Pulpsmack
Posts: 394
Joined: 4/15/2004 From: Louisiana Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: AliceMajesty This will be my last post here, because really I am getting fed up with the ignorant replies. I'd just like to give an example on how I think things should be handled in USA to prevent a continuation of this killing culture. I have given Swedish laws as an example of a largely working system, and I still stand by that point. We're not allowed to carry weapons in public, not guns, not knives, not pepper-spray - and we have a lot less people getting killed. For America, I would institute a lot stricter regulation on fire arms and the public use of them. I would outlaw assault rifles, and regulate hand guns by licences issued only to those that need a hand gun in their job (police, possibly body guards - obviously all requiring extensive mental health examinations). I would make a hunting licence a strict procedure, and allow hunting rifles to those that qualify. I would then issue a time period when people with assault rifles and hand guns can turn them in freely in exchange for something encouraging - this would include all weapons, legally acquired or otherwise. After this period ended, I would start a collection of any no longer legal registered guns that have not been turned in, these would not be exchanged for anything. Having finished that, there would obviously be a number of years that there were still illegally acquired fire arms out there - those would be confiscated as soon as found and slowly be smaller and smaller in number. In addition to this, I would concentrate on bettering border security and limiting the smuggling of weapons into the country as well as an open health care and mental health care to provide the people that need it with help before they do something awful. I would keep nationwide campaigns to give people a better sense of mental illness and make sure anyone who needs help can get it. It would take time, yes, but that's just all the more reason to start as soon as possible. Perhaps you will have the opportunity to read this having ended participation (perhaps not). Nevertheless, you have put forth something constructive here which merits response. For starters, what you have written that is highlighted in red has substantially been observed in California and certain other states, and it has been observed for some time (decades). It is a failing policy and has not ended violent crime with firearms. With respect to what you have written highlighted in blue, the United States has NOT addressed (or addressed sufficiently) and I believe these suggestions are more in line with the solution to the problem. Where you and I would likely disagree is that I believe in the necessity of the points in blue finding those in red burdensome, unsuccessful, and unjust, whereas you believe in implementing both the points in blue and red.
< Message edited by Pulpsmack -- 12/18/2012 5:11:44 AM >
|