be a service to me. Well, there was this one time that a submissive was writing a novel for me, beginning with short stories, and then a novel, a chapter a day, but that was the exception. [:)]




aellea -> RE: Online training... (6/19/2006 10:38:01 PM)

if all anyone is capable of is online then for them it's real.  if they are housebound, it might very well be all they have.  it's the walk a mile in another man's/woman's shoes before you can off them!!!

when i first came online it was real enough for me as i got all sweaty and stuttery when i tried to think what to type.  now i could... oh who cares what i could do... *winks*.  of course i've not done that for quite a few years and after having some real life experience, not enough but some, it's a walk in the park.  i don't care for it, it's not my cup of tea but it was a great initiation for me and i learned quite a bit.  Pete and James will always be Masters in my thoughts for the many hours of time and patience they gave me (and maybe the carpal tunnel syndrome as well!)  real life rocks... bring it on!




aellea -> RE: Online training... (6/19/2006 10:39:50 PM)

just gotta see what comes next at 51 posts!




carolsea -> RE: Online training... (6/25/2006 10:15:56 AM)

Wow - 78 posts.  Thank Goddess, maybe it's over!!! LOL




LadyMorgynn -> RE: Online training... (6/25/2006 10:18:47 AM)

nah, 'cause you just posted and got it started again ;)

I missed you last night! xoxoxo

quote:

ORIGINAL: carolsea

Wow - 78 posts.  Thank Goddess, maybe it's over!!! LOL




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875