tazzygirl
Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
We all have desires but we curtail them out of respect and dignity, not only for ourselves but others. Saying they like it to happen an I like doing it, is not a reason to do something. Just because you can doesn't mean you should. Freedom of choice? Hmm And I dont care if you dont like me taking part of your post... deal with it. There are people who like anal.... not for me... There are people who like blood... not for me... There are people who like golden showers... not for me There are people who enjoy rape fantasies... not for me There are adrenaline junkies.... not my kink quote:
I spoke to one sub and what she was saying seemed nuts, she had fantasies about being raped, to me the feelings of a victim who has no inclination towards any of the effects or emotions, and the feelings that a fantasist associates with it can never be equated, which is not to say the reality of rape is any less of a vile act if happened to either. I think some people don't differentiate between reality and fantasy and are damaged by it. Would any of you think that it would be ok for a masochist person to make a choice to put themselves in dangerous situations with a hope to actually being raped, based on their fantasy and the perceived feelings they will get from it? These types of fantasies are actually quite common. Sometimes, a fantasy is only that and never meant to be more. quote:
ORIGINAL: con8ken Only if the person is delusional about the reality of rape will the two be equated in fantasy What are your professional qualifications to make the above medical diagnosis? quote:
The main point is, do you believe that the masochist in the scenario I set, that being actively seeking to raped for real, needs protecting from herself. So now you want to play the white knight role and rush in to rescue her? She is an adult. She is making decisions you dont agree with. quote:
The original question is as it is there as I copied and pasted it Whether you are actively seeking or not doesnt negate the questions. And if you read it the questions aren't the point. The point is some people need protecting from themselves. I agree, some people do need protecting from themselves. Are you qualified to determine who does and who does not? From what I am reading here, I would say no. quote:
This sub I spoke to actually said by a stranger in the legal definition of the word. I have no trouble making the distinction. She said it would be the ultimate for her, and if it were to happen her it wouldn't cause her to become damaged an stress about it. She knew the distinction between the two, I asked her if she did and she explained. She said, she purposefully walks down dark alleys and deserted streets, roads/places at night sometimes, hoping someone will attack her. I was taken aback by this and thought, she's nuts her. And, on page 6, post 110 of your thread, you finally get to the meat of the matter. Unless you have proof she is a danger to herself, there isnt anything you can do. Many people choose to do risky behaviors. Ever seen a glory hole? And, I really have to ask you.... Why are you ignoring LadyPact's posts? What she has posted has been full of information for you.
_____________________________
Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt. RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11 Duchess of Dissent 1 Dont judge me because I sin differently than you. If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.
|