RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


tj444 -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/17/2012 10:31:24 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

In this present case recall, there is an older brother living away from the mother and killer. Which raises the question of why one and not the other. The unibomber, Ted Kaczynski, also had a brother, who btw turned him in. I realize we all have our own environment through which we develop, but these sibling differences seem too extreme to fault environment. Handicapped here by small samples. I imagine there are large sibling studies for the effects of parenting environment.


birth order? I know books have been written on the fairly predictable traits a person has just based on that.. not that I am saying it plays a major role, just a factor perhaps..




Rule -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/17/2012 10:47:35 AM)

There appears to be a strange misconception that all people are born with identical minds and that how they turn out is due only to how they are raised.

Whereas the truth is that people are born with minds that may have one or more functionalities and / or that lack one or more functionalities (nature) and that what they have (nature) may be influenced by nurture.

I invite anyone who believes that nurture can supersede nature, to condition a number of scorpions not to sting people and to let their small offspring play with them scorpions.

See also: The scorpion and the frog




tj444 -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/17/2012 11:06:41 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

There appears to be a strange misconception that all people are born with identical minds and that how they turn out is due only to how they are raised.


I never said anything of the sort..




jlf1961 -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/17/2012 12:13:08 PM)

Psychopathy and sociopathy have a genetic predisposition.

Environment can mitigate the genetic disposition, but not eliminate it.

Psychopathy can show up as early as 6 years of age, but is impossible to diagnose with any accuracy prior to the mid teens.

Sociopaths can function in society with no problems, the most successful businessmen show the symptoms of being a sociopath.




vincentML -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/17/2012 12:25:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Many, perhaps including you, believe we can construct our own meaningfulness for the short time we are here.


It seems the guy in Connecticut did just that, which illustrates the limitations of constructing meaningfulness per se.

Similarly, Breivik had an altruistic form of meaningfulness that wasn't exactly very palatable, either.

One sadly can't differentiate these from the "good" ones in any objective sense.

IWYW,
— Aswad.


I never suggested my meaningfulness would be acceptable to anyone else, just that it is mine and I constructed it within the social parameters which confronted me. Picking and choosing subconsciously and emotionally probably.




meatcleaver -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/17/2012 2:00:45 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Psychopathy and sociopathy have a genetic predisposition.



There is no evidence for that, in fact what evidence there is points the other way, psychopaths and sociopaths are created. through experience and environment, genetic dispositions being a shorthand for we don't know, we're guessing. What we do know is that chemicals in the environment can become chemical switchs which turn genes on and off, as can experience. The fact is that when it comes to the vast majority of genes and what they actually do, we are still totally clueless.




jlf1961 -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/17/2012 2:24:36 PM)

quote:

Psychopathy appears to be comprised of two broad dimensions: impulsivity/antisocial behavior and interpersonal detachment/callousness. This study examined the extent to which variance in these 2 psychopathy trait dimensions was associated with common or unique genetic, shared, and nonshared environmental factors in two independent samples of reared together 16–18-year-old male twins. One sample included 142 monozygotic (MZ) and 70 dizygotic (DZ) pairs; the other sample included 128 MZ and 58 DZ pairs. Boys completed the Minnesota Temperament Inventory (MTI), a 19-item measure that contains separate subscales: Antisocial and Detachment. Variance in the Antisocial and Detachment scales was associated with additive genetic factors and neither scale was associated with shared environmental factors. As expected, the bivariate biometric analysis suggested genetic influence on the covariance of the scales. The results are consistent with theoretical models of psychopathy that posit some independence in the etiology of the two major trait dimensions of psychopathy.


source

May I say....

BULLSHIT.




meatcleaver -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/17/2012 2:29:11 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

quote:

Psychopathy appears to be comprised of two broad dimensions: impulsivity/antisocial behavior and interpersonal detachment/callousness. This study examined the extent to which variance in these 2 psychopathy trait dimensions was associated with common or unique genetic, shared, and nonshared environmental factors in two independent samples of reared together 16–18-year-old male twins. One sample included 142 monozygotic (MZ) and 70 dizygotic (DZ) pairs; the other sample included 128 MZ and 58 DZ pairs. Boys completed the Minnesota Temperament Inventory (MTI), a 19-item measure that contains separate subscales: Antisocial and Detachment. Variance in the Antisocial and Detachment scales was associated with additive genetic factors and neither scale was associated with shared environmental factors. As expected, the bivariate biometric analysis suggested genetic influence on the covariance of the scales. The results are consistent with theoretical models of psychopathy that posit some independence in the etiology of the two major trait dimensions of psychopathy.


source

May I say....

BULLSHIT.


If you read the first sentence it says Psychopathy appears to be comprised of two broad dimensions:

The clue is in 'appears' and 'broad' which is shorthand for 'We are clueless but we think it maybe, could be, possibly be, there is a chane it is etc etc etc.'




Aswad -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/17/2012 3:05:21 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

Not at all. I'm just giving as good as I get. ;-)


Against that scoring system, the gods themselves contend in vain.

IWYW,
— Aswad.




Aswad -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/17/2012 3:14:31 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

It isn't bullshit at all. It is why ordinary people can kill in a war, they have the approval of their leaders and peers. In a more extreme form it was how the German nation could be seduced in the 30s.


Actually, the reason why ordinary people can kill in a war is because they're desensitized and habituated through extensive training, without which most just stand around pretending to be shooting when they in fact are not. And you seem to neglect that I've already noted that the argument is quite simply too far up in cloudcuckooland for me to bother pull it back down to Earth.

quote:

It depends who and where you are. The Iraqis got the brunt of American and British approved killing at the beginning of this decade. You can hardly say that was peaceful. Just because the violence is perpetrated on another society, doesn't make it less violent.


And even so, there's been less violence, all in all.

Go read the argument and the sources, instead of waving about things that were already factored into it.

quote:

The mind is more complex than that.


I'm quite aware of the complexities of the human mind, and, more importantly, the scope of what I don't know; give the latter a go at some point.

quote:

But feel free to live in a simple world where everything is so obvious.


Thanks, I will.

quote:

Except the solutions of course.


If you want an obvious improvement, look at the socioeconomics involved.

I'm not a big believer in perfect solutions.

IWYW,
— Aswad.




Aswad -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/17/2012 3:28:34 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Environment can mitigate the genetic disposition, but not eliminate it.


Stop thinking in terms of what's absent, and start thinking in terms of what's present; as a rule, that approach has greater predictive power by far. Rule gave a fairly clear and reasonably accurate accounting of this part: there is stuff present from nature, which will develop based on the influences present, into a result that is the product of its parts, more or less.

If you start throwing in negatives, absences and the like, you're back to epicycles, making a big song and dance to work around what should be the blatantly obvious solution: working with what actually is, instead of what might be or usually is or isn't. On occasion, we need to work with what we don't have, but it's an error prone process and often needlessly complicated, so it should be reserved for when there isn't a better solution on hand, and here we do have a better solution.

The environment doesn't mitigate or eliminate a disposition, genetic or otherwise, it just participates in the integrative process which goes from a template to a fully fleshed out person. If one lacks empathy, it isn't a question of the environment mitigating the lack, but rather a question of how what remains develops in a given environment. In some cases, the result can be remarkably close to having empathy, in fact. In other cases, you can have a person with normal empathy, developing to a result which is indistinguishable from not having any.

The error is similar to conflating the obverse with the converse or the inverse.

IWYW,
— Aswad.




Rule -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/17/2012 4:33:29 PM)

lol




PowerXXXchange -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/17/2012 7:47:36 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt


quote:

ORIGINAL: PowerXXXchange


SNIP

In terms of cause, we know that serial or mass killers have one major factor in common - they are almost entirely males.

there have been plenty of female serial killers.

For example...

Characteristics of Serial Killers Active Since 1900 (N = 558)
Offender Category Percentage

Sex
Male 85.8%
Female 14.2%
Total 100.0%


By this FBI statistic 79 females, which I will ggrant you is "plenty". The point is they are outnumbered by ~7:1 by males, roughly the male -female ratio for all gun homicides, roughly the same ratio as for autism diagnoses.



What is being learned about DNA this very minute is that the gestalt of who we are genetically is hugely complicated. Your DNA might be coded for a particular personality trait that will only be triggered if there is an environmental issue along with a nurture issue. Scientists are in the very baby stages of learning about this fascinating discovery. (Mine from an earlier post. We *ARE* learning the answers to nature, nurture, and environment, though admittedly much work needs to be done in this area. )

Agreed. Would you like to comment on the ASD/empathy studies relative to hormonal (testosterone) levels in utero?

here

So we have as a society about 1 in 100 beautiful male babies who will develop some level of ASD, and who show signs of it at birth.

I am personally amazed at the power of environmental factors to moderate their dysfunctional behaviors forbetter or worse.


Then I suspect you have never been a parent. Being a parent teaches you that lack of good nurturing and extreme abuse creates major dysfunction in the emerging personality. And, if you are paying attention, it also teaches you that your children are born who they are, and though environment and great parenting can shape them to a certain extent, people appear to be born with various personality traits.


A very bad guess: I was an active involved parent, and have two model adult chidren, in happy relationships and two beautiful grandsons. They have the manners not to make condescending assumptions, which makes them better in that way than me.


I'd been very careful of allowing a young child to play violent video games or watch violent TV or movies. Studies have shown this shapes the developing brain, and NOT in a good way.

I am glad you are also aware of the effect of violent media on children. Your apparent assumption that all video games are violent probably says something about this toxic culture.


PxC





jlf1961 -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/17/2012 9:20:13 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Environment can mitigate the genetic disposition, but not eliminate it.


Stop thinking in terms of what's absent, and start thinking in terms of what's present; as a rule, that approach has greater predictive power by far. Rule gave a fairly clear and reasonably accurate accounting of this part: there is stuff present from nature, which will develop based on the influences present, into a result that is the product of its parts, more or less.

If you start throwing in negatives, absences and the like, you're back to epicycles, making a big song and dance to work around what should be the blatantly obvious solution: working with what actually is, instead of what might be or usually is or isn't. On occasion, we need to work with what we don't have, but it's an error prone process and often needlessly complicated, so it should be reserved for when there isn't a better solution on hand, and here we do have a better solution.

The environment doesn't mitigate or eliminate a disposition, genetic or otherwise, it just participates in the integrative process which goes from a template to a fully fleshed out person. If one lacks empathy, it isn't a question of the environment mitigating the lack, but rather a question of how what remains develops in a given environment. In some cases, the result can be remarkably close to having empathy, in fact. In other cases, you can have a person with normal empathy, developing to a result which is indistinguishable from not having any.

The error is similar to conflating the obverse with the converse or the inverse.

IWYW,
— Aswad.




Okay, how are you going to determine if someone is a possible dangerous psychopath before he acts against someone, or group? I have heard a suggestion about genetic testing at birth for genetically transferred diseases, you suggest we do it for this problem?




meatcleaver -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/18/2012 12:38:42 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

Not at all. I'm just giving as good as I get. ;-)


Against that scoring system, the gods themselves contend in vain.

IWYW,
— Aswad.



When someone claims to know you and what your life is like, the exchange stops being a discussion and becomes something personal.




meatcleaver -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/18/2012 12:50:36 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad


Actually, the reason why ordinary people can kill in a war is because they're desensitized and habituated through extensive training, without which most just stand around pretending to be shooting when they in fact are not. And you seem to neglect that I've already noted that the argument is quite simply too far up in cloudcuckooland for me to bother pull it back down to Earth.


How do you account for resistence groups that have never been military trained? There is peer support and leadership sanctioned. People don't need to be desensitized to kill or we wouldn't have so many murders.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad


And even so, there's been less violence, all in all.

Go read the argument and the sources, instead of waving about things that were already factored into it.



You know that is rubbish. Crime declined from a high in the 90s but is still significantly higher than the 50s, 60s and mid 70s and is predicted to climb again during the next years because of a worsening economy.

The west has always exported violence since the beginning of the capitalist/imperial age and it is not declining with western power as we can see with the mess in the ME.




Aswad -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/18/2012 4:10:54 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Okay, how are you going to determine if someone is a possible dangerous psychopath before he acts against someone, or group?


You ask the three oracles.

Or, you wait until people have actually committed a crime before you go after them, since the alternative is to be the one initiating an attack and thus the concept of a crime becomes rather nonsensical. We can't protect people from life itself, and it would be worse than killing to do so, anyway.

quote:

I have heard a suggestion about genetic testing at birth for genetically transferred diseases, you suggest we do it for this problem?


No, I actually advocate proper child rearing, and not fiddling with behavioral genetics, ever.

IWYW,
— Aswad.




Aswad -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/18/2012 4:16:58 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

How do you account for resistence groups that have never been military trained?


The difference between a resistance group and a military is that the former are defenders, while the latter are trained to be attackers and defenders both (mostly attackers in some areas). When your back is to the wall and there are people shooting those you care about, it's a lot easier to go kill, because it's perceived as self defense. When you're not in a perceived self defense situation, it's a lot harder to go out to kill people, which is why militaries around the world train to enable regular people to do so, even though few are wired to.

quote:

There is peer support and leadership sanctioned.


This helps, cf. Milgram, but it's by no means the main factor, as you contended.

quote:

People don't need to be desensitized to kill or we wouldn't have so many murders.


Incentive works fine, and not everyone is equally inhibited.

quote:

You know that is rubbish. Crime declined from a high in the 90s but is still significantly higher than the 50s, 60s and mid 70s and is predicted to climb again during the next years because of a worsening economy.


You can write it off as rubbish as much as you like.

For someone claiming to have rational beliefs, you're remarkably disinterested in the evidence.

quote:

The west has always exported violence since the beginning of the capitalist/imperial age and it is not declining with western power as we can see with the mess in the ME.


Never said GWB is on the list of sources of happiness in my world.

IWYW,
— Aswad.




vincentML -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/18/2012 4:53:38 AM)

~FR~
Here is a list of 64 worldwide school rampage attackers, which I posted elsewhere also. Twenty-five commited suicide. Notably, in China only one of 21 committed suicide. So, removing 20 (China) from the 64 we find that 25 of 44 commited suicide. Statistically, of course, this is not a significant sample of anything. However, it suggests that depression may play a large part in the mental calculations of the killers. Certainly seems to be so in the cases of Lanza, Yates, and Holmes. (Yates was a home killer)

Note also while there are 21 China incidents in the list only 17 from the US. Clearly, China and the US do not have the same culture of violence, violent movies, or violent video games. Again, a small sample but it suggests the causes lie with individual mental disorder and not with national cultural traits, unless one can supply evidence that US culture induces depression significantly moreso than other cultures.

Also, gives evidence that the prevalence of guns in the US is not a motivating factor but a utilitarian one.

Any comments?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_rampage_killers:_School_massacres

The US is 38th on this list, below the Scandinavian countries, which have markedly less violent cultures.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_suicide_rate




ChatteParfaitt -> RE: Punishment Retribution Rehabilitation (12/18/2012 4:57:39 AM)

You *also* said all serial killers are male; this is a direct quote from post #70:

quote:

They are all males, lacking empathy as a mental defect and we do not know why. Professor Simon Baron Cohen says it better than I...


So why you would counter with your other quote of 'almost entirely' male I have no idea -- 14% is to my mind not almost entirely, but let's agree to disagree, I'm feeling benevolent this morning.

The link you embedded is to a YouTube (how laughable), in any case I'm not familiar with the study, why don't you paraphrase it for us?

That's great you have 'model adult children' - whatever that means. I don't have model adult children, I have adult children who have both broken the mold in a huge way and have dared to be themselves, not some cookie cutter idea of what society thought they should be.

I don't assume all video games are violent, I do assume most parents don't care if they are violent or not. This is based on my own experience of raising my children, when their peers were allowed to see and do all kinds of things my children were not.

If you are not one of those kinds of people, great ! This world, most especially in the US, needs more adults capable of understanding that tiny developing brains needs some *real* guidance and that exposing them to violence is not it.








Page: <<   < prev  4 5 6 [7] 8   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625