quote:

ORIGINAL: NiceButMeanGirl

~FR~

Really, no matter how any of us here might answer any questions, that doesn't really matter. What matters is how the people considering a relationship/dynamic with each other will answer them. Are their answers compatible? That's what matters, not our answers. We may all have our opinions, including me, but our opinions don't matter where their possible relationship or compatibility is concerned.

NBMG

quote:

ORIGINAL: TxShrouded
it was about methodologies.

quote:

ORIGINAL: TxShrouded



This is a two part question to which answers of trust, respect, and all other

such generalized answers are instant disqualifiers. Any man standing before a

willing submissive may call himself a Dominant, but when may a Dominant

legitimately and accurately call himself a Master?

quote:

And there are significant 

differences between D/s and M/s, but what is the key element that distinguishes 

the two and why? 

quote:

ORIGINAL: littlewonder

I'm kinda surprised about the answers here. I personally saw nothing at all wrong with the question she asked the op. I would have had no problem answering it for her. I just assumed she asked him so she could figure out just where on the compatibility line he fell. I'm left scratching my head at what exactly the problem was with her question.

quote:

ORIGINAL: littlewonder

I'm kinda surprised about the answers here. I personally saw nothing at all wrong with the question she asked the op. I would have had no problem answering it for her. I just assumed she asked him so she could figure out just where on the compatibility line he fell. I'm left scratching my head at what exactly the problem was with her question.

quote:

ORIGINAL: littlewonder

I just saw her as knowing what she is looking for so she just didn't want to waste her time or another person's. I know when I was single there was some stuff that were disqualifies for me and I made sure those who contacted me knew that. There was no more questions or talk about it if you didn't meet that qualifier. Don't we all have something like that when we're single?

quote:

ORIGINAL: TxShrouded

I contacted someone who asked me the following question. When I did they said I was way off. I want to see how everyone else answers before I post my response. I just want to see how other would answer it....

**********************************************



This is a two part question to which answers of trust, respect, and all other

such generalized answers are instant disqualifiers. Any man standing before a

willing submissive may call himself a Dominant, but when may a Dominant

legitimately and accurately call himself a Master? And there are significant

differences between D/s and M/s, but what is the key element that distinguishes

the two and why?

************************************************

quote:

The person isn't saying everybody has to do it her way. She's saying that her way is the One True Way for herself and what she wants. Sincerely, there is a standard answer for ME and for the dynamics I'm involved in. It's cool that other folks feel it's an area for compromise, but I don't. It's the pretty standard way things are going to happen for anybody who wants to be involved with Me.

quote:

ORIGINAL: littlewonder

I'm kinda surprised about the answers here. I personally saw nothing at all wrong with the question she asked the op. I would have had no problem answering it for her. I just assumed she asked him so she could figure out just where on the compatibility line he fell. I'm left scratching my head at what exactly the problem was with her question.

the reason is.that.you have to be stupid and inexperienced to ask.them.

How.do you see your dominance working is a valid question not that drivel. same goes for.being called master. so your two idiot leather buddies gave you a cap, i will never call you master and if they sobered.up, they wouldnt either.

(in reply to littlewonder)

quote:

ORIGINAL: littlewonder
I'm kinda surprised about the answers here. I personally saw nothing at all wrong with the question she asked the op. I would have had no problem answering it for her. I just assumed she asked him so she could figure out just where on the compatibility line he fell. I'm left scratching my head at what exactly the problem was with her question.

quote:

ORIGINAL: TxShrouded


this was her response:

Honestly i thought the non response would be enough. But if you really want me to just say it, your answer was way off the mark for me personallyand did not come anywhere close to my personalreality. So obviousy the answer is a very big NO. But have fun on CM.

quote:

ORIGINAL: littlewonder

I think it's kinda sad that we even need to add "imo" and "personally" to posts just so we can be all politically correct and so that we don't step in doo doo and everyone get all mad and upset.

It should be implied that EVERYTHING we write here is our own opinion. I absolutely hate that I have to put those in just so I don't get some kind of gold letter or argument.

quote:


Like I said, I don't see what the gal did wrong. So it is her one twue way...so what? I kinda think it was a good thing to ask so that she didn't waste time with someone that wasn't HER one twue way. I remember when I was single I would always ask guys if they saw themselves as D/s or M/s and what they felt that meant to them. I also would ask them what they thought Dom and Master was to them. I was very specific in what I was seeking. Anything not what I was looking for would have been a waste of both of our time.

quote:

ORIGINAL: descrite
Recently, Socks did much the same thing...and he caught a ration of shit for it.

I would ascribe that, mainly, to the inequity of supply and demand in the kink community, vis-a-vis genders.

I don't know of the existence of any male doms who get paid by het chicks. Ditto, realistically, male prostitutes paid by women (as opposed to kept men, which are different creatures). Are there any?

So while a female "sub" might be as direct and detailed as she cares to be, and still get what she wants, the same approach will not work for male subs.

You quoted the wrooooong chick if you want to bring the 'getting paid' stuff into it. Don't even attempt to lower Me into that shit.

I'll be the first person to agree with you that there are different opportunities between the genders for tops. I've never denied that. At the same time, don't confuse My ability with the fact that I have tits to write My own ticket.

See, part of the reason that I can do that is..... Folks come to Me. I can be in bum fuck Egypt, and I'm still a commodity. Care to talk about supply and demand? I'm the only chick this far north that does what I do. Who would have thought that six point Florentine would be such an angle?

Here's a thought, bro..... What if it's not just because I have tits? What if I really AM a top who can hold more than her own? What if I'm just as good as other presenters? What if, I have skills just as good as you?

Now, from here on out, don't you dare tarnish Me with that bullshit and I'll give you the same courtesy in return. You and I will get along just fine if you can show Me courtesy as a fellow top. You figure it out for yourself. I'm not here to teach it to you.

The day you want to talk about brass tacks...... I'll be here.

I wish you well.

quote:

ORIGINAL: littlewonder

I think it's kinda sad that we even need to add "imo" and "personally" to posts just so we can be all politically correct and so that we don't step in doo doo and everyone get all mad and upset.

It should be implied that EVERYTHING we write here is our own opinion.