RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


mnottertail -> RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case (10/6/2012 9:42:58 AM)

And the point of that shit is what?  That not only is there alot of selective fantasy, but you are not facile with spell check? 




tazzygirl -> RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case (10/6/2012 9:44:03 AM)

And if he had NOT followed, all this would be a moot point, wouldnt it.




Raiikun -> RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case (10/6/2012 9:44:12 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Louve00

This is absolutely false. A face to face confrontation doesn't happen when one sits obligingly in his truck, waiting for the police to arrive.



Non-sequiter. The second sentence does not make the first true.

I suggest you brush up on the evidence before claiming things are "absolutely false" that have no support in the evidence for being absolutely false.




Raiikun -> RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case (10/6/2012 9:45:45 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

And if he had NOT followed, all this would be a moot point, wouldnt it.


If Trayvon hadn't turned around to the T intersection after George ceased following at dispatcher's advice, this would all be a moot point.




tazzygirl -> RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case (10/6/2012 9:46:48 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun


quote:

ORIGINAL: Louve00

This is absolutely false. A face to face confrontation doesn't happen when one sits obligingly in his truck, waiting for the police to arrive.



Non-sequiter. The second sentence does not make the first true.

I suggest you brush up on the evidence before claiming things are "absolutely false" that have no support in the evidence for being absolutely false.


According to the recording, it does. George started following when Trayvon ... now make sure you read this part.... ran.

George would not have needed to follow him if Trayvon was running towards him.




mnottertail -> RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case (10/6/2012 9:47:17 AM)

We haven't a shred of evidence for that.




Rule -> RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case (10/6/2012 9:48:47 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun
Heh, as Trayvon's cousin put it:

"Cracka got madd kause he got dem bangaz put 2 em by a young nigga"

So Martin had a cousin who is a racist. How about the rest of his relatives?




tazzygirl -> RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case (10/6/2012 9:49:16 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

And if he had NOT followed, all this would be a moot point, wouldnt it.


If Trayvon hadn't turned around to the T intersection after George ceased following at dispatcher's advice, this would all be a moot point.


If George was still where he told the dispatcher where he was, he wouldnt have needed to tell them to have the police call him when they arrived to tell them where he was.

Your logic here is extremely flawed.

George had already told the dispatcher where he was. They told him he wasnt needed to follow. He did, moving far enough away from his truck that the police would not see him.




Louve00 -> RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case (10/6/2012 9:49:53 AM)

I maintain, Raiikun, it is you who are absolutely false and all assuming in this. I am not going to waste a beautiful day in sunny Florida arguing this. (Sunny, until the rain gets here, that is)

Ciao [8D]




Raiikun -> RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case (10/6/2012 10:07:22 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


They told him he wasnt needed to follow. He did, moving far enough away from his truck that the police would not see him.



He was not at the truck when advised not to follow.

And legally it has no relevance. George was under no obligation at all to stay at the truck.




Raiikun -> RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case (10/6/2012 10:09:39 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


According to the recording, it does. George started following when Trayvon ... now make sure you read this part.... ran.



I've never disputed that George got out of the truck and followed him at first. Kindly don't argue as if I have; that's dishonest on your part.

That moment is not contemporaneous with the encounter, and thus has no legal relevance though. The part at issue is did he continue following AFTER being advised not to.

Evidence points to "No."




tazzygirl -> RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case (10/6/2012 10:21:56 AM)

He complained, after being told not to follow, that Trayvon ran again. lol... never did he say Trayvon was running towards him.... your argument still holds no water. Trayvon was running away.. George followed.

That evidence is in the 911 transcripts.




Raiikun -> RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case (10/6/2012 10:31:29 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

He complained, after being told not to follow, that Trayvon ran again. lol...



He was referring to the same instance of running, indicating he no longer had sight of Trayvon.

quote:

Trayvon was running away.. George followed.


Until being advised not to. No further evidence of following exists after.




tazzygirl -> RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case (10/6/2012 10:48:45 AM)

http://floppingaces.net/2012/04/03/the-martinzimmerman-timeline-reader-post/

According to this audio he didnt stop when told not to follow.




Raiikun -> RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case (10/6/2012 11:13:39 AM)

That makes the same unfounded assumptions being made here.

Edit: Then I continued reading past the part where it seemed to imply Zimmerman stayed 30 seconds behind Martin and get to the end, where he writes:

"Martin had over two minutes to reach Green residence. Why didn’t he go there? This suggests strongly that Martin did not go to the Green residence, but instead hid somewhere, waiting for Zimmerman, and then confronted Zimmerman. Martin spoke first to Zimmerman, not the other way around. I think Martin approached Zimmerman’s car from the direction of the clubhouse, passed the car and then bolted. Martin then rounded the corner and hid. Zimmerman pursued until being asked to stop but lost Martin. As Zimmerman turned to head back to his car, Martin came out of hiding and confronted Zimmerman. The rest is history."




tazzygirl -> RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case (10/6/2012 11:32:48 AM)

I was not referring to their conclusions, I posted that merely for the audio




DomYngBlk -> RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case (10/6/2012 11:38:17 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk
Why do people want to keep putting that lie out there. No trauma to his head.

If I recall correctly: Zimmerman's nose was broken, his face and/or head was swollen, and he had two vertical lacerations to his head. That is a lot of trauma.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk
Man, if I beat your head against the ground your ass would be in the hospital.

I propose that you do not beat my head against the ground. Unless you are an animal?

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk
You want to let the white boy go free......Its fine. Just be fucking honest about it.

That is a racist remark. It is good that you show your true colors and bias.



Does he have a hospital report that says all that? If so, where the fuck is it. Two if he did have all that his ass isn't going for no gun.

Racist or not. Just telling you what will happen.





DomYngBlk -> RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case (10/6/2012 11:40:27 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun

Heh, as Trayvon's cousin put it:

"Cracka got madd kause he got dem bangaz put 2 em by a young nigga"


SMFH.....




Raiikun -> RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case (10/6/2012 11:43:21 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk

Does he have a hospital report that says all that?



Yes there's a medical report diagnosing a broken nose and mentioning his two black eyes. Here's also a summary of the EMT's testimonies:

O’Rourke

Treated him in back of patrol car
one or two lacerations on back of head
what looked like a fractured nose
he cleaned the blood off his head and face
he was covered in a significant amount of blood
it took a while to clean him up
he’d say 45% of his head was covered in blood
there was blood on his cheeks and back in head

Brandy

abrasions on face
a cut on the back of his head
he told an officer he would need to go to hospital and get stitches
officer said ok, he asked if cops would take him or they (EMTs) should, cop said cops would take him
He had a definite laceration to the back of the head
It was pretty big, at least an inch by a half inch wide
There were abrasions on forehead, cheeks and face, his nose was swollen
There was one big cut on the back of his head, it was straight up and down
He had blood on his arms and his hands, they used peroxide to clean him up and wash his hands

Livingstone

He had blood on his face, and what looked like a broken nose
There were two small (one inch) lacerations on the back of his head
One looked deeper than other
They cleaned them so they would stop bleeding
Police asked if he needed to go by ambulance. They told cops he looks like he has a broken nose, may need a stitch or two. After discussion, police told them they would take him and see if he needs stitches
GZ complained to her about his injuries, said he was dizzy
When she was trying to get dried blood off she had to push a little harder, and he said it hurt. He also said his nose hurt.




Raiikun -> RE: Update on Trayvon Martin case (10/6/2012 11:44:34 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk

quote:

ORIGINAL: Raiikun

Heh, as Trayvon's cousin put it:

"Cracka got madd kause he got dem bangaz put 2 em by a young nigga"


SMFH.....


That's an actual tweet from Trayvon's cousin, in case it wasn't clear.




Page: <<   < prev  34 35 [36] 37 38   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875