tj444
Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam quote:
ORIGINAL: tj444 quote:
ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam The medical examiner is the one who gave permission. An autopsy was ordered which is normal in such cases. When that happens, the ME is given custody of the body. Any and all tests that he or she deems necessary can then be performed. The family can try to prevent it and in some cases a stop can be put to it if they can show compelling evidence (religious for example) that the testing should be discontinued. I personally feel the medical examiner has overstepped his bounds.. imo the family should be able to decide yes or no, not the ME.. so I disagree on moral grounds to his decision to do so.. If I was one of the family I would challenge it.. It is just like the article I posted the link to, there is no way to know how those genes will be used.. and frequently when Universities study such things, the results are sold to Big Pharma to profit from.. which I also disagree with.. I can definitely agree with your points. I was simply pointing out where permission and the chain of custody came from. I understand what you are saying, I just dont agree with the decision.. Lanza's death was the result of being shot (at his own hand), that is quite evident and imo the end of the ME's job description (to determine the cause of death).. not to go any further unless he did get the family's permission to study his genes or brain, etc.. if the ME's rights extend that far, to send genes or the brains of any deceased, then any serial killers genes and brains (that are executed or die in prison), etc are subject to seizure for study.. and then anyone that dies of whatever diseases cant be treated in the same way after death.. I feel that is wrong and immoral.. and the start of a slippery slope..
_____________________________
As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”
|