Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Magical thinking


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Magical thinking Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Magical thinking - 10/25/2012 9:46:33 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
quote:


And if I'm not mistaken....Mitt Romney's record as Governor of MA backs up his claim of being able to work better than Obama with Congress....

You're mistaken. State politics are as much like Federal politics as apples to oranges.


Unless it's helpful to link the two by an Administration (and that applies regardless of the Administration in power).

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Magical thinking - 10/25/2012 9:51:01 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59
And I couldn`t give na quarter-shit about "bi-partinsanship".
Working with cons to destroy our economy and country is NOT what most folks call "bi-partisanship".


Especially when they are doing such a fine job on their own! lol


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Magical thinking - 10/25/2012 9:51:50 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59
And I couldn`t give na quarter-shit about "bi-partinsanship".
Working with cons to destroy our economy and country is NOT what most folks call "bi-partisanship".


Especially when they are doing such a fine job on their own! lol



I agree the cons are doing a fine job of destroying this country all on their own. 

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 10/25/2012 9:52:34 AM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Magical thinking - 10/25/2012 9:58:25 AM   
DomYngBlk


Posts: 3316
Joined: 3/27/2006
Status: offline
I think it is clear that Democrats will work with Republicans...ie....Mittens in Mass, Dubya, HW, Reagan..etc etc.....>What isn't clear is that Republicans will work with Democrats. Republicans time and again have shown the inability to govern.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Magical thinking - 10/25/2012 10:00:52 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: Fellow
Pandering to Spanish-speaking voter is not a bad idea though.

That all depends on how you define a "bad idea." I think pandering to any single group is wrong. I abhor it when it's announced that "Candidate X, from the Y Party is going after the Z Vote."

You seem to be saying that candidates should tell all minorities to go fuck themselves. If tht is so how then does one build a consensus?


Actually, what I'm saying is that every Citizen should be treated as an American Citizen regardless of heritage, skin color, gender, gender role, etc.
quote:

quote:

The Presidency is a National position. It's a position over all the genders, ethnicities, races, etc. Pushing or touting any reforms that give one group "special status" over another is wrong.

Why is it wrong to redress inequalities/


It's right to fix inequalities. If you can dole out consequences to those who have perpetrated the inequalities, then prosecute them for it. However, you might not be able to do that. For instance, punishing me for early American slavery would be wrong since my lineage didn't get here until after slavery was abolished.
quote:

quote:

In the eyes of the Government DYB and I should be seen as American Citizens only. We should not be seen as a white guy and a black guy, a Caucasian and an African-American (I only use him because his profile pic shows a black guy, so I assume he's black; I don't have any clue regarding you). We should be treated as equals.

Any casual observer of u.s. history would be aware that that has not historically been the case. Were you unaware of this?


So, since it hasn't been the case, does that mean it shouldn't be?

quote:

quote:

If I donate to the winning candidate's coffers, I should get the same treatment as someone who donated to the losing candidate(s)'s coffer(s).

When has this been the true?


I'm willing to bet that it was true at some point, but would be considered incredibly rare today. But, that doesn't mean it shouldn't be true.

If you want to rely on prior history or "traditional" events to determine best practices today, you've just killed the LBGT movement. You've given illegitimacy to the American Revolution. You've given legitimacy to the early American slave trade. You, then, support Sharia Law where Sharia has been the law.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Magical thinking - 10/25/2012 10:07:45 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Your point of Obama's not enforcing laws is accurate and something should be done about it. It may very well turn out that the laws he's decided to not enforce aren't Constitutional, but that needs to be worked out prior to non-enforcement, IMO.

Which laws are you claiming the President is refusing to enforce?


Obama has refused to defend DOMA in court.

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Magical thinking - 10/25/2012 3:37:08 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

You seem to be saying that candidates should tell all minorities to go fuck themselves. If tht is so how then does one build a consensus?


quote:

Actually, what I'm saying is that every Citizen should be treated as an American Citizen regardless of heritage, skin color, gender, gender role, etc.


I have heard that lame rhetoric all of my life while the reality is just the opposite. For you not to have noticed the disconnect between your rhetoric and what is indicates nothing but willful ignorance on your part.

< Message edited by thompsonx -- 10/25/2012 3:44:16 PM >

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Magical thinking - 10/25/2012 3:41:58 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Why is it wrong to redress inequalities

quote:


It's right to fix inequalities. If you can dole out consequences to those who have perpetrated the inequalities, then prosecute them for it. However, you might not be able to do that. For instance, punishing me for early American slavery would be wrong since my lineage didn't get here until after slavery was abolished.


Since you share the largess of those inequalities why should you not be liable for the sanctions imposed for those inequalities?

< Message edited by thompsonx -- 10/25/2012 3:45:13 PM >

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Magical thinking - 10/25/2012 3:51:56 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

When has this been the true?


quote:

I'm willing to bet that it was true at some point, but would be considered incredibly rare today. But, that doesn't mean it shouldn't be true.


I have asked you to provide us with some instance when your "wishful rhetoric" was true...we are still waiting.

quote:

If you want to rely on prior history or "traditional" events to determine best practices today,

That would be your premis not mine. If you wish it justified then it would be up to you to do so.

quote:

you've just killed the LBGT movement. You've given illegitimacy to the American Revolution. You've given legitimacy to the early American slave trade. You, then, support Sharia Law where Sharia has been the law.


Will rodgers once said "before you are qualified to change my opinion you must first demonstrate that you understand my position."
So far all you are doing is makiing up shit that you think you can argue against. Please try to address the points I make and not the "strawmen" that you wish to argue against.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Magical thinking - 10/25/2012 4:04:12 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
Your point of Obama's not enforcing laws is accurate and something should be done about it. It may very well turn out that the laws he's decided to not enforce aren't Constitutional, but that needs to be worked out prior to non-enforcement, IMO.

Which laws are you claiming the President is refusing to enforce?


Obama has refused to defend DOMA in court.

The law is still being enforced.

The fact is DOMA is unconstitutional, multiple appelate courts have found it violates equal protection. Why should the federal government spend money defending it? How many millions of dollars borrowed from China is it worth?

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Magical thinking - 10/25/2012 4:52:54 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

So I'm reading a little coverage of the President's campaign efforts in Iowa, and I came across the most remarkable quote.

He was talking about the immigration reform he was supposed to get taken care of his first year in office, and is reported to have said, "Republicans will have learned their lesson," and would go along.

It's right in line with his answer in the first debate, that his way to work across the aisle was going to be to say "no."

Sorry, but if the President squeaks through to a victory, the last thing conservatives are going to do is suddenly decide he was right all along. The same electorate that puts him there will also be sending a Republican controlled house to carry the purse, and their mandate will be just as strong as his, if not much stronger.

Unless he figures, "more flexible after the election," also applies to the Constitutional limits on his authority.

Partisan gridlock is only going to get worse in those circumstances. Do you believe a second-term Obama will come up with any answer at all to the problem?


If Obama gets elected (again), the stock market will swoon, horrifically, and the smart people (generally Republicans) will buy all the stock they can afford because by January, thanks to some level of (final) clarity, the market will rise again.

If Romney gets elected, on November 7th, the stock market will rocket to ridiculous levels, fall again but to a higher level than Obama's fall (as described above) and in the end....all will be largely the same.

Note to DYB: It doesn't make a damn bit of difference who gets elected. In the end...it's the same gawdamn shit.

(Pay attention DYB....there's a lesson here).

(They're all the same, regardless of how insistently you demand they are not at all).

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Magical thinking - 10/25/2012 4:54:44 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

It doesn't make a damn bit of difference who gets elected.

Two words: Supreme Court

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to LookieNoNookie)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Magical thinking - 10/25/2012 5:43:50 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

It doesn't make a damn bit of difference who gets elected.

Two words: Supreme Court


I stand corrected....fully and with humble acquiescence.

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Magical thinking - 10/25/2012 5:58:55 PM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
Wont much of that have to depend on the elections to Congress?


That was my take on things as well. That some of the do nothings in congress who recently had single digit popularity are going to be told not to let the door hit them in the ass on the way out.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Magical thinking - 10/25/2012 6:14:29 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk
Republicans time and again have shown the inability to govern.



LOL. I'm loving the desperate disconnect from reality that is happening across the Obamabot spectrum, as they make their final case "arguments." That's even better than the President trying to claim he never sought a SOFA with Iraq, during the last debate.

(in reply to DomYngBlk)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Magical thinking - 10/25/2012 6:47:20 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
I thought he was looking for a chaise
Badoom BAh
as I thought crappy humour was in line with the "romneybots" comments over the last few days

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Magical thinking - 10/25/2012 7:00:39 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
Except, "Obamabots," was popularized (sort-of) by an actual liberal who didn't chuck all his values out the window, once a Democrat was in office. The little plays on Romney's name are just the inventions of opposition hacks, trying to do something, anything, to minimize the fact that the American people have now seen Romney without the filter of the negative advertising blitz, and decided that he's well worth a look as an acceptable alternative to this failed administration.


(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Magical thinking - 10/25/2012 7:14:05 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
you keep telling yourself that...you mean obamabots is the worst thing people have changed his name to??? nah I dont believe that for one second.
Personally I was commenting on YOUR use of the word Obamabots:) but it is better than "desperate democrat whores"
so yanno, Ill take what I can get, seeing as its YOU

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Magical thinking - 10/25/2012 7:18:22 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline
Ok. That, I might very well have said, Lucy.


(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Magical thinking - 10/25/2012 7:20:23 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
AHUH
edited to add, I made sure of it, before saying it..I do NOT want a repeat of the other day

< Message edited by Lucylastic -- 10/25/2012 7:21:46 PM >


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Magical thinking Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094