RE: Feinstein's Bill (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


jlf1961 -> RE: Feinstein's Bill (1/25/2013 6:12:15 PM)

quote:

Government statistics for the year 2010[15] records 40 homicides involving firearms, out of the 53 cases of homicide in 2010.

The annual rate of homicide by any means per 100,000 population was 0.70.[16] The annual rate of homicide by guns per 100,000 population was 0.52.[17]
source


Now what part of the large number of guns in private hands vs. gun crime has been disproved?




tazzygirl -> RE: Feinstein's Bill (1/25/2013 7:52:12 PM)

Switzerland. 2011. ‘Violent Infractions: Elucidations and Evolution of Infractions (Infractions de violence: Elucidations et Evolution des Infractions).’ Police Statistics on Crime Annual Report 2010 (Statistique Policière de la Criminalité Rapport Annuel 2010), p. 32. Neuchâtel: Office Fédéral de la Statistique / Département Fédéral de l'Intérieur. 1 January.

'Calculated Rates – Switzerland.’ Historical Population Data – USCB International Data Base. Suitland, MD: US Census Bureau Population Division. 1 April.

Historical Population Data – USCB International Data Base. Suitland, MD: US Census Bureau Population Division. 1 April.


All three of the sources for above. None a clickable link. None I can find doing a search. Do you mind liking me up to your sources?




jlf1961 -> RE: Feinstein's Bill (1/25/2013 8:11:44 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Switzerland. 2011. ‘Violent Infractions: Elucidations and Evolution of Infractions (Infractions de violence: Elucidations et Evolution des Infractions).’ Police Statistics on Crime Annual Report 2010 (Statistique Policière de la Criminalité Rapport Annuel 2010), p. 32. Neuchâtel: Office Fédéral de la Statistique / Département Fédéral de l'Intérieur. 1 January.

'Calculated Rates – Switzerland.’ Historical Population Data – USCB International Data Base. Suitland, MD: US Census Bureau Population Division. 1 April.

Historical Population Data – USCB International Data Base. Suitland, MD: US Census Bureau Population Division. 1 April.


All three of the sources for above. None a clickable link. None I can find doing a search. Do you mind liking me up to your sources?



Switzerland — Gun Facts, Figures and the Law

that is the closest thing I could find, I did google search for the documents you listed and all they took me to was a blank page.




slvemike4u -> RE: Feinstein's Bill (1/25/2013 9:27:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MyEnemy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

And we register,do safety checks and require insurance for each one,not only because they`re dangerous but because of their potential use/abuse by criminals/crazies and kids....


Which seems perfectly reasonable to normal people.....


But somehow guns are different.




Why do cars kill more people than guns despite all the regulation?

The difference you are looking for would be known as "intention"

When you can come back here and make the claim that "murder by car is as frequent as murder by firearm",we can have a discussion....till than it's just apples and oranges.




jlf1961 -> RE: Feinstein's Bill (1/25/2013 9:28:50 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u


quote:

ORIGINAL: MyEnemy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

And we register,do safety checks and require insurance for each one,not only because they`re dangerous but because of their potential use/abuse by criminals/crazies and kids....


Which seems perfectly reasonable to normal people.....


But somehow guns are different.




Why do cars kill more people than guns despite all the regulation?

The difference you are looking for would be known as "intention"

When you can come back here and make the claim that "murder by car is as frequent as murder by firearm",we can have a discussion....till than it's just apples and oranges.



That I would like to see, since all I can find are a few news items where the car was actually the intended murder weapon.




Nosathro -> RE: Feinstein's Bill (1/25/2013 10:48:57 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u


quote:

ORIGINAL: MyEnemy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

And we register,do safety checks and require insurance for each one,not only because they`re dangerous but because of their potential use/abuse by criminals/crazies and kids....


Which seems perfectly reasonable to normal people.....


But somehow guns are different.




Why do cars kill more people than guns despite all the regulation?

The difference you are looking for would be known as "intention"

When you can come back here and make the claim that "murder by car is as frequent as murder by firearm",we can have a discussion....till than it's just apples and oranges.



That I would like to see, since all I can find are a few news items where the car was actually the intended murder weapon.


perhaps not as frequent..but it does happen

http://www.cerescourier.com/main.asp?SectionID=1&SubSectionID=2&ArticleID=60175

http://www.newschannel6now.com/story/19648498/car-used

http://www.popville.com/2011/10/car-used-as-weapon-in-a-homicide-at-14th-and-webster-st-nw-thurs-afternoon/

http://www.timesunion.com/local/article/Man-who-used-car-as-weapon-sentenced-to-prison-3793421.php

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-57548845-504083/holly-solomon-pregnant-arizona-wife-runs-over-husband-for-not-voting-in-presidential-election-police-say/

This one is my favorite
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/08/06/1028157922214.html




DesideriScuri -> RE: Feinstein's Bill (1/25/2013 11:02:54 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
quote:

And, in the medical world, can't "brain dead" be reason enough for allowing the plug to be pulled without ethical considerations?

Only if you consider organ donation non-ethical.


Organ donation tends to be decided prior to an end of life situation, and would most likely be determined between the diagnosis of brain dead and actually pulling the plug. What I meant was that a physician could pull the plug - with the family's consent - without breaking the oath to do no harm.

quote:

quote:

Recall the maelstrom that surrounded the Terri Schiavo case? Can you not see how Government being in charge of making up their mind about the precise definition of a subjective term should scare the shit out of people who believe in Liberty and Freedom of choice?

Nope, I dont. Guns are far different from people's lives, and yet medicine is still decided, in part, based upon legal definitions and rulings.
Sorry, you have jumped on the band wagon of being paranoid about everything government. I am not going to join you. Healthy skepticism is what I prefer.


Yes, medical decisions are based. in part, on legal definitions. And, those legal definitions also tend to be concrete. The whole Terri Schiavo thing had an awful lot to do with an argument between two parts of the family over pulling the plug on someone that was brain dead, and had been. Government even weighed in on it.

Healthy skepticism is what I'm doing. Government has a tendency towards expansion, and I want things defined in concrete ways so that there is no opportunity for interpretations different from actual intent.




MyEnemy -> RE: Feinstein's Bill (1/25/2013 11:45:49 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u


quote:

ORIGINAL: MyEnemy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

And we register,do safety checks and require insurance for each one,not only because they`re dangerous but because of their potential use/abuse by criminals/crazies and kids....


Which seems perfectly reasonable to normal people.....


But somehow guns are different.




Why do cars kill more people than guns despite all the regulation?

The difference you are looking for would be known as "intention"

When you can come back here and make the claim that "murder by car is as frequent as murder by firearm",we can have a discussion....till than it's just apples and oranges.

So are you saying that the life of a person killed by a car is less valuable than the life of a person killed by a gun?
Besides that murder is murder regardless of how it is undertaken. Murder existed before guns, automobile accidents did not exist before automobiles. Logically by banning cars you can prevent 100% of automobile related deaths but banning guns isn't going to eliminate 100% of murders.
It is about saving lives isn't it?




Nosathro -> RE: Feinstein's Bill (1/26/2013 12:33:14 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TAFKAA


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

quote:

ORIGINAL: blacksword404

FR.

Tommy guns. She wants to ban tommy guns. How many people have even seen one? The one I saw was in a case along with Mauser's and other guns. And none of them fired.

Seems like she just looked for scary looking guns.



Considering she is banning some weapons that do not fall into the assault weapons classification, then it looks to me like a first step to banning all guns.

[image]https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc7/397425_440790239325565_1182630934_n.jpg[/image]

Fuck a duck, dude - the Switzerland thing has been comprehensively debunked. Are you going to keep repeating this nonsense for decades?




Yes, I do not think the NRA would really not want to use Switzerland as an example, to have a gun, there is alot of regulations to comply with:

The rules laid out above were changed on 1 December 2008 as Switzerland joined the Schengen treaty
Unlawful possession of guns will be punished.
Gun trade among individuals will require a valid weapon acquisition permit. Weapons acquired from an individual in the last ten years (which did not require a weapon acquisition permit) have to be registered. As a central weapons register was politically unfeasible, the authorities hope to get an overview of the market through this registration requirement.
Every gun must be marked with a registered serial number.

To carry a loaded firearm in public or outdoors (and for an individual who is a member of the militia carrying a firearm other than his Army-issue personal weapons off-duty), a person must have a Waffentragbewilligung (gun carrying permit), which in most cases is issued only to private citizens working in occupations such as security.

Conditions for getting a Carrying PermitThere are three conditions:

fulfilling the conditions for buying a permit (see section below)
stating plausibly the need to carry firearms to protect oneself, other people, or real property from a specified danger
passing an examination proving both weapon handling skills and knowledge regarding lawful use of the weapon
The carrying permit remains valid for a term of five years (unless otherwise surrendered or revoked), and applies only to the type of firearm for which the permit was issued. Additional constraints may be invoked to modify any specific permit

Transporting gunsGuns may be transported in public as long as an appropriate justification is present. This means to transport a gun in public, the following requirements apply:

The ammunition must be separated from the gun, no ammunition in a magazine.
The transport has to be direct, i.e.:
For courses or exercises hosted by marksmanship, hunting or military organisations,
To an army warehouse and back,
To and from a holder of a valid arms trade permit,
To and from a specific event, i.e. gun shows.

Basically, the sale of automatic firearms, selective fire weapons and certain accessories such as sound suppressors ("silencers") is forbidden (as is the sale of certain disabled automatic firearms which have been identified as easily restored to fully automatic capability). The purchase of such items is however legal with a special permit issued by cantonal police. The issuance of such a permit requires additional requirements to be met, e.g. the possession of a specific gun locker.[citation needed]
Most types of ammunition are available for commercial sale, including full metal jacket bullet calibres for military-issue weapons; hollow point rounds are only permitted for hunters. Ammunition sales are registered only at the point of sale by recording the buyer's name in a bound book
Conditions under the 1999 Gun ActTo purchase a firearm in a commercial shop, one needs to have a Waffenerwerbsschein (weapon acquisition permit). A permit allows the purchase of three firearms. Everyone over the age of 18 who is not psychiatrically disqualified (such as having had a history of endangering his own life or the lives of others) or identified as posing security problems, and who has a clean criminal record (requires a Criminal Records Bureau check) can request such a permit.
To buy a gun from an individual, no permit is needed, but the seller is expected to establish a reasonable certainty that the purchaser will fulfill the above-mentioned conditions (usually done through a Criminal Records Bureau check). The participants in such a transaction are required to prepare a written contract detailing the identities of both vendor and purchaser, the weapon's type, manufacturer, and serial number. The law requires the written contract to be kept for ten years by the buyer and seller. The seller is also required to see some official ID from the purchaser, for such sales are only allowed to Swiss nationals and foreigners with a valid residence permit, with the exception of those foreigners that come from certain countries (Croatia, Bosnia, Macedonia, Turkey, Sri Lanka, Albania, Algeria), to whom such sales are not allowed even if they do have a residence permit. Foreigners without a residence permit must ask for Waffenerwerbsschein (weapon acquisition permitIn October 2007, the Swiss Federal Council decided that the distribution of ammunition to soldiers shall stop and that all previously issued ammo shall be returned. By March 2011, more than 99% of the ammo has been received. Only special rapid deployment units and the military police still have ammunition stored at home today).
I could go on




Kirata -> RE: Feinstein's Bill (1/26/2013 4:17:07 AM)


~ FR ~

While Feinstein and others are claiming that a bunch of ordinary semi-automatic rifles are "assault weapons," a DHS solicitation classifies selective fire (full-auto) arms with 30-round clips as "personal defense weapons... suitable for use in close quarters."

Personal Defense Weapons Solicitation, Solicitation Number: HSCEMS-12-R-00011

Section C of solicitation number HSCEMS-12-R-00011

[image]http://tatoufaux.com/IMG/arton560.jpg[/image]

K.




jlf1961 -> RE: Feinstein's Bill (1/26/2013 5:06:58 AM)

I am not a member of the NRA, and a gun owner...

That said, having read the regulations in Switzerland, I could actually agree with them.




Yachtie -> RE: Feinstein's Bill (1/26/2013 5:08:48 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

I am not a member of the NRA, and a gun owner...

That said, having read the regulations in Switzerland, I could actually agree with them.



Were the Swiss having a problem the Schengen treaty corrected?




jlf1961 -> RE: Feinstein's Bill (1/26/2013 5:10:54 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

I am not a member of the NRA, and a gun owner...

That said, having read the regulations in Switzerland, I could actually agree with them.



Were the Swiss having a problem the Schengen treaty corrected?



Not really. But then some people grasp at any straw in a storm. The swiss gun control laws make better sense than Feinstein's bill, with the exception of the limit to how many guns you can own.




DomKen -> RE: Feinstein's Bill (1/26/2013 7:07:20 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

quote:

Government statistics for the year 2010[15] records 40 homicides involving firearms, out of the 53 cases of homicide in 2010.

The annual rate of homicide by any means per 100,000 population was 0.70.[16] The annual rate of homicide by guns per 100,000 population was 0.52.[17]
source


Now what part of the large number of guns in private hands vs. gun crime has been disproved?

The part about large numbers of guns being in private hands.

Only about half of swiss men ages 20 to 30 are required to keep a military weapon in their home (amounting to about 200k weapons out of a population of 8 million).




jlf1961 -> RE: Feinstein's Bill (1/26/2013 9:37:49 AM)

[image]http://www.mrconservative.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/12-470x307.jpg[/image]

Oh by the way, Number of Privately Owned Firearms
The estimated total number of guns held by civilians in Switzerland is 3,400,000

source




Aylee -> RE: Feinstein's Bill (1/26/2013 1:26:31 PM)

"Mrs. Feinstein's measure would exempt more than 2,200 types of hunting and sporting rifles; guns manually operated by bolt, pump, lever or slide action; and weapons used by government officials, law enforcement and retired law enforcement personnel," the Washington Times http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jan/24/feinstein-rolls-out-proposal-ban-assault-weapons/print/ reports.

HuffPo confirms it: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/24/dianne-feinstein-assault-weapons-ban_n_2541743.html

Is this a Titles Of Nobility Clause violation?




Powergamz1 -> RE: Feinstein's Bill (1/26/2013 1:38:31 PM)

Are you seriously claiming that 200K out of 8 million is the entire total number of guns in private hands in Switzerland?

Try again, Switzerland is #3 with per capita gun ownership at 46%.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_gun_ownership





quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

quote:

Government statistics for the year 2010[15] records 40 homicides involving firearms, out of the 53 cases of homicide in 2010.

The annual rate of homicide by any means per 100,000 population was 0.70.[16] The annual rate of homicide by guns per 100,000 population was 0.52.[17]
source


Now what part of the large number of guns in private hands vs. gun crime has been disproved?

The part about large numbers of guns being in private hands.

Only about half of swiss men ages 20 to 30 are required to keep a military weapon in their home (amounting to about 200k weapons out of a population of 8 million).





Baroana -> RE: Feinstein's Bill (1/26/2013 1:44:09 PM)

Fast reply.

Just so you know, Feinstein carries.




Baroana -> RE: Feinstein's Bill (1/26/2013 1:46:51 PM)

Correction, she used to. I guess she doesn't anymore, at least according to this rather unfriendly article.

I can tell you though that if she has stopped packing heat, it isn't because she's a Senator. I have it on good authority that she was still carrying as recently as the early 2000's.

http://www.ijreview.com/2013/01/32591-busted-gun-control-legislator-dianne-feinstein-discusses-why-she-concealed-carry-firearms/




tazzygirl -> RE: Feinstein's Bill (1/26/2013 6:07:46 PM)

quote:

Organ donation tends to be decided prior to an end of life situation, and would most likely be determined between the diagnosis of brain dead and actually pulling the plug. What I meant was that a physician could pull the plug - with the family's consent - without breaking the oath to do no harm.


Depends on what oath they take.

One version says....Hippocratic Corpus

I will apply dietetic measures for the benefit of the sick according to my ability and judgment; I will keep them from harm and injustice.

Another says... The Hippocratic writing Epidemics

I will prescribe regimens for the good of my patients according to my ability and my judgment and never do harm to anyone.

There are various oaths... not all mention "doing no harm"

http://www.aapsonline.org/ethics/oaths.htm

As we have become more global in our healthcare providers, its a good idea to remember that.

quote:

Yes, medical decisions are based. in part, on legal definitions. And, those legal definitions also tend to be concrete. The whole Terri Schiavo thing had an awful lot to do with an argument between two parts of the family over pulling the plug on someone that was brain dead, and had been. Government even weighed in on it.


If they were concrete, they would not change, nor would there be so many lawsuits. Medical law is always changing.





Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
4.296875E-02