thexxxxmaster
Posts: 102
Joined: 5/28/2007
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyPact
quote:
ORIGINAL: thexxxxmaster
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyPact
Oddly enough, for someone who wants to chastise others for not being aware of the definition of the word fetish, you've strayed a bit from it. Unlike the current fad of slapping the word fetish on all things related to kink, perhaps you might accept that a number of us here do *not* relate to the actual definition of the word.
Keep in mind, some of us were kinky before it was cool and before what people want to turn it into now.
Oddly enough I am not chastising anyone for not being aware of the definition of the word "Fetish". Quite the reverse. This is the sentence which is in dispute:
Autumnember: "I was only saying that although I don't see myself as a fetishist because i use the real meaning of the word fetish,"
So nothing do with chastising anyone and everything to do with discussing the variety of uses and definitions.
Are you jumping to an illogical conclusion by the use of the word "US"? Or is your use of "current fad" a clue to your thought processing. You would be wrong.
Having a kink and having a Fetish, one and the same or two different concepts. To me they are two different concepts.
Now, let me tell you why I used "fellow Fets".
Fellow begins with "F", and what does kink begin with?
So all about the poet within me and sweet fanny adams to do with Kinkster versus Fetster if there is such a word.
You want to be kinky with a number of fetishes fine, fuck all to do with me, however it has everything to do with me if you and others misinterpret my words and motives and I am very kinky when it comes to pointing discrepancies in reality.
So what do you think I should have used with "fellow", Fuckers?
If it had been Me, personally, I wouldn't have used "fellow" anything. I have no need to feel the call of the heard.
Absolutely! My use of the words "current fad" has quite a bit to do with My thought processing. I was never big on tourists in the leather crowd and I'm not much big on tourists on these sites.
The poet in you wanted to use two words that begin with F? Well, that's just fucking fine. If that's the best you can do at wit, who am I to judge?
The fact that your <cough? poet <cough> is not precise with language, that is your own choice. Yet, you must accept that others will take up your challenge when you attempt to place an incorrect definition of the word.
Wanna bet I just made a better impression on some than you did as a poet? This is a part of why chicks dig Me.
If it had been Me, personally, I wouldn't have used "fellow" anything. I have no need to feel the call of the heard.
Well it wasn't you and that was not my question, or did you HERD it wrong.
Absolutely! My use of the words "current fad" has quite a bit to do with My thought processing. I was never big on tourists in the leather crowd and I'm not much big on tourists on these sites.
My, my, the self inflated ego is now wanting to dictate who uses the site as well. On a par with your use of "us", in denial and ignorance about other people's experience in the lifestyle. Arrogant rubbish
The poet in you wanted to use two words that begin with F? Well, that's just fucking fine. If that's the best you can do at wit, who am I to judge?
Poetry in this context had nothing to do with wit, a friendly greeting, so your judgemental mis-interpretation is way off the accepted usage.
The fact that your <cough? poet <cough> is not precise with language, that is your own choice. Yet, you must accept that others will take up your challenge when you attempt to place an incorrect definition of the word.
Early on in the thread someone challenged my grammar and got it wrong. In the case of your grammar and concept, maybe your cough distracted your mental faculties since you make no sense. My poet does not exist, your imagination running riot again. How anyone can interpret that I am challenging people by saying "Hi, fellow fets" is puerile to say the least. Wah, wah wah, he called me a "fet". Is there even such a word?
Oh, for what it's worth, I don't care about your motives. The fact that you went after that girl in your means to an end does not impress Me. Be nice to her. If you can't, we can talk about why not on the other side.
Whoopee, the knightess in dull fancy dress, widing to the wescue. My conversations with other people are no concern of yours however much they love to receive misplaced validation. If I wish to challenge others on their perceptions then I will and it is hypocritical to say in one sentence that people will challenge me and in the next breathe make that a one way process. I would point out to you that so far all you have done in support of your stance is revel in a stream of personal verbal diarrhoea. However much people like yourself and Autumnumber, on this site may scream otherwise, you all have a fetish of some kind or other when looking at your profile, when applying ALL the definitions and usage recorded by people far more advanced in their knowledge of linguistics than your narrow-minded definition, irrespective what you think. Whine all you want, you will never be right.
Wanna bet I just made a better impression on some than you did as a poet? This is a part of why chicks dig Me.
I have no interest in what others may think, individual dialogues are my interest and I have certainly made an impression on you, which is why I impress people in RL.
I would be surprised if intelligent people would be very impressed by such a domineering motherly attitude. I would suggest you reserved this fetish for your little boys rather than projecting it upon strangers.
|
RE: Seeking the elusive unicorn. - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread