|
Extravagasm -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/10/2013 5:44:35 PM)
|
This struggling equivocation about "personal attacks" is a way dishonest defense, to say the least. Is it, or is it not, conceivable to raise OPEN focus on an apparent primary TOS violation, without it being a personal attack on the person themselves? Of course it's possible.
If and when that happens in a sterile way, should it be moded away? Not ideally. Unless this site simply doesn't care about its primary TOS --- meaning those TOS not tucked away in the mind of the beholder or in research pages --- but TOS in enlarged print on various regular access pages. Such as underage use, proper rights to posted pics, financial exchange.
Tazzy says mods hesitate if a violator might come back under a new profile. But that would mean admins have little real clout at all. Enforce more waiting period for new approvals. Heaven forbid that successive profiles would need to be disallowed for the same reason. What if they kept coming back with price lists for children? Time to give up on that too?
Really this idea of what-do-ya-do-then? is precisely what gives forth to other members helping expose. Its not frivolous, because this huge forum thread began over dissatisfaction with the way mods handled Hill stepping up, including a situation when barred persons came back under new profiles.
Another thought for CM: When experienced members step up, consider inviting them to be mods instead of just shooing them back.
(Waits to be sure he doesn't hear any wrenches clicking:) Ciao
|
|
|
|
