Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Rethinking the rules of war


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Rethinking the rules of war Page: <<   < prev  7 8 9 [10] 11   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Rethinking the rules of war - 11/27/2012 4:02:21 AM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
Tweakable, ominously Israel have threatened to oust the leader of the PA if the UN votes in favour of a Palestinian State.

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 181
RE: Rethinking the rules of war - 11/27/2012 4:44:31 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Tweakable, ominously Israel have threatened to oust the leader of the PA if the UN votes in favour of a Palestinian State.


That would be another myopic decision by Israeli leaders who have done the cause of Israel a disservice over the decades and why world opinion is steadily moving behind a Palestinian state. Israelis might say so what, their defence is everything, not world opinion but they forget, the USA might not always be able to fund and guarantee Israel's survival. Only peace and recognition by its neighbours can do that in the long term. Brute force is only a short term option. Israel would be better with a statesman as their leader, not a hyena.

Palestinians are ill served with their leaders too but that is another story or is it?

_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 182
RE: Rethinking the rules of war - 11/27/2012 4:49:28 AM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
I think both sides have been ill served by their leaders. Palestinians and Israelis all deserve better.

Januarys election in Israel will be quite telling.

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 183
RE: Rethinking the rules of war - 11/27/2012 4:56:21 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
As far as Palestinian leaders go, Israel's preference for negotiating with PLJ or Abu Nidal rather than Hamas does seem to be a deliberate attempt to undermine the one home rule oriented group who have something resembling a mandate and could maybe keep a lid on the problem if recognised internationally.
One could almost think that Israel doesn't want a Palestinian government that the UN might recognise...

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 184
RE: Rethinking the rules of war - 11/27/2012 5:01:21 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

As far as Palestinian leaders go, Israel's preference for negotiating with PLJ or Abu Nidal rather than Hamas does seem to be a deliberate attempt to undermine the one home rule oriented group who have something resembling a mandate and could maybe keep a lid on the problem if recognised internationally.
One could almost think that Israel doesn't want a Palestinian government that the UN might recognise...


Israel's rejection of Fatah led to Hamas, will its rejection of Hamas result in worse? Who knows but with Arab dictators being overthrown and street level support for the Palestinians no longer being suppressed by brutal dictators, worse could result.

_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 185
RE: Rethinking the rules of war - 11/27/2012 5:18:23 AM   
Moonhead


Posts: 16520
Joined: 9/21/2009
Status: offline
I've no idea if rejecting Hamas will lead to worse, but that's obviously what the Israeli government is hoping for, isn't it?

_____________________________

I like to think he was eaten by rats, in the dark, during a fog. It's what he would have wanted...
(Simon R Green on the late James Herbert)

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 186
RE: Rethinking the rules of war - 11/27/2012 5:29:42 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
Isn't the really odd thing that Israel has some how taken it upon itself to decide who the legitimate representatives of the Palestinian people are?

The bottom line is that it isn't up to Israel to decide, no more than it is up to the Palestinians to nominate who the representatives of the Israeli side will be in any negotiations. Not that this has inhibited Israel in the past .......

And as for Israel dumping the PA ... they'd be quite stupid to do this - they're never going to get a more compliant Palestinian leader than Abbas. Not that this has inhibited Israel in the past either .......

_____________________________



(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 187
RE: Rethinking the rules of war - 11/27/2012 6:13:26 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

Isn't the really odd thing that Israel has some how taken it upon itself to decide who the legitimate representatives of the Palestinian people are?



Isn't that the problem of the west in general? The west claims to believe in democracy but only if its the west's version of pliant democracy in the heads of none westerners. You can have any democracy you like as long as it is western consumerist capitalist democracy, any other democracy will not be tolerated.

< Message edited by meatcleaver -- 11/27/2012 6:15:44 AM >


_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 188
RE: Rethinking the rules of war - 11/27/2012 6:17:24 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

Isn't the really odd thing that Israel has some how taken it upon itself to decide who the legitimate representatives of the Palestinian people are?



Isn't that the problem of the west in general? The west claims to believe in democracy but only if its the west's version of pliant democracy in the heads of none westerners.


Indeedies. And there's no better illustration of this than the collective punishment dished out to the people of Gaza for daring to elect a Govt that the West didn't think was suitable for them.


_____________________________



(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 189
RE: Rethinking the rules of war - 11/27/2012 10:32:21 AM   
Edwynn


Posts: 4105
Joined: 10/26/2008
Status: offline

But that is merely your assertion that a locally democratically elected or otherwise non-Israeli or non-Western designated PM or premier or chancellor would have made today's situation better, as it was pointed out to me earlier in the discussion that it was merely my assertion that a democratically elected Mosaddegh being in place until Iranians decided elsewise at some later time would have resulted in a better Iran and Iranian situation today than what has otherwise been obtained by the Western-installed Pahlavi, with subsequent and current mayhem.

No conjecture concerning the situation that would contemplate absence of decades-long Western intervention is to be allowed, don't you know.




< Message edited by Edwynn -- 11/27/2012 10:38:46 AM >

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 190
RE: Rethinking the rules of war - 11/27/2012 11:49:03 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
Meatcleaver:
quote:

The Levant which we are now discussing saw large numbers of locals converting to Islam in the wake of the muslim expansion. I could go on and on. We come to a point of who is a Jew and who isn't and genetically, that is one of perception, you accentuate the similarities or you accentuate the differences, ultimately the choice is cultural.

Okay. You present an intriguing point. It is reasonable and somewhat entertaining to assume that modern day Palestinians are off-shoots of the Jews who did not leave after the destruction of the Temple. However, if not genetically far distant the Zionists are politically worlds apart from the Palestinians. The European Jews were a Nation without land while the Palestinains are a land without a Nation.

Zionism from the start was a reaction against assimilation into European cultures and citizenship. The question of who is or what is a Jew was a European question before it became a question in the Levant. Assimilation of Jews into European Christian nations was troubled to say the least and reached horrific consequences in 20th C Germany. I can't speak for the Zionist mindset from experience but I can conjecture that there is no room beyond tokenism in Jewish Israel for Palestinians whatever their genetic or cultural connections.

Zionism is a reactionary political movement whose goal, I imagine, is one nation from the Jordan to the Sea. The Settlement movement is probably beyond reversal, as Tweak has mentioned in another thread. The two state solution is probably a stall while the indigenous people are being corralled onto reservations much as they were in 19th C America. I would not hold out hope for anything other than the Jacksonian solution. I cannot imagine what pressures could be brought upon Israel to change her presumed "manifest destiny."

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 191
RE: Rethinking the rules of war - 11/27/2012 2:30:00 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Meatcleaver:
quote:

The Levant which we are now discussing saw large numbers of locals converting to Islam in the wake of the muslim expansion. I could go on and on. We come to a point of who is a Jew and who isn't and genetically, that is one of perception, you accentuate the similarities or you accentuate the differences, ultimately the choice is cultural.

Okay. You present an intriguing point. It is reasonable and somewhat entertaining to assume that modern day Palestinians are off-shoots of the Jews who did not leave after the destruction of the Temple. However, if not genetically far distant the Zionists are politically worlds apart from the Palestinians. The European Jews were a Nation without land while the Palestinains are a land without a Nation.

Zionism from the start was a reaction against assimilation into European cultures and citizenship. The question of who is or what is a Jew was a European question before it became a question in the Levant. Assimilation of Jews into European Christian nations was troubled to say the least and reached horrific consequences in 20th C Germany. I can't speak for the Zionist mindset from experience but I can conjecture that there is no room beyond tokenism in Jewish Israel for Palestinians whatever their genetic or cultural connections.

Zionism is a reactionary political movement whose goal, I imagine, is one nation from the Jordan to the Sea. The Settlement movement is probably beyond reversal, as Tweak has mentioned in another thread. The two state solution is probably a stall while the indigenous people are being corralled onto reservations much as they were in 19th C America. I would not hold out hope for anything other than the Jacksonian solution. I cannot imagine what pressures could be brought upon Israel to change her presumed "manifest destiny."

In an interview on 60 minutes with mike wallace the "dood" from iran with the beard and really long name sugested that since it was the germans who butt phoqued the jews that it was a german problem and that a jewish state ought to be carved out of germany and not out of arab land.

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 192
RE: Rethinking the rules of war - 11/27/2012 2:41:53 PM   
Edwynn


Posts: 4105
Joined: 10/26/2008
Status: offline

That's cute, in a way, but his particular conception of the problem in fact does show his unawareness of the history of his own region prior to WWII, the Balfour Declaration, etc.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 193
RE: Rethinking the rules of war - 11/27/2012 2:48:41 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn


That's cute, in a way, but his particular conception of the problem in fact does show his unawareness of the history of his own region prior to WWII, the Balfour Declaration, etc.

Perhaps you might avail yourself of the interview and judge for yourself his "ignorance" of the history of that part of the world.
The interview was somewhat more involved than the snippit to which I alluded.

(in reply to Edwynn)
Profile   Post #: 194
RE: Rethinking the rules of war - 11/27/2012 6:32:31 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Was that the fourth or fifth time we had to retake Fallujah?
You seem to forget that the man in charge at My Lai is still in prison.
If he had been South Korean ( they fought there) he would have gotten a commendation, if not a promotion.



A classic knee jerk response which overlooks anything said in the post replied to.

Added that your "facts cough cough" are bullshit. the saddest part is your crassness in suggesting that a man ordering civillians to be herded into a ditch and shot would have got a medal if he had been South Korean.

To sum up..... WTF.

My Lai nwas sop for RoK forces. As you should know.

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 195
RE: Rethinking the rules of war - 11/27/2012 6:36:39 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: SilverMark

General Sherman once said “This war differs from other wars, in this particular. We are not fighting armies but a hostile people, and must make old and young, rich and poor, feel the hard hand of war.”...Had he not done so, the South may have resisted further and longer than they did. The point being, that war should be horrible, so that we seek ways to end it. Collateral damage and death of civilians bring home the facts that it must end, and brings the parties to the table, if they are civilized enough to do so.
Great post tweak...

Sherman was a fucking moron with little military talent, making war on women and children is always easier than fighting soldiers with guns.
The people of savanah managed to snooker him and nathan bedford forrest scared the living shit out of him. But then forrest scared the living shit out of most of his enemies.


No Sherman was one if not the best commander the north had, study his campaign against Johnson in Tenn. He is known for the march through Ga but that is not representative of his ability.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 196
RE: Rethinking the rules of war - 11/27/2012 6:42:12 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Calley was under house arrest for a couple years, and the Army (who really didn't want to prosecute him anyway) let him walk after the newspaper headlines had died down.



I stand corrected on this point I remembered that he had been given life but did not know he had been released.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 197
RE: Rethinking the rules of war - 11/28/2012 12:35:22 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
Okay. You present an intriguing point. It is reasonable and somewhat entertaining to assume that modern day Palestinians are off-shoots of the Jews who did not leave after the destruction of the Temple. However, if not genetically far distant the Zionists are politically worlds apart from the Palestinians. The European Jews were a Nation without land while the Palestinains are a land without a Nation.


You mean a nation without a state?


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Zionism from the start was a reaction against assimilation into European cultures and citizenship. The question of who is or what is a Jew was a European question before it became a question in the Levant. Assimilation of Jews into European Christian nations was troubled to say the least and reached horrific consequences in 20th C Germany. I can't speak for the Zionist mindset from experience but I can conjecture that there is no room beyond tokenism in Jewish Israel for Palestinians whatever their genetic or cultural connections.



I accept anti-semiticism is an ingrained attitude which is religious and economic in origin, caused through the powers that be in Europe.

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
Zionism is a reactionary political movement whose goal, I imagine, is one nation from the Jordan to the Sea. The Settlement movement is probably beyond reversal, as Tweak has mentioned in another thread. The two state solution is probably a stall while the indigenous people are being corralled onto reservations much as they were in 19th C America. I would not hold out hope for anything other than the Jacksonian solution. I cannot imagine what pressures could be brought upon Israel to change her presumed "manifest destiny."


Fortunately for American ´manifest destiny´many indians died of European introduced deseases and-or were happily slaughtered and starved with no international community to worry about.

The dilemma for Israel is that it has a population time bomb on its hands. The Palestinian population is growing faster than the Jewish population. In Israel proper and the occupied territories together, Jews are 50% of the population, Palestinians 46% of the problem. There are no deseases wiping out Palestinians, they cannot be starved or murdered in numbers that can change the situation and there is an international community watching. Sooner or later Israel will be forced into a decision by circumstance, to assimilate the Palestinians into a greater Israel which would mean the end of a Jewish state or acquiesque on the two state solution.

Oh and an interesting point. Because of the population time bomb, the Israeli state hasn´t been paying too much attention as to whether immigrants are Jews or not. It is claimed many Russian Jewish immigrants weren´t Jewish at all but Russians seeking a better life, which is somewhat backed up by the fact some admitted the fact and have gone back to Russia now life has improved there.

< Message edited by meatcleaver -- 11/28/2012 12:42:31 AM >


_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 198
RE: Rethinking the rules of war - 11/28/2012 5:52:26 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn
No conjecture concerning the situation that would contemplate absence of decades-long Western intervention is to be allowed, don't you know.


The problem with conjecture that contemplates what the ME would be like without Western intervention, is that it would be nothing more than conjecture and not provable. Personally, I'd like to see what the ME would be like without Western intervention, starting... now. Wait. No. Can't start yet. Have to make sure Israel doesn't start a war or anything. Maybe we could be more akin to babysitters, letting the Nations self-determine, but prevent/stop them from harming one another.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Edwynn)
Profile   Post #: 199
RE: Rethinking the rules of war - 11/28/2012 6:12:01 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: SilverMark

General Sherman once said “This war differs from other wars, in this particular. We are not fighting armies but a hostile people, and must make old and young, rich and poor, feel the hard hand of war.”...Had he not done so, the South may have resisted further and longer than they did. The point being, that war should be horrible, so that we seek ways to end it. Collateral damage and death of civilians bring home the facts that it must end, and brings the parties to the table, if they are civilized enough to do so.
Great post tweak...

Sherman was a fucking moron with little military talent, making war on women and children is always easier than fighting soldiers with guns.
The people of savanah managed to snooker him and nathan bedford forrest scared the living shit out of him. But then forrest scared the living shit out of most of his enemies.


No Sherman was one if not the best commander the north had, study his campaign against Johnson in Tenn. He is known for the march through Ga but that is not representative of his ability.

I have read all about the little punk ass motherfucker...he was emenently successful against women and children but only marginally effective against inferior forces. of armed men...perhaps you should read more about his thoughts on forrest and his ineffective efforts to stop him.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 200
Page:   <<   < prev  7 8 9 [10] 11   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Rethinking the rules of war Page: <<   < prev  7 8 9 [10] 11   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.086