Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Guns


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Guns Page: <<   < prev  17 18 [19] 20 21   next >   >>
[Poll]

Guns


There is too much regulation already.
  10% (28)
There should be far more stringent background checks.
  15% (39)
Reinstate the ban on assault guns.
  11% (29)
Make conceal and carry the law in all 50 states.
  10% (28)
Make gun classes mandatory.
  16% (42)
The only guns availible to the public should be hunting rifles.
  4% (12)
The 2nd amendment includes individuals owning firearms.
  21% (54)
The 2nd amendment does not include individuals, it's been distorted.
  3% (8)
I wish my country had gun laws similar to the US
  0% (1)
I don't want my country to have gun laws like the US
  6% (16)


Total Votes : 257


(last vote on : 2/2/2013 9:53:19 PM)
(Poll will run till: -- )
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Guns - 1/29/2013 4:05:52 AM   
Focus50


Posts: 3962
Joined: 12/28/2004
From: Newcastle, Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

So, you can't have a preventive type solution until after the security's been breached once? How are you going to ascertain "violent intent?"

The devil's always in the detail, I'm merely making a few suggestions for *discussion*, something pretty much all US pro-gunners here avoid like the plague.

But to answer your question, I'd think the violence mentioned in the Police report would be an excellent way to ascertain violent intent. I was merely trying to separate a burglar from, say, an overt home invasion. Dunno about there, but the average burglar here runs for it when sprung; they're mostly not violent.

I think you at least are capable of seeing I'm not trying to write law here, yes?



quote:

Yes, there are. You just won't accept that truth.

If by the truth, you mean gun classes and background checks, then no, *that's* passive and does nothing to address the proliferation of weapons and the means and opportunity that provides to criminals or those who simply shouldn't be messing with guns (kids etc).


quote:

What does it matter if he has 100 guns? He has different guns for different forms of vermin. That's actually planning.

It perpetuates a rabid, out of control gun culture. It ain't criminals wholly responsible for 30,000 annual gun deaths, is it? Or psycho's.... For memory (from the link in the other gun thread), of 231 gun deaths in Australia in 2010, only about 16 occurred during a criminal activity.

Focus.


_____________________________

Never underestimate the persuasive power of stupid people in large groups. <unknown>

Your food is for eating, not torturing. <my mum> (Errm, when I was a kid)

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 361
RE: Guns - 1/29/2013 4:17:02 AM   
Focus50


Posts: 3962
Joined: 12/28/2004
From: Newcastle, Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Focus50

Thirty thousand annual gun deaths...

You are either misinformed or making shit up. In the United States, the total for murders and non-negligent homicides by any means is less than half that, and the numbers for both homicide and violent crime in general have been trending downward since 1992 while rates of gun ownership and concealed carry have increased.

FBI Uniform Crime Reports


For the sake of argument, let's just agree I'm "making shit up".

Cos clearly you don't count (eg) fatal accidents or suicides by gun as actually being gun deaths....

Imagine my surprise....

Focus.


_____________________________

Never underestimate the persuasive power of stupid people in large groups. <unknown>

Your food is for eating, not torturing. <my mum> (Errm, when I was a kid)

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 362
RE: Guns - 1/29/2013 4:29:05 AM   
Focus50


Posts: 3962
Joined: 12/28/2004
From: Newcastle, Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

A dealers license means you can sell guns


I'd think trade in guns, ie buy & sell.

It's the only option you have in Oz to possess more than 'X' amount of guns (not sure of the statute but more than my 3).

And by "dealer's licence", you better believe the mountain of scrutiny & documentation you have to keep up with....

It's late; this far and no further....

Focus.


_____________________________

Never underestimate the persuasive power of stupid people in large groups. <unknown>

Your food is for eating, not torturing. <my mum> (Errm, when I was a kid)

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 363
RE: Guns - 1/29/2013 4:41:00 AM   
Focus50


Posts: 3962
Joined: 12/28/2004
From: Newcastle, Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

And it is an M1A, not an M14. I suggest you learn the difference between firearms before you get back to telling the US how to set up gun laws.


Oops; missed this one - but definitely the last for tonight....

You're likely right and I apologise for not having total recall of everything you've posted. Errrm, was it even in this thread or something on about page 40 of the other thread, some 3 weeks back?

Nonetheless, what kinda fool mistakes M14 for M1A - chalk n cheese on screen! Bad photographic memory, BAD...!

Nite all....

Focus.


_____________________________

Never underestimate the persuasive power of stupid people in large groups. <unknown>

Your food is for eating, not torturing. <my mum> (Errm, when I was a kid)

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 364
RE: Guns - 1/29/2013 5:03:55 AM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline
An M14 is a select fire weapon capable of full auto fire, an M1A is not.

Here you are complaining about the guns I have, and you have no clue as to why I have them.

I suggest you go after a pack of wild hogs with a bolt action or semi auto with five rounds.

By the way, the M1A is for sentimental value, it is the civilian version of the M14, which was what the first sniper rifle I was issued. I have it set up the same way.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 365
RE: Guns - 1/29/2013 5:05:39 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Powergamz1

Do you have anything other than fraudulently pretending that I *didn't* provide factual links, and then making up a bunch of nonsense that I never wrote?

You know as well as I do that I never wrote 'deaths in every county', I asserted that todays hunters are nowhere near the skill level of a lone frontiersman from 200 years ago, and that they too often shoot things besides their intended game, every year.




quote:

ORIGINAL: Powergamz1

First, in all parts of this country, the main source of food is drive-throughs. A hunter going out alone as part of regular chores, and stocking the larder hasn't been the norm for a while.

Second, if the overwhelming majority of 'hunters' could find their ass with both hands, the aisles at WalMart/Kmart/BassPro and every local outdoor sports shop wouldn't be piled high with 50 lb bags of corn, timed deer feeders, trail-cams, tree-stands, and 4XL camo. There wouldn't be hunter shootings in every rural county in the US during hunting season. Alcohol sales wouldn't spike on the way to hunt camps. Deer population wouldn't be at disease spreading levels.
And the military wouldn't have such an abysmal rate of 'good ole boys' needing to be taught how to hit a target without a scope.


As long as you are peddling tired old fantasies, got any bridges?





_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to Powergamz1)
Profile   Post #: 366
RE: Guns - 1/29/2013 5:11:19 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Focus50
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
So, you can't have a preventive type solution until after the security's been breached once? How are you going to ascertain "violent intent?"

The devil's always in the detail, I'm merely making a few suggestions for *discussion*, something pretty much all US pro-gunners here avoid like the plague.
But to answer your question, I'd think the violence mentioned in the Police report would be an excellent way to ascertain violent intent. I was merely trying to separate a burglar from, say, an overt home invasion. Dunno about there, but the average burglar here runs for it when sprung; they're mostly not violent.
I think you at least are capable of seeing I'm not trying to write law here, yes?


I am not the one that accused you of trying to write laws. Again, you're assuming the details of the average Aussie burglar are the same as the average American burglar. I'm not saying you're wrong (because I don't know), but I can't say you're right, either.

I still take issue with not being allowed a permit to own a gun until after a home invasion, with violent intent. If a lock was picked and the perp scared away, how would you know violent intent?

quote:

quote:

Yes, there are. You just won't accept that truth.

If by the truth, you mean gun classes and background checks, then no, *that's* passive and does nothing to address the proliferation of weapons and the means and opportunity that provides to criminals or those who simply shouldn't be messing with guns (kids etc).


And, here I am, discussing this with you, accepting that there should be requirements on gun security, and only having an issue (which was my only original issue with requiring gun security) in what level of security is going to be required. Reasonable leaves too much space for abuse. You've already stated that the Aussie rules were knee-jerk and over the top. I'm not questioning that, but does the Aussie Government have a history of increasing regulation once it's in the books? The US does, and I even gave examples.

Then, you take Tazzy, who is a gun owner and a huntress. I assume you could consider her a "pro-gunner." She's all about requiring secure storage of firearms being required. So, right here, on this board, you have two people who are pro-gun, that are willing to talk about and support (if not push for) regulations that go further than background checks and gun classes.

quote:

quote:

What does it matter if he has 100 guns? He has different guns for different forms of vermin. That's actually planning.

It perpetuates a rabid, out of control gun culture. It ain't criminals wholly responsible for 30,000 annual gun deaths, is it? Or psycho's.... For memory (from the link in the other gun thread), of 231 gun deaths in Australia in 2010, only about 16 occurred during a criminal activity.
Focus.


It does not perpetuate shit, except the the misguided stereotype of an American gun owner. Of that 30k+ gun deaths, 2/3 are suicides. Without putting words into your mouth, are you more worried about the deaths, or the tool that caused the death? Is it better to have 20k+ knife suicides vs. 20k+ firearm suicides? Typically, people who commit suicide aren't driven so much by the tool, but by the situation that has put them into the frame of mind to commit suicide.




_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Focus50)
Profile   Post #: 367
RE: Guns - 1/29/2013 7:17:07 AM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline
From what I can tell, the British and Aussie attitude of "It works for us, and therefore it will work for everyone" is a major problem with discussing a uniquely American problem with them.

They propose extreme solutions to a problem where a middle ground can be found. Their solutions seem to imply that gun owners, with legal weapons, who follow the laws of the land are the ones doing all the killing of other people.

The suggestions of raids to clean up the criminal gun owners neglect to take into consideration the fourth amendment.

They also fail to take into account that there are vast areas of this country with various predators and pest animals, some of which were introduced to this country by European colonists, not just the brits.

Add to that they seem to think that Americans buy firearms for the sake of buying firearms, ignoring the fact some collect firearms, and some people like myself have a specific use for each weapon I own, so each may be based on the same design, but they are set up differently. Just like hammers, there are different hammers for different uses, same basic tool, but variations on purpose.

For deer I use a one of the bolt actions 308's depending on the area I am hunting or if I plan on using a stand or blind. For wild hogs, each AR I own is suited for each type of conditions I may encounter during the hunt, heavy brush, open pasture, broken terrain or in the canyons and around what the locals refer to as mountains, or the size of the hogs, I have recently gotten a special order AR based rifle that is suited for dealing with the bigger boars we have around here.

And I have one AR based rifle that is what I prefer to use in hunting coyotes.

In a nutshell, the AR based rifle is easy to configure for various situations and terrain, unlike a bolt action.

England has a few thousand years of settlement by humans, during that time, most if not all large predators that may have been native to the country have been eliminated. They dont seem to grasp that the US is a continent spanning country with various types of wildlife ranging from large predators such as wolves or cougars, and the large omnivores like bears. We have a variety of game animals of various sizes ranging from the medium sized deer in the south west, antelope, elk, moose, caribou, moose, big horn sheep, mountain goats. We also have a variety of pest animals, coyotes being the most prolific and the biggest problem.

There is no universal firearm solution for dealing with the varied wildlife in this country, and those people who claim there is and it is either a bolt action, lever action or a shotgun, are wrong. And as anyone who knows firearms knows the barrel of a shot gun is not normally rifled, so a slug fired from a shotgun is not as accurate as a rifle bullet although you can buy rifled shotgun barrels.

Of course I have suggested that the US provide bears, wolves and cougars to the British in significant numbers to provide the British with a large enough breeding population of each in order to give the rural citizens of that country a bit of excitement. And the introduction of large predators would help contain their own wild pig problems.

Now on another point the brits and aussies have constantly brought up, suicide by gun is not considered a violent crime in the US because the act is self inflicted, there for the Department of Justice does not add that into crime figures

Would you have us count suicide by intentional overdose as part of the problem with prescription drug abuse? Would suicide by carbon monoxide poisoning be considered an automobile accident? Is a suicide by turning on the gas in a oven considered a home accident? Suicide by hanging oneself, is that a death by strangulation and thus considered a violent crime?

The gun debate started because of a criminal act, lets stick to that, and not try to drag in unrelated uses of a gun in the killing of oneself.

The only thing that connects the two is the use of a gun, and not even the same type of gun.

However, looking at comparative statistics, which seems to be the preferred tactic used against Americans, might I suggest the UK put restrictions on the purchase of rope, and the UK might want to consider banning alcohol. The UK has a very high rate of suicide by hanging, and compared to the States, the UK definitely has a drinking problem.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 368
RE: Guns - 1/29/2013 10:16:36 AM   
VideoAdminChi


Posts: 3086
Joined: 8/6/2012
Status: offline
FR,

I removed a personal attack and a string of replies, some of which included links. Feel free to write to ask for your content back.

Please return to the topic and do not make other posters the topic.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 369
RE: Guns - 1/29/2013 10:25:08 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Focus50

Reigning in assault rifles is not about their contributions to the crime/death toll...

QFT

quote:

ORIGINAL: Focus50

America's culture of murderous gun lust

Nobody who posts crap like this is qualified to lecture anyone about "paranoia".

K.


< Message edited by Kirata -- 1/29/2013 10:29:29 AM >

(in reply to Focus50)
Profile   Post #: 370
RE: Guns - 1/29/2013 10:35:25 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Focus50

Cos clearly you don't count (eg) fatal accidents or suicides by gun as actually being gun deaths....

I thought the concern here was violent crime, or as you put it "America's culture of murderous gun lust." The inclusion of accidents and suicides seems gratuitous in that context. But, of course, I misjudged your motives, and for that I apologize.

K.

(in reply to Focus50)
Profile   Post #: 371
RE: Guns - 1/29/2013 11:17:25 AM   
Nosathro


Posts: 3319
Joined: 9/25/2005
From: Orange County, California
Status: offline
I think we do have a Gun Culture

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-cesca/breaking-the-american-gun_b_2348282.html

You know it just occured to me if God wanted man to have guns, he would have given an M-16 to Cain.

< Message edited by Nosathro -- 1/29/2013 11:23:52 AM >

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 372
RE: Guns - 1/29/2013 11:58:15 AM   
Yachtie


Posts: 3593
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

I think we do have a Gun Culture

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-cesca/breaking-the-american-gun_b_2348282.html

You know it just occured to me if God wanted man to have guns, he would have given an M-16 to Cain.


In that respect He made Colonel Colt. Now you might argue with His timing but you couldn't His motive.

_____________________________

“We all know it’s going to end badly, but in the meantime we can make some money.” - Jim Cramer, CNBC

“Those who ‘abjure’ violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf.” - George Orwell

(in reply to Nosathro)
Profile   Post #: 373
RE: Guns - 1/29/2013 11:58:38 AM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

From what I can tell, the British and Aussie attitude of "It works for us, and therefore it will work for everyone" is a major problem with discussing a uniquely American problem with them.

They propose extreme solutions to a problem where a middle ground can be found. Their solutions seem to imply that gun owners, with legal weapons, who follow the laws of the land are the ones doing all the killing of other people.

The suggestions of raids to clean up the criminal gun owners neglect to take into consideration the fourth amendment.

They also fail to take into account that there are vast areas of this country with various predators and pest animals, some of which were introduced to this country by European colonists, not just the brits.

Add to that they seem to think that Americans buy firearms for the sake of buying firearms, ignoring the fact some collect firearms, and some people like myself have a specific use for each weapon I own, so each may be based on the same design, but they are set up differently. Just like hammers, there are different hammers for different uses, same basic tool, but variations on purpose.

For deer I use a one of the bolt actions 308's depending on the area I am hunting or if I plan on using a stand or blind. For wild hogs, each AR I own is suited for each type of conditions I may encounter during the hunt, heavy brush, open pasture, broken terrain or in the canyons and around what the locals refer to as mountains, or the size of the hogs, I have recently gotten a special order AR based rifle that is suited for dealing with the bigger boars we have around here.

And I have one AR based rifle that is what I prefer to use in hunting coyotes.

In a nutshell, the AR based rifle is easy to configure for various situations and terrain, unlike a bolt action.

England has a few thousand years of settlement by humans, during that time, most if not all large predators that may have been native to the country have been eliminated. They dont seem to grasp that the US is a continent spanning country with various types of wildlife ranging from large predators such as wolves or cougars, and the large omnivores like bears. We have a variety of game animals of various sizes ranging from the medium sized deer in the south west, antelope, elk, moose, caribou, moose, big horn sheep, mountain goats. We also have a variety of pest animals, coyotes being the most prolific and the biggest problem.

There is no universal firearm solution for dealing with the varied wildlife in this country, and those people who claim there is and it is either a bolt action, lever action or a shotgun, are wrong. And as anyone who knows firearms knows the barrel of a shot gun is not normally rifled, so a slug fired from a shotgun is not as accurate as a rifle bullet although you can buy rifled shotgun barrels.

Of course I have suggested that the US provide bears, wolves and cougars to the British in significant numbers to provide the British with a large enough breeding population of each in order to give the rural citizens of that country a bit of excitement. And the introduction of large predators would help contain their own wild pig problems.

Now on another point the brits and aussies have constantly brought up, suicide by gun is not considered a violent crime in the US because the act is self inflicted, there for the Department of Justice does not add that into crime figures

Would you have us count suicide by intentional overdose as part of the problem with prescription drug abuse? Would suicide by carbon monoxide poisoning be considered an automobile accident? Is a suicide by turning on the gas in a oven considered a home accident? Suicide by hanging oneself, is that a death by strangulation and thus considered a violent crime?

The gun debate started because of a criminal act, lets stick to that, and not try to drag in unrelated uses of a gun in the killing of oneself.

The only thing that connects the two is the use of a gun, and not even the same type of gun.

However, looking at comparative statistics, which seems to be the preferred tactic used against Americans, might I suggest the UK put restrictions on the purchase of rope, and the UK might want to consider banning alcohol. The UK has a very high rate of suicide by hanging, and compared to the States, the UK definitely has a drinking problem.


You seem to be trying to get further away from the OP with each post. Not many people have suggested banning all guns, just the AR15 types, which like it or not, have been responsible for the last five mass murders.

Your knowledge of the UK also seems pretty slim. You are also making generalisations about all British posters. Many of us have said we see the point about animals and self defense, so lets stop playing games and comment on what people have actually posted.


(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 374
RE: Guns - 1/29/2013 12:09:10 PM   
Yachtie


Posts: 3593
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

You seem to be trying to get further away from the OP with each post. Not many people have suggested banning all guns, just the AR15 types, which like it or not, have been responsible for the last five mass murders.



The last five mass murders pale in numbers in comparison to what happens everyday. Given that, and by the numbers, wouldn't it better to ban all but the AR-15 type?

It's not that anti-gun logic-fu is so weak, it's transparent.


_____________________________

“We all know it’s going to end badly, but in the meantime we can make some money.” - Jim Cramer, CNBC

“Those who ‘abjure’ violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf.” - George Orwell

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 375
RE: Guns - 1/29/2013 12:39:04 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

K, just accept the obvious, the brits, and by extension of common heritage, the Aussies still feel like they can dictate law and domestic policy inside the US...

I think some of them have actually forgotten who won the Revolutionary War.


Pssstttttttt Debate isnt the same as dictating.

And I havent forgotten who won the Revolutionary War, it was those pesky French.

The French even lost their own revolution when it was sucsessful

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 376
RE: Guns - 1/29/2013 12:41:06 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Focus50


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

A dealers license means you can sell guns


I'd think trade in guns, ie buy & sell.

It's the only option you have in Oz to possess more than 'X' amount of guns (not sure of the statute but more than my 3).

And by "dealer's licence", you better believe the mountain of scrutiny & documentation you have to keep up with....

It's late; this far and no further....

Focus.


You would think wrong

(in reply to Focus50)
Profile   Post #: 377
RE: Guns - 1/29/2013 12:53:18 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

You seem to be trying to get further away from the OP with each post. Not many people have suggested banning all guns, just the AR15 types, which like it or not, have been responsible for the last five mass murders.

The Feinstein bill goes way beyond that, but let's move on. The AR's have been responsible? Not the shooters? Seriously? AR-form rifles are arguably the most popular semi-automatic civilian rifle design on the market today, so their occasional illegitimate use is hardly a surprising finding. Overall, however, rifles are the firearm least favored for murder. Fully 72 percent of firearm homicides are committed with pistols; only 3.7 percent wirh rifles of any kind.

K.

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 378
RE: Guns - 1/29/2013 1:01:13 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

I think we do have a Gun Culture

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-cesca/breaking-the-american-gun_b_2348282.html

You know it just occured to me if God wanted man to have guns, he would have given an M-16 to Cain.



By that logic, if God would have wanted ships to have engines, he would have told Noah how to build a wood fired steam engine, If he wanted man to fly, he would have given us wings.

The same can be said for bows, spears, sling shots, and every other fucking weapon ever developed.

It just occurred to me, there is a fundamental biological difference in pro gun people and anti gun extremists. The anti gun extremist only uses his or her brain to keep their ears apart, and their head as a hat rack.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to Nosathro)
Profile   Post #: 379
RE: Guns - 1/29/2013 1:13:49 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961
It just occurred to me, there is a fundamental biological difference in pro gun people and anti gun extremists. The anti gun extremist only uses his or her brain to keep their ears apart, and their head as a hat rack.


I highlighted the rhetorical trick of using the word 'extremist' elsewhere, JLF, by using it myself. (I was even on the point of abbreviating 'gun liberation extremist' to GLE - for some reason, that has an even more marked effect.) It has the underhand effect of making oneself and one's own argument feel comfy and balanced, while making that of the opposition sound inherently looney.

(How many nuclear bombs do you want to fall on the USA? All of them, a moderate number, or none at all? Congratulations, if you favour the last - you're an extremist! )

To get things in proportion: from the point of view of the vast majority of anglophones *other* than Americans, the gun situation in the USA now is already extreme. In that much wider context, you are one of the extremists, not one of the moderates. Just saying.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 380
Page:   <<   < prev  17 18 [19] 20 21   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Guns Page: <<   < prev  17 18 [19] 20 21   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125