Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Men hunt : women weed |Why it may be hard to find the perfect counterpart Dom/top or sub/slave on CM


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Men hunt : women weed |Why it may be hard to find the perfect counterpart Dom/top or sub/slave on CM Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Men hunt : women weed |Why it may be hard to find t... - 12/30/2012 11:59:03 AM   
Blankpain


Posts: 127
Joined: 5/20/2010
Status: offline
There are some really memorable quotes in this thread!

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pyramus
why do you think anyone would find it the least bit difficult to quickly locate a suitable kinky counterpart?


quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC
men and women both want an impossibly contradictory set of traits.


quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC
men and women ... are not selling to their target market.


quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC
[men and women] want an opposite gender partner that behaves like their own gender.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Agent99
all men are sluts and all women are whores.


quote:

ORIGINAL: phxgydnar
"All men are rapists ... all women are whores."


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kana
Women have the pussy-thus they get to choose..


quote:

ORIGINAL: ClassAct2006
men show off a pretty younger girl ... Women ... show off someone who is ... above them


quote:

ORIGINAL: tidbit5021
I chalk it up to being picky. :)


quote:

ORIGINAL: littlewonder
men come to sites like this [for] easy sex


quote:

ORIGINAL: slavelyn95008
All the ... perfect [ones] are fake. Only the highly imperfect ones are real.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Spiritedsub2
those ... looking for a relationship will have to exercise more patience and spend more time than those looking for sex


quote:

ORIGINAL: aldorax
I'd prefer to find a person to build a RELATIONSHIP


quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC
Both genders want a wide range of traits that often times don't comfortably sit next to each other.


quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC
The woman is supposed to be both madonna and whore.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Pyramus
the breathtaking odds against [men]


quote:

ORIGINAL: Pyramus
We men have it hard ... It's what being a man means


quote:

ORIGINAL: Pyramus
both have to deal with an enormous amount of duplicity


And, for the final poem of the evening:
quote:

ORIGINAL: Pyramus & ClassAct2006
Men hunt, women weed ... Genghis Khan spread his seed!


(in reply to fetisheden)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Men hunt : women weed |Why it may be hard to find t... - 12/30/2012 12:16:44 PM   
sexyred1


Posts: 8998
Joined: 8/9/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist


quote:

ORIGINAL: Agent99


quote:

ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist
There is never an excuse to have anything negative (negative filters) in your profile. You only should use positive filters.


You're not a woman.

Even negative filters don't completely work for them.

For men though, it's good advice as they should aim as high as they can.

Otherwise, they fail.

I wrote profiles for women. If you present yourself sensually, honestly and elegantly, you automatically scare 90% of the turds away and the quality of your mail inquiries goes up.

Negative remarks are . . . well, would you dare talk that way to handsome successful dominant man you were attracted to in real life? Fuck no! Then why oh why would you do that dumb shit in a profile? If you have stupid negative filters, you only attract asshats that would put up with that kind of bullshit from a woman.


Based on your comments, RS, I should have found the right one by now. I think my profile is just fine.

OP, you can and assess all sorts of statistics and generalizations all you want, but the bottom line is that it is extremely difficult to find someone who is compatible on the important levels and has great chemistry.

If I hear one more time from a man who writes me, "How can you not be taken??" I will scream. I could be taken by people that are unsuitable for me; I prefer to wait to find someone who is.

There are many things wrong with people in the dating world today: terrible communication skills, lack of follow up, dishonesty, over reliance on technology (nothing will EVER replace human contact, voice or writing), impatience, fantasies overruling reality, lack of manners, lack of self awareness, etc. etc.

I am shocked at how hard it is to meet someone these days; and as I get older I am more selective and knowledgeable about the qualities in a man that I NEED, rather than those I WANT or thought were important.

(in reply to ResidentSadist)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Men hunt : women weed |Why it may be hard to find t... - 12/30/2012 12:20:23 PM   
aldorax


Posts: 39
Joined: 3/23/2008
From: MD/DC/VA
Status: offline

quote:


There are many things wrong with people in the dating world today: terrible communication skills, lack of follow up, dishonesty, over reliance on technology (nothing will EVER replace human contact, voice or writing), impatience, fantasies overruling reality, lack of manners, lack of self awareness, etc. etc.

I am shocked at how hard it is to meet someone these days; and as I get older I am more selective and knowledgeable about the qualities in a man that I NEED, rather than those I WANT or thought were important.


Indeed - I think part of your first points I quote are a generational thing, which is quite scary to me. I may be a geek but I appreciate the in-person form of 'communication' versus texting/IM/email. And I agree completely with your second point about how as we age and get more selective, our priorities tend to change (or mature) right alongside us. Grrr, life! :)

(in reply to sexyred1)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Men hunt : women weed |Why it may be hard to find t... - 12/30/2012 2:47:31 PM   
Baroana


Posts: 1480
Joined: 11/13/2011
Status: offline
Maybe I'm just grumpy due to being sick, but I can't believe the dumbness in this thread in the form of ignorance, flawed logic, bigotry, and sweeping generalizations.

(in reply to aldorax)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Men hunt : women weed |Why it may be hard to find t... - 12/30/2012 3:05:19 PM   
ResidentSadist


Posts: 12580
Joined: 2/11/2007
From: a mean old Daddy, but I like you - Joni Mitchell
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: sexyred1


quote:

ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist


quote:

ORIGINAL: Agent99


quote:

ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist
There is never an excuse to have anything negative (negative filters) in your profile. You only should use positive filters.


You're not a woman.

Even negative filters don't completely work for them.

For men though, it's good advice as they should aim as high as they can.

Otherwise, they fail.

I wrote profiles for women. If you present yourself sensually, honestly and elegantly, you automatically scare 90% of the turds away and the quality of your mail inquiries goes up.

Negative remarks are . . . well, would you dare talk that way to handsome successful dominant man you were attracted to in real life? Fuck no! Then why oh why would you do that dumb shit in a profile? If you have stupid negative filters, you only attract asshats that would put up with that kind of bullshit from a woman.


Based on your comments, RS, I should have found the right one by now. I think my profile is just fine..........

Love you red, always have.

Seriously thought, at a quick glance there are 3 very direct negative filters in your profile. Don't disrespect your reader's time or intellect by telling them what "you are not". Instead, ply them with what you are and what you offer. Telling someone what you are not is very, very insulting. You treat the men reading your profile like retarded little kids. A serious man would never respond positively to that. Think about it . . . I could write 7,000 pages about what I am not. What good does it do for the reader except give me a chance to insult the readers. Don't let your control issues scream out in your profile trying to teach men how to treat you by telling them what you are not.

Just sayin'



ETA: I stand by what I said concerning a well written profile. They work. Until you have one, you will not know.

< Message edited by ResidentSadist -- 12/30/2012 3:12:39 PM >


_____________________________

-=BDSM Book List=- Reading is Fundamental !!!
I give good thread.


(in reply to sexyred1)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Men hunt : women weed |Why it may be hard to find t... - 12/30/2012 4:43:38 PM   
littlewonder


Posts: 15659
Status: offline
I have to say, I agree with RS. Any negativity in a profile is just a real turn-off be it in a male or female profile. It's as though you think so little of yourself that you have to list what you are not instead of what you are. Let others see the positive traits in you. Let them see just how confident you feel about yourself.


_____________________________

Nothing has changed
Everything has changed

(in reply to ResidentSadist)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Men hunt : women weed |Why it may be hard to find t... - 12/30/2012 5:36:21 PM   
Pyramus


Posts: 397
Joined: 5/14/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Baroana
I can't believe the dumbness in this thread in the form of ignorance, flawed logic, bigotry, and sweeping generalizations.


You just have to think a bit harder ... then you'll understand.

(in reply to Baroana)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Men hunt : women weed |Why it may be hard to find t... - 12/30/2012 5:38:26 PM   
ARIES83


Posts: 3648
Status: offline


_____________________________

530 DAYS

(in reply to Pyramus)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Men hunt : women weed |Why it may be hard to find t... - 12/30/2012 5:58:51 PM   
pompeii


Posts: 934
Joined: 1/4/2007
From: Silicon Valley, San Jose, California
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: littlewonder
I have to say, I agree with RS. Any negativity in a profile is just a real turn-off be it in a male or female profile.


I haven't read the profile in question but I'm curious about this concept as the 'negativity' can be taken two different ways, only one of which I agree with.

1. The negativity can be a "downer" profile, e.g., one where the woman is just down on themselves or on specific aspects of THEIR life or person.
2. The negativity can be a filter, a sieve of sorts, where the woman says she doesn't want a man who is too "this" or too "that" (i.e., short, fat, old, married, jobless, druggy, whatever).

IMHO, both types would not have a place on, say, a resume were that woman to be applying for a job.

Likewise, I agree with littlewonder & ResidentSadist that there is as much place for the first type of negativity as there would be in a resume when applying for a job.

However, on the second case, given that men are a dime a dozen on Collarme (so it's less like looking for a job and more like filtering out the hoards of wannabe Doms), I wouldn't rule out a first-pass filter.

If "I" were a woman (but I'm decidedly not, so take this with a grain of a metal chloride), I would filter out losers using something like this at the end of my profile:
- No long distance relationship (local only, and, no, Kenya is not local to San Jose; Neither is Sacramento, nor Los Angeles).
- The right age range (and, no, you don't get to pick the year you graduated from high school as your birth date)
- The right height range (for the most part, women seem to want their men heel-height higher than they are, and above)
- Not married (and, no, separated but living with your wife doesn't count nor does it count if she no longer loves you)
- Own a job/home/car (renting is ok on the home & car ... any job is probably ok unless it's seasonal or under the table)
- No drugs whatsoever (and yes, 420 is a drug. Smoking will be considered a mark against you in some circumstances)
- No arrests whatsoever (traffic tickets are OK ... and maybe even a bit fun ... if they're done right and have a good story)
- College educated only (no need for JD or MD or PhD, just a BS is OK, but it has to be on sheepskin that you earned yourself)
- No body modifications whatsoever (ok, well, the one they did to that when you were a baby is actually a good one for looks - all others are out out out!)
- No guns whatsoever (just too dangerous - but dressing up in just chaps - and nothing else - would be fun - but not on the first date)
- No bad manners, bad teeth, bad breath, and poor sentence structure (shows a laziness of character ... bad taste is fine - maybe even preferred!)
- All the kinks you can think of are OK though (come to think of it, I just read a thread on all the kinks not yet done - we could try those)

DISCLAIMER: I have no idea what women do NOT want (I'm a guy, we're like dogs, we aren't generally all that choosy on the things above) - but this is my first-pass of what (I think) women would wish to FILTER out.

(in reply to littlewonder)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Men hunt : women weed |Why it may be hard to find t... - 12/30/2012 6:04:41 PM   
Baroana


Posts: 1480
Joined: 11/13/2011
Status: offline
Lolz!!!

(in reply to pompeii)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Men hunt : women weed |Why it may be hard to find t... - 12/30/2012 6:21:58 PM   
littlewonder


Posts: 15659
Status: offline
I figure out all those things simply by talking to the person. That actually is easier to me than putting it all on my profile.


_____________________________

Nothing has changed
Everything has changed

(in reply to Baroana)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Men hunt : women weed |Why it may be hard to find t... - 12/30/2012 7:22:00 PM   
sexyred1


Posts: 8998
Joined: 8/9/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist

quote:

ORIGINAL: sexyred1


quote:

ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist


quote:

ORIGINAL: Agent99


quote:

ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist
There is never an excuse to have anything negative (negative filters) in your profile. You only should use positive filters.


You're not a woman.

Even negative filters don't completely work for them.

For men though, it's good advice as they should aim as high as they can.

Otherwise, they fail.

I wrote profiles for women. If you present yourself sensually, honestly and elegantly, you automatically scare 90% of the turds away and the quality of your mail inquiries goes up.

Negative remarks are . . . well, would you dare talk that way to handsome successful dominant man you were attracted to in real life? Fuck no! Then why oh why would you do that dumb shit in a profile? If you have stupid negative filters, you only attract asshats that would put up with that kind of bullshit from a woman.


Based on your comments, RS, I should have found the right one by now. I think my profile is just fine..........

Love you red, always have.

Seriously thought, at a quick glance there are 3 very direct negative filters in your profile. Don't disrespect your reader's time or intellect by telling them what "you are not". Instead, ply them with what you are and what you offer. Telling someone what you are not is very, very insulting. You treat the men reading your profile like retarded little kids. A serious man would never respond positively to that. Think about it . . . I could write 7,000 pages about what I am not. What good does it do for the reader except give me a chance to insult the readers. Don't let your control issues scream out in your profile trying to teach men how to treat you by telling them what you are not.

Just sayin'



ETA: I stand by what I said concerning a well written profile. They work. Until you have one, you will not know.


Thanks for being constructive, RS. I think I I state what I "am not" simply to ward off the many, many questions of those things. Example: I am not nor ever will be poly or a switch, so why not state that?

Also, I have found men to be much more open about what they want in their profiles than on the phone for example. If you make it to a phone call, I find that most men are struggling to have a normal conversation because they really want to get to some "hot" talk. So, I like to pre-qualify in my profile specifics that are non negotiable about who I am and what I cannot compromise on.

But that is a good point to consider. Love you too!

< Message edited by sexyred1 -- 12/30/2012 7:27:41 PM >

(in reply to ResidentSadist)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Men hunt : women weed |Why it may be hard to find t... - 12/30/2012 7:49:38 PM   
seekingreality


Posts: 599
Joined: 8/11/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pyramus


In summary, with the huge number of male Dom/top profiles coupled with similarly compatible female sub/slave profiles, why do you think anyone would find it the least bit difficult to quickly locate a suitable kinky counterpart?



There are millions of men and women who have trouble finding a compatible partner for a vanilla relationship too, so this is hardly a BDSM only issue. However, BDSM adds another complicated factor, which makes a difficult search even more difficult.

(in reply to Pyramus)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Men hunt : women weed |Why it may be hard to find t... - 12/30/2012 8:19:27 PM   
ResidentSadist


Posts: 12580
Joined: 2/11/2007
From: a mean old Daddy, but I like you - Joni Mitchell
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: sexyred1

quote:

ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist

quote:

ORIGINAL: sexyred1


quote:

ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist


quote:

ORIGINAL: Agent99


quote:

ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist
There is never an excuse to have anything negative (negative filters) in your profile. You only should use positive filters.


You're not a woman.

Even negative filters don't completely work for them.

For men though, it's good advice as they should aim as high as they can.

Otherwise, they fail.

I wrote profiles for women. If you present yourself sensually, honestly and elegantly, you automatically scare 90% of the turds away and the quality of your mail inquiries goes up.

Negative remarks are . . . well, would you dare talk that way to handsome successful dominant man you were attracted to in real life? Fuck no! Then why oh why would you do that dumb shit in a profile? If you have stupid negative filters, you only attract asshats that would put up with that kind of bullshit from a woman.


Based on your comments, RS, I should have found the right one by now. I think my profile is just fine..........

Love you red, always have.

Seriously thought, at a quick glance there are 3 very direct negative filters in your profile. Don't disrespect your reader's time or intellect by telling them what "you are not". Instead, ply them with what you are and what you offer. Telling someone what you are not is very, very insulting. You treat the men reading your profile like retarded little kids. A serious man would never respond positively to that. Think about it . . . I could write 7,000 pages about what I am not. What good does it do for the reader except give me a chance to insult the readers. Don't let your control issues scream out in your profile trying to teach men how to treat you by telling them what you are not.

Just sayin'



ETA: I stand by what I said concerning a well written profile. They work. Until you have one, you will not know.


Thanks for being constructive, RS. I think I I state what I "am not" simply to ward off the many, many questions of those things. Example: I am not nor ever will be poly or a switch, so why not state that?

Also, I have found men to be much more open about what they want in their profiles than on the phone for example. If you make it to a phone call, I find that most men are struggling to have a normal conversation because they really want to get to some "hot" talk. So, I like to pre-qualify in my profile specifics that are non negotiable about who I am and what I cannot compromise on.

But that is a good point to consider. Love you too!

I understand all that. Why not say you are monogamous instead of saying you are not poly? That is two whole different attitudes in conveying information about yourself and it treats the reader with more respect. It gives them the power, the chance to choose those things you are. Otherwise you have the power by declaring what you are not. Empower your male readers from a submissive standpoint instead limiting them from a tutorial position.

I certainly understand your point about phones though. Give a man a sexy red head, a telephone and he'll struggle to put his foot in his mouth every time.

_____________________________

-=BDSM Book List=- Reading is Fundamental !!!
I give good thread.


(in reply to sexyred1)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Men hunt : women weed |Why it may be hard to find t... - 12/30/2012 9:55:10 PM   
anaturalsubmiss


Posts: 49
Joined: 12/26/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist
I wrote profiles for women. If you present yourself sensually, honestly and elegantly, you automatically scare 90% of the turds away and the quality of your mail inquiries goes up.


Trust me, you could write the "perfect" profile for the perfect man, and a similarly perfect profile for the perfect woman, and the results (counted purely by number of respondents per hour or some other volume metric) would so far outweigh that of the man as to make you shudder.

Then, try this.

Write the perfect man again, but this time, compare it to a basic regular woman - or - get this - even a woman with nothing but the basic statistics (any statistics mind you) in her profile - but NOTHING at all in the profile.

Guess what?

The number of respondents per hour (or some other volume metric) would so far outweigh that of the man as to make any comparison of the contents meaningless.

(in reply to ResidentSadist)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Men hunt : women weed |Why it may be hard to find t... - 12/31/2012 12:48:03 AM   
plesto


Posts: 49
Joined: 7/2/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: pompeii

I haven't read the profile in question but I'm curious about this concept as the 'negativity' can be taken two different ways, only one of which I agree with.

1. The negativity can be a "downer" profile, e.g., one where the woman is just down on themselves or on specific aspects of THEIR life or person.
2. The negativity can be a filter, a sieve of sorts, where the woman says she doesn't want a man who is too "this" or too "that" (i.e., short, fat, old, married, jobless, druggy, whatever).

IMHO, both types would not have a place on, say, a resume were that woman to be applying for a job.

Likewise, I agree with littlewonder & ResidentSadist that there is as much place for the first type of negativity as there would be in a resume when applying for a job.

However, on the second case, given that men are a dime a dozen on Collarme (so it's less like looking for a job and more like filtering out the hoards of wannabe Doms), I wouldn't rule out a first-pass filter.

If "I" were a woman (but I'm decidedly not, so take this with a grain of a metal chloride), I would filter out losers using something like this at the end of my profile:
- No long distance relationship (local only, and, no, Kenya is not local to San Jose; Neither is Sacramento, nor Los Angeles).
- The right age range (and, no, you don't get to pick the year you graduated from high school as your birth date)
- The right height range (for the most part, women seem to want their men heel-height higher than they are, and above)
- Not married (and, no, separated but living with your wife doesn't count nor does it count if she no longer loves you)
- Own a job/home/car (renting is ok on the home & car ... any job is probably ok unless it's seasonal or under the table)
- No drugs whatsoever (and yes, 420 is a drug. Smoking will be considered a mark against you in some circumstances)
- No arrests whatsoever (traffic tickets are OK ... and maybe even a bit fun ... if they're done right and have a good story)
- College educated only (no need for JD or MD or PhD, just a BS is OK, but it has to be on sheepskin that you earned yourself)
- No body modifications whatsoever (ok, well, the one they did to that when you were a baby is actually a good one for looks - all others are out out out!)
- No guns whatsoever (just too dangerous - but dressing up in just chaps - and nothing else - would be fun - but not on the first date)
- No bad manners, bad teeth, bad breath, and poor sentence structure (shows a laziness of character ... bad taste is fine - maybe even preferred!)
- All the kinks you can think of are OK though (come to think of it, I just read a thread on all the kinks not yet done - we could try those)

DISCLAIMER: I have no idea what women do NOT want (I'm a guy, we're like dogs, we aren't generally all that choosy on the things above) - but this is my first-pass of what (I think) women would wish to FILTER out.

quote:


There are millions of men and women who have trouble finding a compatible partner for a vanilla relationship too, so this is hardly a BDSM only issue. However, BDSM adds another complicated factor, which makes a difficult search even more difficult.


When I see lists like that now that I generally scroll back up the page and click the hide button. Even if the rest of the profile has interested me and I match the criteria set out, I will still hide that profile.

(in reply to pompeii)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Men hunt : women weed |Why it may be hard to find t... - 12/31/2012 12:51:11 AM   
littlewonder


Posts: 15659
Status: offline
Same here. If Master had a list I would not have taken him seriously whatsoever, even just for a casual chat. When I see lists it usually strikes me as the person having been burnt many, many times and now they are a bit jaded and bitter yet and a bit gun shy. To me those would traits would tell me they are not ready for a relationship right now. They are still hurting and have no comes to terms yet with their issues.


_____________________________

Nothing has changed
Everything has changed

(in reply to plesto)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Men hunt : women weed |Why it may be hard to find t... - 12/31/2012 1:03:33 AM   
Pyramus


Posts: 397
Joined: 5/14/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: plesto
When I see lists like that now that I generally scroll back up the page and click the hide button.


Heh heh... that's exactly the point!

(in reply to plesto)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Men hunt : women weed |Why it may be hard to find t... - 12/31/2012 1:25:49 AM   
ResidentSadist


Posts: 12580
Joined: 2/11/2007
From: a mean old Daddy, but I like you - Joni Mitchell
Status: offline
Taking pompeii's huge negative filter list and looking at it from plesto and littlewonder's perspectives, you can see how everyone has limit to the negative input you can jam in their face before they discredit the source. So why risk it? Negative filters speak poorly about the writer. For example:

pompeii says "No long distance relationship" "No arrests" "No bad manners" etc.
Seriously, are you talking to a child? It sounds like it. Only people that will tolerate being talked to like that will communicate with you. That is awful.

Instead say, "seeking polite local law biding" . . . that is informative and respectful of your profile reader.

Really folks, there is no excuse for a bad attitude and negative filters in your personal ad. Pretend you are writing a product ad. Would you say "Cadillac, not for poor people because it is the king of the gas guzzlers" or "Pintos, no for the safety minded! But hey, they don't explode that often".

_____________________________

-=BDSM Book List=- Reading is Fundamental !!!
I give good thread.


(in reply to Pyramus)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Men hunt : women weed |Why it may be hard to find t... - 12/31/2012 3:18:11 AM   
lovethyself


Posts: 1818
Joined: 11/4/2012
Status: offline
-FR-

I'm relatively new here, and this is also my first online bdsm forum, so I didn't really know what I was getting into when I wrote my profile. I tried to be honest and candid, and did get some good comments and feedback at the beginning. I found, though, that I needed to add something to help me weed out the vast number of messages that I got in the beginning, since I was trying to be polite and answer most of the messages I got. I added a journal entry stating that if the person didn't have something in their message that proved to me that they had actually read my profile (like mentioning one of my likes), then I would not respond. Since then, it's been much easier to filter out the copy and paste type messages. Ive even met someone from cm, and we are now together, though it's still just the beginning.

I think RS has it right. There are many different ways to say the same thing, and each different way has a slightly different feel to it, and can evoke a different response in others. My mom was a guidance councillor, and she taught me about how to confront someone about an issue without making it feel like an attack on them. "I felt..... " comes out very differently than "You made me feel....." and yet, you are saying the same thing in the end. The same can be said for how you put yourself out there in a profile, or anything else for that matter.

As for the OP, as a woman, I can say that when I first created my profile, I did get a huge number of messages from (mostly) guys. It has started to taper down now, but I haven't searched through the male Dom profiles at all. The only profiles that I've looked at were of those guys that messaged me and had piqued my interest. There just wasn't enough time in the day to go looking as well. I was fortunate in that I found someone out of that rash of messages, so I don't need to go hunting. But who knows. If it doesn't work out, I may be starting a hunt of my own. This is just my perspective, and I'm sure that there are others out there with vastly different experiences.

OP, thank you for starting a discussion about this that wasn't just bitching. It's so nice to have intelligent discussions without it turning into name calling.

(in reply to ResidentSadist)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Men hunt : women weed |Why it may be hard to find the perfect counterpart Dom/top or sub/slave on CM Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125