ThrowAway88 -> RE: He's Clearly Vanilla (9/15/2012 10:19:50 AM)
|
Thank you for this. It's a good question. I mean both. I'm not... How do I phrase this... Excessive in what I want. I'm happiest in a loving D/s relationship. It feels pretty standard to me but I've run the gamut and explored what exactly my brand of submission is and it's fairly tame. I'm a 1950's, vanilla looking on the outside, kinky in the bedroom, worshiping, eager to please, content with tasks and rituals, loves to be praised, trained and molded kind of girl. Does that make sense? Maybe that's excessive. It feels pretty basic. But he is not the opposite of that. He is kind and gentle, thoughtful, wants me to be happy, independent, honest and intelligent... But he's not dominant. He's not submissive by any means just... Independent. The short of that though is no, not everyone can do that. quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus Here's where I need some clarification... what do you mean by "submission"? Do you mean, serving and following? Because anyone can do that. Do you mean kinky sex? Because anyone can do that to, to a degree. I am a domly dom bossy broad. I am a serious perv. I am a fingerpaint-in-blood sadist. If I had to, would give up any one of those for "perfect"? IN A HEARTBEAT. Would I take my little breaks into perversity, in whatever manner we agreed on? Sure. But yes, the kink would absolutely go by the wayside if I had everything else.
|
|
|
|