RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


ChatteParfaitt -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/16/2012 11:55:32 AM)

On a complete twist from my latest post, I did want to respond to Aylee's need to see this type of killer tortured before death.

I have to ask her: Who would you choose to do that? Would *you* volunteer to be the one to crack the ribs and pull the lungs out and toss the salt on the wounds? If so, what do you think it says about YOU, as a person. Do you think performing these acts, no matter how much deserved, would change you as a person?

Please note that I get revenge. I am with Kana, if a ten year old spree kills, then kill him. And part of my saying this is a need not just to protect society, but for revenge. But if you proscribe torturing first, how do you think this would alter the people doing the torturing?

How would it alter our society?




Aswad -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/16/2012 11:56:08 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt

I think most would agree that all though mass murderers have always been with us, our society is breeding spree and serial killers, and we need a better understanding of why that is.


And it might not be a bad idea to understand why they don't pop up nearly as often where I live.

quote:

The thing is, rehabilitation does not work for criminals because they have never been habilitated.


Come visit. Have a look at our rehabilitation. It works. They come out better people than they were going in.

quote:

That said, even in a Utopian society, a certain percentage of people would choose to be criminal.


Hell, yes. In a utopian society, I probably would be.

quote:

At this point, I don't see humans as being able to alter this type of criminals' psychological makeup in the least.


I wouldn't know about spree killers and serial killers. As I said, we aren't really in the business of making those.

quote:

My recommendation remains the same, study those they allow it, then kill them.


Premeditated killing by a state of its citizens always struck me as a form of secular molochism that is unhealthy.

quote:

I have very strong objections to allowing them to breed.


We should be careful about weeding out traits, since we have no idea if they may be useful later.

That said, the US can probably stand to trim the trees a bit. [:D]

IWYW,
— Aswad.




vincentML -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/16/2012 11:57:09 AM)

Excellent discourse, CP.
Do you think spree killers should be punished as harshly as serial killers?




Aswad -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/16/2012 11:58:43 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

A great deal of planning by the perpetrator goes into these events, which suggests that snapping is not an issue.


I disagree. The profile says this guy was pretty smart. Speaking from experience, my idea of acting rashly is a lot more convoluted than just randomly lashing out.

quote:

The spree killers as opposed to the serial killers seem to be self-destructive.


Makes perfect sense. That's where the snapping is: deciding you no longer care.

McVeigh committed suicide by law, essentially.

quote:

Which raises the issue of why they feel the need to share their suicide.


Same reason that caused the snap in the first place.

quote:

But European nations, looking back through the Thirty Years War and all that followed, and looking ahead to possible disunion, have not acquitted themselves so humanely either.


Never said Europe is a healthy place. Just said it's healthier at the moment.

quote:

Hopefully, your experiments with social democracy will prove more beneficial than our stuttering efforts.


Actually, I'm hoping we'll throw in the towel on social democracy, and bring the lessons learned forward into something else.

Unfortunately, that's unlikely to happen, for the simple reason that social democracy is "good enough".

IWYW,
— Aswad.




ChatteParfaitt -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/16/2012 11:59:14 AM)

Yes, because both types kill without remorse, and will kill again if given an opportunity.

There are a rare few willing to help others understand them. All should be studied, for a time. You know, Bundy was willing to talk to just about anybody, but he wasn't trying to help others understand him, he was a master manipulator who loved an audience. Still, we learned a great deal from talking to him in prison.

But in the end, both types should be 'put down' - JMO. The serial killer is 'programmed' to kill, the spree killer a ticking murderous time bomb.




Aswad -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/16/2012 12:00:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Breivik did not go into a school. He attacked the youth camp of a political party which he held responsible for the Muslim immigration, as I understand it.


This is so far from a meaningful understanding that it's kind of frightening, even if you're not in Europe.

I should write something about it if/when this place returns to being a place to invest time in.

I've analyzed that case to hell and back, long before it happened.

IWYW,
— Aswad.




Aswad -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/16/2012 12:01:35 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

The condition is known as a psychotic break.


That was my initial assumption. It seems plausible.

quote:

Usually brought on by some extremely traumatic event in a person's life.


Which is why I'm curious as to whether he really killed his own mother, or whether she committed suicide or was killed by someone else, and whether there was anything going on between her and the school up front; we know he got into it with some of the people at the school, but not what that was.

quote:

A person suffering from this will strike out at those people or institutions that to them, represent the reason of the loss or they are so overwhelmed they want others to feel as much emotional pain or more than they are feeling.


Often, but not always. It depends on the nature of the event that overwhelmed their good sense, and the context.

quote:

In essence they are truly suffering a period of temporary insanity. The difference in this type of individual, they rarely snap back to reality or sanity without long term, intensive therapy in an institution.


Actually, most brief reactive psychoses are indeed brief, and will in most people normalize without treatment (but treatment may hasten the recovery).

It can happen to otherwise mentally healthy people, too, incidentally.

IWYW,
— Aswad.




Aswad -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/16/2012 12:04:16 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: littlewonder

He planned it. He was wearing a bulletproof jacket. He didn't just snap and then said, "Oh wait, I should grab my bulletproof jacket".


Actually, that sounds like something I would remember, even when completely out of it.

Psychosis reduces your mental coherence, it doesn't make you retarded.

If this guy was smart, he'd prolly be smart during a BRP, too.

IWYW,
— Aswad.




GotSteel -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/16/2012 12:14:14 PM)

My answer to the question Punishment, Retribution or Rehabilitation is that if we're planning on letting someone out of jail, regardless of whatever else we want to do to them, we absolutely need to rehabilitate them.

That said I'm not a fan of giving spree killers a mulligan regardless of what mitigating excuses they have, the whole risk to benefit thing just doesn't seem sound to me.




PowerXXXchange -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/17/2012 2:16:34 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt


Although I agree with Kana that these types of killers should be 'put down' I strongly believe that should be done only after a period of study. Because the biggest issue with these types of murderers is understanding why they do what they do.

Without that understanding, we can't catch them, and we sure as hell can't stop them.

I think most would agree that all though mass murderers have always been with us, our society is breeding spree and serial killers, and we need a better understanding of why that is.

It's not just a breakdown of our mental health system, though that is a component. Its not just an issue of gun control, although that does tend to factor in with spree killers.






There is so much we don't know... what is it that we know pretty much for sure?

In terms of cause, we know that serial or mass killers have one major factor in common - they are almost entirely males. This is a story that will not be fully explained biologically without involving that simple molecule, testosterone, and its relation to brain development, especially the development of centers related to empathy.

There is no answer to the nature-nurture question, as the question presupposes a dichotomy; the more that we study serial or mass killers, or the easier subject of the various behaviors that make up Autism Spectrum Disorder, the more the balance between biological and social/family/experience influences is revealed. And while the new tools of MRI brain scanning, DNA scanning and genetics, and sensitive biochemistry will give us clues to the biological factors, the effects of parenting and social relationships will likely remain relatively unquantified and elusive. Environmental factors lack similar quantitative tools and for obvious ethical reasons must depend on case studies, statistical analysis and animal experimentation.

They are all males, lacking empathy as a mental defect and we do not know why. Professor Simon Baron Cohen says it better than I...

here

So we have as a society about 1 in 100 beautiful male babies who will develop some level of ASD, and who show signs of it at birth.

Yet, as an older relative of two young boys, both with enough ASD behaviours to keep them from attending the preschool of their parents’ choice, as well a long time close friend with an Asperger’s child living on the streets, I am personally amazed at the power of environmental factors to moderate their dysfunctional behaviors forbetter or worse.

The problem I see is that our wildly ahistorical culture is often toxic to children. Farm families of the last century had utilitarian places for moody and introverted children. Both parents were typically present and extended family was also there to relieve or augment poor parenting. There was a vocational future: animals needed tending and didn't require a finely tuned empathy (check out the relationship between ASD and pet ownership) Life was much more solitary.

How long will it take to sort out causes? And how long thereafter for that knowledge to be politically digested and the values of freedom weighed against a more wholesome culture?

I am sad that over the near future this will not be the last mass killing that we will see, or the largest. It is the fourth that Obama has flown to in his first term, so a rough estimate is one a year of national magnitude... ugh.

In the meantime, maybe it's time to play a video game and bake Christmas cookies with an introverted child. That's one other thing we know to do, it helps, and it’s fun too.

PxC




meatcleaver -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/17/2012 3:23:06 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


This is a spinoff from the mental health thread regarding mass killers. Adam Lanza is dead, but suppose he were not, as James Holmes, the Aurora theatre killer is not. I am presuming Lanza was severely mentally depressed, as indications suggest Holmes was.



Don't most mass killers kill themselves or are eventually killed as they appear to expect and want? In that regard, isn't debate on punishment pretty academic?

Though I would question whether mass killers are mentally depressed or are suffering any mental illness that we aren't all suffering from ie. the human condition. The knowledge that life is ultimately futile and pointless and we all die regardless of what we do in life. We will all suffer the same fate ie. ultimately we are nothing, our lives will be extiguished and nothing, zilch, the universe has ceased to be because we have ceased to be.




ChatteParfaitt -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/17/2012 3:44:10 AM)

Actually, not all serial killers are male. There are female serial killers who generally fall into one of three categories: angel of death types (think nurse who kills her patients), black widow types (think wife who kills numerous husbands for gain), and then those who are partnered with a male serial killer. Some, like Aileen Wournes, have their own category.

There have been plenty of female serial killers, but they kill for different reasons.




Aswad -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/17/2012 4:02:38 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PowerXXXchange

In terms of cause, we know that serial or mass killers have one major factor in common - they are almost entirely males.


Even male serial killers are almost absent in some cultures, and almost common in others.

As CP points out, female serial killers are more common than we like to think.

It's a myth that violence and death is solely the province of men.

Hell, it's not even close, going by more recent research.

The rest didn't seem worth responding to.

IWYW,
— Aswad.

P.S.: ChatteParfaitt, I wouldn't call Homolka paired to a man per se, seeing as she's been paired to more than one man. Looks more like she got off the hook thanks to the common perception that women can't be serial killers. Women have a different risk tolerance, and as you say often have different motives, two factors that may well be enough to account for the differences.




ChatteParfaitt -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/17/2012 4:25:17 AM)

quote:

Don't most mass killers kill themselves or are eventually killed as they appear to expect and want? In that regard, isn't debate on punishment pretty academic?


Most do kill themselves or opt for suicide by cop, but not all. One result of the increase in this type of crime is that hostage negotiators are more successful, and swat teams have learned better apprehension methods. (I'm sure our advancing technology has played a part in this as well.)

Of course, not everyone sees apprehension of the spree killer as a plus.









mons -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/17/2012 4:27:54 AM)

I am so, ...............I can not find the word!!! I worked at an elementary school for twenty years!

I can not begin to tell anyone how this has made me feel such pain!

mons




vincentML -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/17/2012 4:41:54 AM)


ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

quote:

Don't most mass killers kill themselves or are eventually killed as they appear to expect and want? In that regard, isn't debate on punishment pretty academic?

Yes, mostly. There is the exception: the Aurora batman killer James Holmes is caught and awaiting trial. Breivik is in jail in Norway.Serial killers OTH are not suicidal. I raise two issues: 1. is it moral for a society to kill killers? 2. Can we learn from them to develop preventative strategies?

quote:

Though I would question whether mass killers are mentally depressed or are suffering any mental illness that we aren't all suffering from ie. the human condition. The knowledge that life is ultimately futile and pointless and we all die regardless of what we do in life. We will all suffer the same fate ie. ultimately we are nothing, our lives will be extiguished and nothing, zilch, the universe has ceased to be because we have ceased to be.


Not everyone shares your seemingly extreme nihilism. Many, perhaps including you, believe we can construct our own meaningfulness for the short time we are here. Andrea Yates and James Holmes displayed and were diagnosed with serious mental illness/depression.




Politesub53 -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/17/2012 4:58:08 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Excellent discourse, CP.
Do you think spree killers should be punished as harshly as serial killers?



Interesting question Vincent. We have had our share of spree killers in the UK, thankfully not too many. Serial Killers are something else though, in my view these people are sociopaths that are inherently evil, as against someone who has just "snapped".

One, Dr Harold Shipman, recently carried out a murderous string of killings over several decades. he killed at least 250 patients, the true figure is probably considerably higher. Ironically there was a precedent here in the 1940s and 50s, one Dr Bodkin, said to have murdered 150+ patients. he was found not guilty at trial but there was no inquiry. If a thorough inquiry had taken place, the deaths by Shipman may have been preventable.




vincentML -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/17/2012 5:11:17 AM)

quote:

There is no answer to the nature-nurture question, as the question presupposes a dichotomy; the more that we study serial or mass killers, or the easier subject of the various behaviors that make up Autism Spectrum Disorder, the more the balance between biological and social/family/experience influences is revealed. And while the new tools of MRI brain scanning, DNA scanning and genetics, and sensitive biochemistry will give us clues to the biological factors, the effects of parenting and social relationships will likely remain relatively unquantified and elusive. Environmental factors lack similar quantitative tools and for obvious ethical reasons must depend on case studies, statistical analysis and animal experimentation.

Yes, you make a lot of sense. Nancy Lanza, the killer's mother, had a serious problem herself about being "prepared for anything" and was a gun nut, according to reports.

Here is a lengthy article in The New Republic which includes, in addition to the problems of older mothers and chemicals used to induce fertilization, the working hypothesis that older sperm have gone through so many gamete divisions to magnify the number of genetic defects. Then there is the study of epigenetics which finds markers that indicate genes are affected by environmental factors in utero and out.

In this present case recall, there is an older brother living away from the mother and killer. Which raises the question of why one and not the other. The unibomber, Ted Kaczynski, also had a brother, who btw turned him in. I realize we all have our own environment through which we develop, but these sibling differences seem too extreme to fault environment. Handicapped here by small samples. I imagine there are large sibling studies for the effects of parenting environment.

The New Republic Article is here. You may have to give them an email address to gain access.




meatcleaver -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/17/2012 5:15:51 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


Yes, mostly. There is the exception: the Aurora batman killer James Holmes is caught and awaiting trial. Breivik is in jail in Norway.Serial killers OTH are not suicidal. I raise two issues: 1. is it moral for a society to kill killers? 2. Can we learn from them to develop preventative strategies?



Breivik had a political agenda so no matter how warped his cause, you can liken him to Al qaeda or IRA or Unionist terrorists who see killing innocent people as politically legitimate. The Aurora batman, well...you could probably enlighten me.

I don't believe in state sanctioned murder, which is what executions are, are a legitimate punishment in a society which claims to be civilised. State executions are too often abused anyway and have often been abused for political vindictiveness or for getting rid of political problems.

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Not everyone shares your seemingly extreme nihilism. Many, perhaps including you, believe we can construct our own meaningfulness for the short time we are here. Andrea Yates and James Holmes displayed and were diagnosed with serious mental illness/depression.


Saying there is probably no life after death is not nihilistic, it is being rational on the current evidence since no one has come back and told us they're having a wail of a time post life.

I would be more likely to believe a diagnosis of mental illness before an event than after an event. Psychiatrists are similar to economist, they have 20-20 vision with hindsight but are almost blind when it comes to foresight.




ChatteParfaitt -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/17/2012 5:32:13 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PowerXXXchange


There is so much we don't know... what is it that we know pretty much for sure?

In terms of cause, we know that serial or mass killers have one major factor in common - they are almost entirely males. This is a story that will not be fully explained biologically without involving that simple molecule, testosterone, and its relation to brain development, especially the development of centers related to empathy.

I responded to this in an earlier post; there have been plenty of female serial killers.

There is no answer to the nature-nurture question, as the question presupposes a dichotomy; the more that we study serial or mass killers, or the easier subject of the various behaviors that make up Autism Spectrum Disorder, the more the balance between biological and social/family/experience influences is revealed. And while the new tools of MRI brain scanning, DNA scanning and genetics, and sensitive biochemistry will give us clues to the biological factors, the effects of parenting and social relationships will likely remain relatively unquantified and elusive. Environmental factors lack similar quantitative tools and for obvious ethical reasons must depend on case studies, statistical analysis and animal experimentation.


What is being learned about DNA this very minute is that the gestalt of who we are genetically is hugely complicated. Your DNA might be coded for a particular personality trait that will only be triggered if there is an environmental issue along with a nurture issue. Scientists are in the very baby stages of learning about this fascinating discovery. (Mine from an earlier post. We *ARE* learning the answers to nature, nurture, and environment, though admittedly much work needs to be done in this area. )


They are all males, lacking empathy as a mental defect and we do not know why. Professor Simon Baron Cohen says it better than I...

here

So we have as a society about 1 in 100 beautiful male babies who will develop some level of ASD, and who show signs of it at birth.

Yet, as an older relative of two young boys, both with enough ASD behaviours to keep them from attending the preschool of their parents’ choice, as well a long time close friend with an Asperger’s child living on the streets, I am personally amazed at the power of environmental factors to moderate their dysfunctional behaviors forbetter or worse.


Then I suspect you have never been a parent. Being a parent teaches you that lack of good nurturing and extreme abuse creates major dysfunction in the emerging personality. And, if you are paying attention, it also teaches you that your children are born who they are, and though environment and great parenting can shape them to a certain extent, people appear to be born with various personality traits.

The problem I see is that our wildly ahistorical culture is often toxic to children. Farm families of the last century had utilitarian places for moody and introverted children. Both parents were typically present and extended family was also there to relieve or augment poor parenting. There was a vocational future: animals needed tending and didn't require a finely tuned empathy (check out the relationship between ASD and pet ownership) Life was much more solitary.

How long will it take to sort out causes? And how long thereafter for that knowledge to be politically digested and the values of freedom weighed against a more wholesome culture?

I am sad that over the near future this will not be the last mass killing that we will see, or the largest. It is the fourth that Obama has flown to in his first term, so a rough estimate is one a year of national magnitude... ugh.

In the meantime, maybe it's time to play a video game and bake Christmas cookies with an introverted child. That's one other thing we know to do, it helps, and it’s fun too.

I'd been very careful of allowing a young child to play violent video games or watch violent TV or movies. Studies have shown this shapes the developing brain, and NOT in a good way.



PxC





Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875