DomKen
Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam
quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen
quote:
ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam
quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen
Go back and read my posts. You're simply lying when you claim I don't know what a bullet is and that I said anything was higher velocity.
We're also not talking about custom powder loads but about standard cartridges. Stop trying to put words into my mouth.
I read your posts and they are not ballistically or factually correct.
I was simply tring to teach. I was attempting to give you information that is not available in the popular media because most of the media mavens are, to put it blunt, totally ignorant.
A smaller gun or cartrige is NOT more or less powerful.
It is the Bullet, the velocity and the accuracy that counts.
A smaller firearm was developed so it is easier to cary long distances. That's IT
I was factually correct in every statement I made. You've repeatedly tried to add/change my words to make them fit your strawman attacks.
For instance I never wrote anything about the comparative power of any firearm.
You are not trying to teach. You have shown that you are the average gun liar with next to no knowledge of firearms and their history. You continued to blather about custom loads when it was clear the discussion was about standard cartridges.
Now go back and read what I wrote and see if you can not insert anything and come up with the strawmen you've been flailing at so badly.
You were not factually correct. In post 57, you said
"Assault rifles were developed from the experiences in WWII. They are shorter and lighter rifles that fire a smaller but high velocity cartridge than the roughly .30 caliber hunting rifle rounds fired by battle rifles of the era."
That is incorrect. the first one was a Russian weapon issued in 1915
bullshit.
The first weapon that can be called an assault rifle is the StG 44 produced in 1944.
quote:
You also said " Since you are unaware high velcoity when talking about ammunition is a technical term with a specific meaning (supersonic muzzle velocity)." and I pointed out that virtually every modern cartrige used is "High Velocity".
True but it is a factor since I was discussing cut down cartridges..
quote:
You claimed that "The round used in the AK-47 is significantly shorter than any .30 hunting cartridge. "
Ok but does that MATTER? A shorter cartrige can have superior ballistics to a longer cartrige and vice versa.
What I said is true. I never made the claim you are trying to put in my mouth.
quote:
Here's another of your posts "The AK-47 fires a short .30 (39mm compared to the 51mm used in NATO standard battle rifles.) which is high velocity and short ranged just like the 5.56mm round used in the AR-15. Both cartridges are specific and exclusive to assault rifles. The AK-74 fires a 5.45 X 39mm cartridge,"
Again, you are showing you don't know the difference between the bullet and the cartrige.
What? I never mention bullet anywhere in that quote. Do you know how to tell when I'm talking about a bullet? I'll mention the weight of the bullet (in grains or grams).
quote:
Now, I have shown several of your posts that are untrue or demonstrate that you have no knowledge of firearms and ballistics.
Feel to do the same to my posts on the subject
Go ahead., MAKE MY FUCKIN DAY AND CALL ME A LIAR
You have lied in this post twice. Now go take some firearms classes so you are less of a spectacular no nothing about the subject.
|
RE: What do flah suppressors have to do with crime control - 
Profile
I went a couple of rounds with him over the same shit in the "Executive Orders" thread, then trying to tell me that you don't know anything about ballistics. Same shit, different thread. Oh yeah, I'm a liar too.
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread