Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi - 10/27/2012 1:21:56 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline 		Cmon Servant, I got one of the links from one of your FAVOURITE sites.....
Where is all the links and sources to refute them??? you've been asked more than once. with how many posts on the subject?????,m you never gave any.... you are doing the wolf crying maybe?

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi - 10/27/2012 1:53:26 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

I agree.

Oh, I've seen "explanations", but I'd like more proof before I jump onto the bandwagon.

It was either normal bureaucratic screwup, or it was intentional.

If it was a screwup, then fine ... but why the WH kept up the untrue story for two weeks in a compounding of a "normal bureaucratic snafu" is beyond me. It would have been a doubling, or triple-downing on a bad situation. If true, this doesn't reflect well on the WH.

If it was intentional ... then, well, damn. I hope the floodgates of hell open up on the Administration, because they would deserve it.

Either way, I see no positive side for Obama. Do you?

Firm


How many more times does this need saying. Obama said it was a terrorist attack the very next day, in a speech from the Rose Garden.

Its easy enough to find but facts dont actually fit the bullshit floating about on here, so I guess it gets ignored.

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi - 10/27/2012 5:12:02 PM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline 		Obama never said that this was a terrorist attack. This is what he said. " No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation"...Then the lies / coverup started, blaming the video and a mob who supposedly saw it. 

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi - 10/27/2012 5:13:47 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

Obama never said that this was a terrorist attack. This is what he said. " No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation"...Then the lies / coverup started, blaming the video and a mob who supposedly saw it. 



WTF do you think an act of terror is, and who do you think carries them out ?


(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi - 10/27/2012 5:25:06 PM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline 		Maybe Obama should answer your question. Instead of calling the attack what it was, he gave his usual line of BS. I guess he didn't want to admit that his foreign policy over the last 4 years is a total failure.

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi - 10/27/2012 5:27:33 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

Maybe Obama should answer your question. Instead of calling the attack what it was, he gave his usual line of BS. I guess he didn't want to admit that his foreign policy over the last 4 years is a total failure.



Why should he answer, you claimed he lied. Are you saying he meant something other than terrorists when talking about terror attacks ?


(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi - 10/27/2012 5:30:44 PM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline 		Yes, that's what I am saying. If he  were telling the truth, he, Hillary and Susan Rice wouldn't have been out there blamimg a stupid video for nearly 14 days.

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi - 10/27/2012 6:44:41 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

I agree.

Oh, I've seen "explanations", but I'd like more proof before I jump onto the bandwagon.

It was either normal bureaucratic screwup, or it was intentional.

If it was a screwup, then fine ... but why the WH kept up the untrue story for two weeks in a compounding of a "normal bureaucratic snafu" is beyond me. It would have been a doubling, or triple-downing on a bad situation. If true, this doesn't reflect well on the WH.

If it was intentional ... then, well, damn. I hope the floodgates of hell open up on the Administration, because they would deserve it.

Either way, I see no positive side for Obama. Do you?


How many more times does this need saying. Obama said it was a terrorist attack the very next day, in a speech from the Rose Garden.

Its easy enough to find but facts dont actually fit the bullshit floating about on here, so I guess it gets ignored.


Polite,

We can argue whether or not he actually called it a terrorist attack in the Rose Garden speech. To me, it appeared that he wasn't directly referring to that specific incident, but even if I grant you are correct, his later speeches were pretty specific as the cause being the video. As well, he sent Susan Rice on the Sunday talk shows (all of them) to give an Administration line that it was a spontaneous demostration that just 'accidently" turned into an attack, and caused by the outrage of over the video.

If he knew it was a full blown, dedicated terrorist attack on the second day, why did he and his minions then proceed to say otherwise for almost two more weeks?

Back to my original post above: it was either the mother-of-all bureaucratic snafus that exposed some real incompetence of political leadership, or it was intentional.

Can you give me another possible scenario?

Firm

_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi - 10/27/2012 7:11:02 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

How many more times does this need saying. Obama said it was a terrorist attack the very next day, in a speech from the Rose Garden.

Its easy enough to find but facts dont actually fit the bullshit floating about on here, so I guess it gets ignored.

Here is a pretty complete timeline, and chain of events, on Yahoo News from FactCheck.org:

Benghazi Timeline
FactCheck.org – Fri, Oct 26, 2012

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi - 10/28/2012 4:28:03 AM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline 		I would go for cock up rather than cover up Firm. The follwoing link explains it quite well.

http://theweek.com/article/index/235119/new-benghazi-revelations-should-republicans-lay-off-susan-rice

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi - 10/28/2012 4:42:34 AM   
subspaceseven


Posts: 467
Joined: 3/2/2012
Status: offline 		Of course if we are looking for a President who lied to everyone, here is a good timeline

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/3889303.stm


Does everyone remember these dates?????



2 May, 2003
George Bush declares victory in war on Iraq.

4 May, 2003
George Bush says it is only a matter of time before US troops find banned weapons hidden in Iraq.

3/13/02 Bush on Osama: "I'll repeat what I said. I truly am not that concerned about him."




http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2011/12/leadup-iraq-war-timeline


On vacation in Crawford, Bush receives a Presidential Daily Briefing warning, "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US." FBI highlights Al Qaeda activities consistent with hijacking preparations, as well as surveillance of federal buildings. [Date the public knew: 5/18/02]

CIA officer flies to Crawford to call Bush's attention to document. Bush replies, "All right, you've covered your ass now."

And lets not forget, at this moment Willard has 3/4 of Bushes team giving him advice on how to handle the middle east...

http://www.policymic.com/articles/11219/mitt-romney-foreign-policy-team-17-of-24-advisors-are-bush-neocons

< Message edited by subspaceseven -- 10/28/2012 5:02:39 AM >

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi - 10/28/2012 5:22:02 AM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline 		You can't talk agout Benbhazi without going back 10 years to talk about Bush.

(in reply to subspaceseven)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi - 10/28/2012 5:31:49 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline 		If you dont see the comparisons in stark daylight
keep yourself covered up in that warm BS and grow to your full potential mr funguy

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi - 10/28/2012 7:39:14 AM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline 		I though I was "mr.funguy"

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi - 10/28/2012 7:56:15 AM   
subspaceseven


Posts: 467
Joined: 3/2/2012
Status: offline 		Just comparing the alleged lies of the thread title with the proven lies of the last administration.

By your ideals, in tens years will the GOP and it's followers not be able to bring up Obama when defending the lies of who ever they support????

(in reply to subspaceseven)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi - 10/28/2012 8:21:15 AM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline
None of the Republican posters on this board can effectively go here and acknowledge this information. It amazing how they see only what they want to.

(in reply to subspaceseven)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi - 10/28/2012 11:38:44 AM   
servantforuse


Posts: 6363
Joined: 3/8/2006
Status: offline 		This thread was about Obama and Benghazi, not Bush 10 years ago. Try to stay on topic..

(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi - 10/28/2012 11:51:31 AM   
Yachtie


Posts: 3593
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

This thread was about Obama and Benghazi, not Bush 10 years ago. Try to stay on topic..



They'll be back on topic when Mittens is elected.

_____________________________

“We all know it’s going to end badly, but in the meantime we can make some money.” - Jim Cramer, CNBC

“Those who ‘abjure’ violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf.” - George Orwell

(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi - 10/28/2012 11:52:56 AM   
subspaceseven


Posts: 467
Joined: 3/2/2012
Status: offline 		It's a response to the GOP being so simple minded as to want to blame Obama, while even members of the GOP such as Condi Rice are asking people to wait until the all the information is complied,

where was such a large quest for the truth when they allowed Bush to lie for years and years despite evidence he and Cheney lied to the people of this country...

Compare the time lines...or does the truth about one of the worst President we ever had to much for you to handle

Hell willard can't even get the time line correct, still insisting it took two weeks for Obama to call it an act of terror, though this has been disproved, perhaps if you turn off Fox and Beck you may find a little truth

(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi - 10/28/2012 11:53:29 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

Yes, that's what I am saying. If he  were telling the truth, he, Hillary and Susan Rice wouldn't have been out there blamimg a stupid video for nearly 14 days.


Ah yes, only Obama should tell the truth.... Only Obama.

There, now I tied the other posts nicely into your thread.

They are referring to your hypocrisy.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to servantforuse)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Dear Leader's Pack of Lies on Benghazi Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094