AthenaSurrenders
Posts: 3582
Joined: 3/15/2012 Status: offline
|
I see a lot of people saying they hope to be collared, or that their Master/Mistress/other D-type is considering collaring them, or talking about 'since I was collared'. I dislike the passivity of the term. What I infer from that is that the dominant was the one doing the choosing, they selected the submissive and took possession. It sounds like the dominant partner was the one who made the decision to become D/s or M/s. Now there's nothing wrong with that, but I can't relate to it. In our relationship all decisions up to and including the decision to go M/s were taken jointly and on equal footing. It was only after that decision that he got the final say. I don't say that he collared me, because I feel it was something 'we' did, rather than something one person did to the other. I know for some people, being selected by the dominant, and perhaps having to go through periods of 'consideration' or 'training' to earn the right to be owned are very meaningful and exciting concepts. I never felt that way - it feels a bit like holding the dominant up on a pedestal just for identifying as dominant. I certainly always felt that I was just as worthy a partner and had plenty to offer - had I ever felt like he expected me to prove myself in a one-sided way, I'd have walked away. The only proving that was done was the normal getting to know each other and demonstrating that we were decent human beings, as happens in any vanilla relationship. So - what do you think? Do you use the term? Do you agree with me on what I think it implies, and is that a good or a bad thing? Or am I totally overthinking a term that is just a convenient way of expressing a level of commitment? For the record - I'm not criticising the practice of using a collar as a sign of ownership, just pondering the semantics of the term.
_____________________________
Being your slave, what should I do but tend Upon the hours and times of your desire?
|