Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Gun facts


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Gun facts Page: <<   < prev  4 5 6 [7] 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Gun facts - 12/18/2012 6:10:37 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael

Lets keep the politics out of this one...i just wanted to get some facts out there.

Assault weapons and their civillian equivelents are LESS powerful than your average deer rifle, WWII or WWI rifle. The importance of lethality fell and wounding became important or at least just as good.

Hunting rifles are more powerful, shoot farther and are more accurate.

Your typical pump shotgun is far more concealible and easily as deadly as an assialt weapon.

The most common weapins used in crimes are mossberg pump ahotgons, h&r single ahot shotguns, and glenfield model 60 .22 rifles. Probably cause they are cheap, poor people own em and poor people steal from otger poor people.


Banning handguns wont work because any idiot with a hacksaw can turn ahotguns into handguns.

Now, please keep this thread technical if we can


Michael, I appreciate your comments...you've always added value.

Aside from the fact that I can't read your comments because they don't represent anything even remotely reflecting the English language...I'll add (from inference) that we agree.

No one needs magazines or guns that allow someone to cut someone in half with one pull, in 0.173897538 seconds.

(in reply to SimplyMichael)
Profile   Post #: 121
RE: Gun facts - 12/18/2012 6:32:31 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Since when does the wealth of the country determine murder rate?


The twenty worst homicide rates occur in countries at the bottom of the economic scale, except for Bahamas and Trinidad.
The twenty best homicide rates occur in countries at the top of the economic scale, except for Guam, Bahrain and Palau.

In Europe, the best ten are, with parenthesized PPP; murder rate / gun ownership rate, ordered by ascending intentional homicide rate:

Monaco ($63K; 0.0/unknown)
Iceland ($38K; 0.3/30.3)
Norway ($54K; 0.6/31.3)
Austria ($42K; 0.6/30.4)
Slovenia ($29K; 0.7/13.5)
Switzerland ($43K; 0.7/45.7)
Spain ($31K; 0.8/10.4)
Germany ($38K; 0.8/30.3)
Denmark ($37K; 0.9/12.0)
Italy ($31K; 0.9/11.9)


From $29K to $63K, with gun ownership typically about 30 pr 100 capita and averaging 24, with murder rates below 1 pr 100.000 capita per year, averaging 0.63.

The ten worst, in Europe, in order of descending intentional homicide rate, same convention:

Greenland ($37K; 19.2/unknown)
Russia ($19K; 10.2/8.9)
Moldova ($3K; 7.5/7.1)
Lithuania ($19K; 6.6/0.7)
Estonia ($20K; 5.2/9.2)
Ukraine ($7K; 5.2/6.6)
Belarus ($15K; 4.9/7.3)
Georgia ($5K; 4.3/7.3)
Albania ($8K; 4.0/8.6)
Montenegro ($11K; 3.5/23.1)


From $5K to $20K, with gun ownership averaging 8~9 per 100 capita, and murder rates averaging 7 per 100.000 capita per year.

For comparison:
United States of America ($48K; 4.2/88.8)

It's tempting to ascribe it to the number of guns, but I think we need a better factor analysis before making a confident assertion, given that we're interested in the net number of murders, and what influence gun control might have on the net number. Also, per state figures would be interesting, since Iowa (high gun ownership) is comparable to Canada in homicide rates, while Washington DC (median gun ownership) is more comparable to Congo or South Africa, and Connecticut and New Jersey (both low gun ownership) are comparable to the worst European countries.

quote:

So what you are trying to say is that among civilized countries the United States leads the world in homicide rates.


No, I'm saying you're lagging behind in most areas of civilization as a people, and it may contribute to your very high homicide rates.

And I'm saying I want a model that has some reasonable degree of predictive power across nations. Why not set aside a billion or so to collect any data that aren't already being collected, worldwide, then do a diachronic factor analysis to figure out what is most likely to get you the desired results, then work from that and use feedback to refine the model?

IWYW,
— Aswad.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 122
RE: Gun facts - 12/18/2012 6:33:56 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

My reply should be self evident to any person with a functioning brain.


I think you may be neglecting that you're predicting a dysfunction as the norm.

IWYW,
— Aswad.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 123
RE: Gun facts - 12/18/2012 7:00:00 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

The preferred method used by psychiatrists on patients appears to be to put them on medication for life; which in my opinion makes them an addictive-drugs dealer rather than a medic.


Around these parts, the situation is different.

I favor what Professor Emeritus Einar Kringlen, Dr. Med., the nestor of forensic psychiatry here, said during the Breivik trial:

«This is a question of good and bad psychiatrists.»

He's been on the board of medical excellence for nearly 70 years, and has written reference works on the etiology and epidemology of mental illness, including twin studies, as well as on the contemporary history of psychiatry, the relation of psychiatry to society, substance abuse, personality disorders, compulsive disorders, etc., and the definite reference on psychiatry as a field here, along with editing some psychiatric journals, heading up a psychiatry department, teaching psychiatry, research, and so forth.

IWYW,
— Aswad.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to Rule)
Profile   Post #: 124
RE: Gun facts - 12/18/2012 7:02:58 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: adx

its scary how some are so willing to give away our rights.


Not at all. The scary thing is they're willing to give away the rights of others, even the majority, without consent.

IWYW,
— Aswad.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to adx)
Profile   Post #: 125
RE: Gun facts - 12/18/2012 7:05:55 PM   
SimplyMichael


Posts: 7229
Joined: 1/7/2007
Status: offline
Whats weird is most of my fellow liberals bitch about police brutality and corporate media.

But when it comes to gun control their faith in those two suddenly becomes absolute

(in reply to Aswad)
Profile   Post #: 126
RE: Gun facts - 12/18/2012 7:17:55 PM   
Powergamz1


Posts: 1927
Joined: 9/3/2011
Status: offline
+1 Phil Ochs caught on to that a long time ago.
quote:

ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael

Whats weird is most of my fellow liberals bitch about police brutality and corporate media.

But when it comes to gun control their faith in those two suddenly becomes absolute



_____________________________

"DOMA is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment" Anthony McLeod Kennedy

" About damn time...wooot!!' Me

(in reply to SimplyMichael)
Profile   Post #: 127
RE: Gun facts - 12/18/2012 7:24:02 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad

quote:

ORIGINAL: adx

its scary how some are so willing to give away our rights.


Not at all. The scary thing is they're willing to give away the rights of others, even the majority, without consent.

IWYW,
— Aswad.



While I am not one of them, there are people who are willing to give up their right to bear arms.

Fifty-seven percent of Americans think gun laws should be stricter, according to a CBS News poll, with 9 percent thinking they should be made less strict and 30 percent hoping for no change at all.

The CBS poll is the second in recent days to show recent highs in support for gun control. Fifty-four percent of Americans in an ABC/Washington Post poll supported tighter gun control, a five-year high.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2012/12/rising-support-for-gun-control-poll-shows-85225.html#ixzz2FSrSh0Oi

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Aswad)
Profile   Post #: 128
RE: Gun facts - 12/18/2012 7:29:14 PM   
Marini


Posts: 3629
Joined: 2/14/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael

Whats weird is most of my fellow liberals bitch about police brutality and corporate media.

But when it comes to gun control their faith in those two suddenly becomes absolute


Interesting observation, most of us "hippies" know we can "Never fully trust the man!"
lol


_____________________________

As always, To EACH their Own.
"And as we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other people permission to do the same. "
Nelson Mandela
Life-long Democrat, not happy at all with Democratic Party.
NOT a Republican/Moderate and free agent

(in reply to SimplyMichael)
Profile   Post #: 129
RE: Gun facts - 12/19/2012 12:44:26 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

My reply should be self evident to any person with a functioning brain.


I think you may be neglecting that you're predicting a dysfunction as the norm.



That comment in context was referring to the state of psychiatry and mental health diagnosis which is at a level equivalent to surgery still being in the barbers shop.

What is dysfunction? Even mental health professionals can only diagnose it in extremes. Some will say dysfunction is the norm because thereis no definition of the norm.

_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to Aswad)
Profile   Post #: 130
RE: Gun facts - 12/19/2012 2:40:38 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata
quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveby12
something that has no other purpose but to kill.

Firearms are designed to cause injury to what they hit. Period. Said injury may or may not be fatal, according to shot placement. Shooting to wound rather than kill can be a sound military strategy when it will cause the enemy to divert scarce fuel and personnel resources to transport and care. In that kind of shooting scenario, a wounded enemy is better than a dead one! So not even military rifles can be said to have "no other purpose but to kill".


This is not about nation on nation styled military combat. This is some lunatic with a Bushmaster, rushing into a 1st grader's classroom and slaughtering many, defenseless little children at point blank range with the full intent on causing as much death and destruction in as little time as possible. Otherwise, he would have used a FREAKING MUSKET!!!!

What you are arguing to slaveby12 is completely irrelevent. Firearms were designed with only one purpose: TO KILL. During World War One, with the trench warefare that took place, the thought was to create a weapon that would wound. thereby forcing the enemy to remove two more soldiers from the lines (whom carried their wounded comrade from the lines to the hospital). If you want a weapon that doesnt kill your target, pick up some mace or invest a few years in a martial arts form. A firearm is meant to be easy to operate, send many rounds down range, in a very short amount of time, and KILL THE ENEMY!

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 131
RE: Gun facts - 12/19/2012 3:01:59 AM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marini

quote:

ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael

Whats weird is most of my fellow liberals bitch about police brutality and corporate media.

But when it comes to gun control their faith in those two suddenly becomes absolute


Interesting observation, most of us "hippies" know we can "Never fully trust the man!"
lol


I was also influenced by hippies when I was growing up and grew to respect their position. Mistrust of the government was very strong back in those days, especially among liberals. I'm not sure what happened, but I think most of the hippies sold out by the time Reagan became president.

I think that the late great George Carlin summed up this group better than anyone I've heard: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pR8aFDosQBQ

"They went from 'do your own thing' to 'just say no.' They went from 'love is all you need' to 'he who dies with the most toys wins.' And they went from cocaine to Rogaine."





(in reply to Marini)
Profile   Post #: 132
RE: Gun facts - 12/19/2012 3:06:04 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: adx
its scary how some are so willing to give away our rights.


An some give new meanings to the rights that were never originally intended. You and I, do not have a right to a firearm. I know that will be hard for you to understand or accept. The 2nd amendment never states the individual's right to a firearm for 'what ever purpose they feel like'. It was quite specific, as a condition to a 'A Well Regulated Militia...". Back when that document was created, the United States didnt have standing police stations in every village, town and city. Nor a professional, standing army with multiple nuclear powered carrier fleets. They had the militia. The militia was designed to act as both an emergency police force and an army as the commanding officers (and Governor of the state) decided.

"...the right to bear arms...." was meant to explain that the individual could have a firearm, but its purpose was strictly for the militia in question. Any arm beyond those used by the militia, would be, according to the founding fathers, handled by the individual states (as per the 10th Amendment). If an individual state decided to ban a firearm make or model, that was well within the people's wishs through voting. Either directly (i.e. ballot question) or indirectly (those voted to represent the people). It would not be a violation so long as the arms in question, were not currently being used by the militia.

"....shall not be infringed." This little gem is the OTHER part of the four that has equally been fouled up. This one does not state 'goverment can not make a law, outlawing an individual's 'right' to a firearm'. Actually, the belief back in the early state's days, was much different. If the Governor could call up a militia to handle a domestic or foreign problem, and that militia had to obey; could the Governor, trying to create a tyrannical goverment, order the militia to surrender thier arms? The answer was 'no'. It was created, so that a militia, would never find itself at odds with either the citizens they represented, or placing their village, town, or city in jeapordy of being called a traitor! It had nothing to do with some gun-nut holding an unlimited right to any sort of firearm they believed they should have (i.e. an M-249).

So who do you think, pushed the idea into American's minds that the 2nd Amendment means that you or I could have any sort of firearm we wanted, without being a member of a local militia in good standing (to the militia, the town, and state), nor needing some sort of 'checks and balances' to make sure things didnt get out of hand? I'm going to guess, "Someone that wanted to make a PILE OF MONEY!" But they wouldnt do it directly, or else people would simply make the connection. So they create an organization, to which they support financially, to change the view of the original concept into something else by which the newer members of society wouldn't realize was changed.

< Message edited by joether -- 12/19/2012 3:10:18 AM >

(in reply to adx)
Profile   Post #: 133
RE: Gun facts - 12/19/2012 3:37:50 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

An some give new meanings to the rights that were never originally intended. You and I, do not have a right to a firearm. I know that will be hard for you to understand or accept. The 2nd amendment never states the individual's right to a firearm...

Thanks for your facts. What do you think we should do about the Senate?

The conclusion is thus inescapable that the history, concept, and wording of the second amendment to the Constitution of the United States, as well as its interpretation by every major commentator and court in the first half-century after its ratification, indicates that what is protected is an individual right of a private citizen to own and carry firearms in a peaceful manner. ~Report of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Subcommittee on the Constitution, 97th Congress, Second Session

K.


< Message edited by Kirata -- 12/19/2012 3:39:33 AM >

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 134
RE: Gun facts - 12/19/2012 3:50:44 AM   
crazyml


Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether

quote:

ORIGINAL: adx
its scary how some are so willing to give away our rights.


An some give new meanings to the rights that were never originally intended. You and I, do not have a right to a firearm.


This is incorrect. You and I don't have the right to interpret the law as we choose. The highest authority when it comes to interpreting the meaning of the law, and the constitution, is the supreme court.



quote:


I know that will be hard for you to understand or accept. The 2nd amendment never states the individual's right to a firearm for 'what ever purpose they feel like'.


That is your opinion. Which has no legal bearing whatsoever.

The opinion of the Supreme Court differs. And... I know that this might be hard for you to understand or accept... their opinion is the only one that counts for shit in the context of interpreting the 2nd Amendment.



quote:




It was quite specific, as a condition to a 'A Well Regulated Militia...".
Blah blah blah blah .... pointles blah... blah blah blah blah blah .... pointles blah... blah blah blah blah blah .... pointles blah... blah blah blah blah blah .... pointles blah... blah blah blah blah blah .... pointles blah... blah blah blah blah blah .... pointles blah... blah blah blah blah blah .... pointles blah... blah blah blah blah blah .... pointles blah... blah blah blah blah blah .... pointles blah... blah blah blah blah blah .... pointles blah... blah blah blah blah blah .... pointles blah... blah blah blah blah blah .... pointles blah... blah blah blah blah blah .... pointles blah... blah blah blah blah blah .... pointles blah... blah blah blah blah blah .... pointles blah... blah blah blah blah blah .... pointles blah... blah blah blah blah blah .... pointles blah... blah blah


_____________________________

Remember.... There's always somewhere on the planet where it's jackass o'clock.

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 135
RE: Gun facts - 12/19/2012 7:21:10 AM   
Powergamz1


Posts: 1927
Joined: 9/3/2011
Status: offline
If you don't know the difference between psychology, and psychiatry, you can't really contribute much of value, can you?


Just because words start with the same few letters doesn't make them perfectly synonymous.
quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

quote:

ORIGINAL: Powergamz1
That claim is impossible to believe. Psychiatrists are MDs, and the fact that you don't grasp that, or understand that neuro-science is part of the medical field, renders your opinions about either useless.
quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver
My first job was in mental health 30 years ago, I wasn't in it long before I decided to become an artist but I still have a several friends in the field, two who are phychaitrists and in private they are pretty scathing about the level of knowledge in their profession and how little is based on science and how neuro-science is making their whole profession question the intellectual foundations psychiatry is built on.


I kinda side with Meatcleaver on this. Admittedly psychology has been recognized as a science since about 1990 and admittedly some psychologists are sharp birds - I am up for a psychological diagnosis myself in the near future and I know these people can look right through someone - but much of psychology in my opinion is still in the stone age. The preferred method used by psychiatrists on patients appears to be to put them on medication for life; which in my opinion makes them an addictive-drugs dealer rather than a medic.



_____________________________

"DOMA is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment" Anthony McLeod Kennedy

" About damn time...wooot!!' Me

(in reply to Rule)
Profile   Post #: 136
RE: Gun facts - 12/19/2012 7:43:21 AM   
SimplyMichael


Posts: 7229
Joined: 1/7/2007
Status: offline
Would this be the sam psychology that has taken,forever to wwrite the DSM V?

Or the the one that still thinks most of us should be locked up?

Those people?

(in reply to Powergamz1)
Profile   Post #: 137
RE: Gun facts - 12/19/2012 8:02:15 AM   
Powergamz1


Posts: 1927
Joined: 9/3/2011
Status: offline
If anyone can find a current offical statement from the American Psychological Association that 'most' (over 50%) of the population suffers from conditions requiring being locked up, I'd like to see it.

Are they the ones who put out the DSM? No.
The DSM is a medical manual put out MDs/psychiatrists, not by the American Psychological Association.

And last I checked, the DSM-IVRwas only 12 years ago.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael

Would this be the sam psychology that has taken,forever to wwrite the DSM V?

Or the the one that still thinks most of us should be locked up?

Those people?



< Message edited by Powergamz1 -- 12/19/2012 8:03:05 AM >


_____________________________

"DOMA is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment" Anthony McLeod Kennedy

" About damn time...wooot!!' Me

(in reply to SimplyMichael)
Profile   Post #: 138
RE: Gun facts - 12/19/2012 1:44:18 PM   
DomYngBlk


Posts: 3316
Joined: 3/27/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael

Lets keep the politics out of this one...i just wanted to get some facts out there.

Assault weapons and their civillian equivelents are LESS powerful than your average deer rifle, WWII or WWI rifle. The importance of lethality fell and wounding became important or at least just as good.

Hunting rifles are more powerful, shoot farther and are more accurate.

Your typical pump shotgun is far more concealible and easily as deadly as an assialt weapon.

The most common weapins used in crimes are mossberg pump ahotgons, h&r single ahot shotguns, and glenfield model 60 .22 rifles. Probably cause they are cheap, poor people own em and poor people steal from otger poor people.


Banning handguns wont work because any idiot with a hacksaw can turn ahotguns into handguns.

Now, please keep this thread technical if we can


Well great. then lets not do a fucking thing and let things roll on just like they are.....

(in reply to SimplyMichael)
Profile   Post #: 139
RE: Gun facts - 12/19/2012 1:46:20 PM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Powergamz1

If you don't know the difference between psychology, and psychiatry, you can't really contribute much of value, can you?


Just because words start with the same few letters doesn't make them perfectly synonymous.


YAWN Every time you post a reply to someone, you show your childish desperation to score a point by not reading the reply or taking it out of context.

If your English comprehension was up to scratch you would be able to deconstruct Rule's post and see he does understand the difference between psychology and psychiatry.

_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to Powergamz1)
Profile   Post #: 140
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 6 [7] 8   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Gun facts Page: <<   < prev  4 5 6 [7] 8   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094