DesideriScuri
Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: tazzygirl quote:
OMG!!! My parents are fucking liars!!! Both said they graduated from HS! And, my Dad even said he graduated from college. How could he have done that since the DoEd wasn't even around yet?!?!?!? rofl The NCAA does the collegiate graduation rates.... didnt you know that? No way. You said that was the DoEd. Which is it now? quote:
quote:
I'm assuming that by "program" you are referring to the DoEd. And, I agree NCLB needs to be repealed. Yesterday wouldn't be soon enough. But, has the DoEd even come close to fulfilling it's purpose? Has our academic achievement gotten better since it's creation? Nope, and it wont as long as our politicians keep raiding it. Politicians are raiding the DoEd now, too?!? If only they could spend just a few more million bucks, we'd finally get our money's worth, right? LMAO quote:
quote:
The Fed's aren't leveling any playing field. Gimme a break. And, that's an acknowledgement that corruption is acceptable. And you think corruption doesnt happen at a local level? even after your tirade about your son's school? Tirade? You need to go back and read it again. It was actually praise that they were forward thinking and had been running tight enough budgets that a decrease in funding wasn't going to require an increase in tax rates for 5+ years. quote:
quote:
And it takes a college education to be able to change a fuel injector? Seriously? That's laughable. Nope, it takes a college education to make the money that comes with being a certified mechanic. Um, what's that now? You're saying that a kid has to go to college to make the money that comes with being a certified mechanic? Is that your way of saying that you can't be a certified mechanic without going through college? http://www.ase.com/Tests.aspx http://www.bls.gov/ooh/installation-maintenance-and-repair/home.htm quote:
quote:
This has nothing to do with the DoEd. Jr. can get a job and put himself through college (my ex did just that). It might take him longer, but he'll be better off having had to go through that (even the President and First Lady acknowledge they would not have achieved as much as they have had they not had to fight through what they went through for their educations). Instead of putting the responsibility for a kid's advancement onto the parents, you are putting it onto the community, state and nation. You know that whoever is holding the purse strings is the one that makes the decisions, right? Your desire for the Federal government to pay for a kid's education isn't anything less than advocating for a kid to be beholden to government for that education. And, since it's not exactly the Fed's money (it's the taxpayers' money), does a taxpayer get a say? I think the responsibility for education falls upon everyone. Instead of saying.. I got fucked to get mine, I will fuck you before you get yours.... we need to educate our youth for a better tomorrow. Without an appreciation for what an education takes and means, simply gifting an education to some isn't worth the effort. quote:
quote:
Why do those areas not have any choice in schools? What is stopping them? I find that school choice is more heavily opposed by Unions and Democrats (probably mostly because the Democrats are heavily supported by Unions, not necessarily because Democrats are opposed to school choices). What is preventing a community from having a choice in school? Most of the communities I have lived in werent unionized and had little to no choices in alternative schooling. There goes your theory. All the communities I've lived in are union-heavy, and there are shit tons of options. There are two "environmental" charter schools within 10 minutes of my house. There is a technical school within the city limits. The local airport has an aircraft mechanic program for high school kids (instead of vo-ag, or auto-tech, it's aircraft mechanic tech). There's a performing arts charter school in the downtown area. The local high school kids that qualify can take some courses at the local colleges for credit (at little extra expense to the parents). That wasn't available when I was in high school. And, there are also career-centered schools available for high school students that give them an education into specific careers, like auto mechanics, catering/foodservice, agricultural studies, etc. Not every area has them, but every area I've ever lived in (including the po-dunk place I grew up) had access to them (I had never heard of charter schools until after I got out of college, so that's a relatively new phenomenon to me. quote:
quote:
Not at all. It truly is the only way to provide a level playing field for each kid. No its not, its just your knee jerk reaction to something you dont wish to acknowledge. quote:
There are not many ways. A livable wage? I picked up a foreclosure recently. The people before me lost the house because they couldn't refinance their 3 mortgages. I'm sure it had nothing to do with their drinking, the drug use and sales,or their choosing to live off welfare. They stopped having trash pickup because they couldn't afford it. Two satellite dishes, cell phones, boats, vehicles, etc. they could afford. Trash pick up, they couldn't. After the family had been evicted, the County Health Dept. was called because of rat infestation. By the end of the following week, the garbage had been picked up... 4 huge rolloffs filled with garbage and a steady back and forth of garbage trucks took care of everything. Hell, I have seen that in rich neighborhoods with adults who had fantastic jobs and couldnt keep the drugs out of their noses, or end the martini lunches, or the man lost all his wealth in derivatives. One example.. hell.. even 100.. doesnt make your case. And the anecdotal evidence doesn't make yours, either, tazzy. quote:
quote:
Livable wages, "viable" educational systems (why don't we already have a viable one?), and free college education will cost everyone more, and won't benefit everyone more. In my area, costs keep going up and up, yet results aren't keeping up. Throwing more and more money at the problem isn't going to fix anything. Money isn't the problem. And yet countries with better educational scores than ours manage to do just that. Makes ya wonder huh Nope, it doesn't. Talk to any relatively new asian immigrants and find out about their attitudes towards schooling. It proves my point. Money isn't going to change a kid's attitude about school. Money isn't going to change a parent's attitude about school. How long has it been known that a degree will tend to get you a better job, making more money? How many kids don't graduate? My father has had to go to expulsion hearings where mom's and/or dad's have pleaded with him to let lil ricky stay in school because he's finally going to work hard at school. One kid was denied public schooling because he was too old to stay in public school. Before he turned 21, he had earned 2.5 credits. 6/7 years of "free" education and all he could muster was 2.5 credits. Education isn't the only way out of poverty. It can be a great way, but the best way out of poverty is a job. An education can make it quicker, but that's not guaranteed, either.
_____________________________
What I support: - A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
- Personal Responsibility
- Help for the truly needy
- Limited Government
- Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
|