Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

REMINDER


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> REMINDER Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
REMINDER - 6/20/2006 5:29:10 AM   
ModeratorEleven


Posts: 2007
Joined: 8/14/2005
Status: offline
Please keep in mind that threads involving children (and this most certainly includes 'breeding' fetishes) are not allowed here.

Thank you,

XI 

_____________________________

This mod goes to eleven.
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: REMINDER - 6/20/2006 5:38:55 AM   
Brosco


Posts: 238
Joined: 5/29/2006
Status: offline
uuummmmm to speak for another member here that posted and then had another seem to raise this issue ...  is a request for a lack of children taken as a similar violation and thus against TOS?  Seems to me that his post should be perfectly acceptable.. or am I missing something?

_____________________________

Any Dom that believes he is in complete control ... has a very clever subbie.

(in reply to ModeratorEleven)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: REMINDER - 6/20/2006 5:45:52 AM   
Kedikat


Posts: 680
Joined: 4/20/2006
Status: offline
Noted.
Feel free to delete the thread in question.
I hope the discussion keeps to the purely social aspects.

(in reply to ModeratorEleven)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: REMINDER - 6/20/2006 6:58:24 AM   
ClassAct2006


Posts: 318
Joined: 4/12/2006
Status: offline
Confine it to a discussion of care for elderly relatives instead perhaps... which in fact I find... suitable men my age often do live with mother who's over 80 and needs nursing care which I'm afraid I find less attractive than the other encumbrances.

(in reply to Kedikat)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: REMINDER - 6/20/2006 7:21:44 AM   
marieToo


Posts: 3595
Joined: 5/21/2006
From: Jersey
Status: offline
General reply:

There are Doms/Masters out there that want a sub/slave with no other obligations...or at least, *minimal* ones, so that the sub/slave may have more time and energy to dedicate to the Master and the relationship.  I think its cool to seek whatever you want.  But you are *way* narrowing your options and maybe passing up alot of potential partners.  Obligations to others dont usually mean you have no time to dedicate to a good relationship,  furthermore obligations to others who depend on you, dont last forever.

(in reply to ClassAct2006)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: REMINDER - 6/20/2006 11:11:25 AM   
Proprietrix


Posts: 756
Joined: 7/15/2005
From: Ohio/West Virginia
Status: offline
Ok, since Mod 11 opened this door, I'm going to ask some valid (I hope) questions to try to get some direct answers. These are questions I've been wanting to ask for a while now, but never really felt there would be any benefit in putting on the table. Please mods, don't take this as me trying to be argumentative. I really am looking for answers here.

The forum guidelines here on collarme say:
"Topics which are unacceptable regardless of circumstance include, but are not limited to - minors, bestiality, incest, necrophilia, snuff and criminal activities."
I'm very curious on several levels.

Why is it stated "minors" instead of "pedophilia"? I've noticed that this particular wording makes it sometimes difficult to have valid, intellectual discussions about parenting, discovering at what point one realized they were lifestyle oriented, and sometimes even age-play and TNG groups. For the most part, I think the mods do a wonderful job differentiating valid discussion and quickly kicking "that which is inappropriate" to the curb. And don't get me wrong. I'm not on a pro-pedo kick here at all! But I have occasionally seen someone open a thread about parenting and because the title had one particular word in it, the thread suddenly vanishes.
Is it really necessary for us to have to "code-word" by saying we're the mother of an "unmentionable"? I just never really thought of referring to my son the same way my grandmother referred to her underwear.
Should we be code-wording like that at all?
And I get confused on locations too. Technically, a "minor" in the USA is probably someone under 18. However, I’ve seen it said many times that in certain places (was it Canada?) that 14 is legal age. I’ve seen threads locked/pulled due to discussions of 17 year olds, even when those 17 year olds lived in vicinities that legally defined them as adults.

And why are beastiality, incest, necrophilia, and snuff listed separately? Are they not, in most jurisdictions, already inside the realm of criminal activity anyway? Why were those particular crimes singled out?

And when it says "criminal activity"... doesn't that cover a large amount of activities we discuss regularly without ever blinking, and with zero moderation? Isn't flogging, punching, smacking, paddling someone considered assault or battery in most places, consensual or not? Same with sodomy in some places? These "criminal activities" are ones we are allowed to discuss all the time.

If I say "I have a teenage son." have I violated TOS by mentioning a minor?
Is that statement an equal violation of TOS as bringing up pedophilia?
If I change the words to "I have an underage unmentionable." aren’t I still mentioning a minor, just using different words?

If I say "I enjoy cutting my submissive with a knife." technically, in my jurisdiction, I’ve just confessed to enjoying committing a 1st degree felony: assault with a deadly weapon, in which consent is not a defense. 25 years in prison for that one.
However, if I say I enjoy necrophilia, technically, in my jurisdiction, I’m confessing to enjoying committing a 4th degree misdemeanor. 6 months probation for that one.

The second is much less a "criminal activity" than the first. Yet here on CM, where the rule is "No mentioning criminal activity." I can get away with the first on a daily basis and there’s a pretty good chance the second would get moderated.

How exactly is it that the moderators decide which things are too "bad" to talk about and which ones are ok to discuss at length and often,
even though both topics obviously violate TOS?

Does it boil down to what a particular mod thinks is morally ok?
I'm not being sarcastic or trying to change the guidelines.
I guess I’m more trying to understand them.

_____________________________

IMO, IMHO, YMMV, AFAIK, to me, I see it as, from my perspective, it's been my experience, I only speak for myself, (and all other disclaimers here).

(in reply to ModeratorEleven)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: REMINDER - 6/20/2006 11:57:08 AM   
Kedikat


Posts: 680
Joined: 4/20/2006
Status: offline
I would think the moderators take no joy in deleting threads.
But they have to watch their butts and the reputation in general of the site.
Threads with no intentions of breaking the rules are still open to wide varieties of opinions and types of responses.
I imagine it keeps the moderators a bit less busy to draw some wider guidlines.

I'm not sure if that particular thread would have passed the rules test, if a certain subject had not popped up. When it did, it got dicey for sure.

It was a lively discussion while it lasted. I did get some insight.

It is a fuzzy legal issue with a lot of our topics. In a way, the site could be construed as being a place to incite or lure to an illegal activity of some type. I'm sure there are those repressed ones that are seeking to find a way to charge these sort of places with just such things. To deny some free speech.

(in reply to Proprietrix)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: REMINDER - 6/20/2006 12:06:25 PM   
Taylore


Posts: 121
Joined: 6/19/2006
Status: offline
Often sites of this kind are policed by different agencies. The use of certain words will bring up the site in their searches. Discussing certain topics and using certain words is against the law. That is why they ask that when speaking of young ones, that the use of the word ch****en not be used. Many sites employ the same rules within their TOS.

_____________________________

Taylore

(in reply to Kedikat)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: REMINDER - 6/20/2006 12:14:29 PM   
MistressOfGa


Posts: 2929
Status: offline
Proprietrix,
You have made some really valid points and I am curious as to the answers as well. I have often wondered the same things. Kudos for putting into words what many of us may be thinking.

_____________________________





(in reply to Taylore)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: REMINDER - 6/20/2006 12:53:32 PM   
trippingdaisy


Posts: 113
Joined: 6/3/2006
From: Georgia
Status: offline
Thank You, Proprietrix. i'm glad these questions were asked.

In November, i'm going to have a child. i'd like to know whether or not i can mention my son or daughter in a purely non-sexual, non-BDSM sense.

(in reply to Proprietrix)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: REMINDER - 6/25/2006 12:43:30 AM   
MistressDREAD


Posts: 2943
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
quote:

In November, i'm going to have a child. i'd like to know whether or not i can mention my son or daughter in a purely non-sexual, non-BDSM sense.

Of course you can trippingdaisy, but NOT on an adult alternate lifestyle BDSM site.

See rather We like it or not, We do NOT have freedom of speach here at the moment but of course you COULD contact your Congress and Senators and President and tell them all you want to keep the W W W and Internet totally FREE and make a change in the current climate of socieites moral right. The 3 P's apply:   Politics, Police and Protical. You can get more information on the loss court cases that have a direct impact on what you say and do when online at the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom   ,.-*'^'*-.,NCSF_,.*'^'*-., 

(in reply to trippingdaisy)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: REMINDER - 6/25/2006 1:40:11 AM   
IrishMist


Posts: 7480
Joined: 11/17/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: trippingdaisy

Thank You, Proprietrix. i'm glad these questions were asked.

In November, i'm going to have a child. i'd like to know whether or not i can mention my son or daughter in a purely non-sexual, non-BDSM sense.



Why do so many have such a hard time understanding a simple concept. This is an ADULT website. You can not mention the "C" word on an adult website.

It's actually very simple. MistressDread said it perfectly. We DO NOT have freedom of speech here on this site. The "C" word IS TABOO.

_____________________________

If I said something to offend you, please tell me what it was so that I can say it again later.


(in reply to trippingdaisy)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: REMINDER - 6/25/2006 2:19:22 AM   
trippingdaisy


Posts: 113
Joined: 6/3/2006
From: Georgia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: IrishMist

quote:

ORIGINAL: trippingdaisy

Thank You, Proprietrix. i'm glad these questions were asked.

In November, i'm going to have a child. i'd like to know whether or not i can mention my son or daughter in a purely non-sexual, non-BDSM sense.



Why do so many have such a hard time understanding a simple concept. This is an ADULT website. You can not mention the "C" word on an adult website.

It's actually very simple. MistressDread said it perfectly. We DO NOT have freedom of speech here on this site. The "C" word IS TABOO.


i'd like to suggest that you read my question carefully. :) i asked if i could. i never said i should be ABLE to. i was asking a simple question, as a fairly new user, who wanted clarification.

i'm unsure why a simple question like that illicted a rather..unpleasant response. A simple explanation would have sufficed. i'm perfectly capable of understanding the concept.

That being said, i thank you for the answer, if not for the tone.


_____________________________

Life is either a daring adventure, or nothing.

(in reply to IrishMist)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: REMINDER - 6/25/2006 3:21:48 AM   
Slipstreme


Posts: 817
Joined: 1/1/2006
Status: offline
Just out of curiosity, since parenting is something that was brought up, and I have seen several worried questions about how to hide things from kids, wouldn't questions about how to parent a child while living an adult lifestyle be an appropriate topic? I would think such topics could help parents avoid having to have long discussions with their kids until they are ready to. I mean, wouldn't advice about how to manage a child while you are in a D/s or S&M lifestyle be of valid use to prevent exposing minors to the lifestyle itself? 

_____________________________

Living the Dichotomy

Painslut? How about "Endorphin Junkie"?

For information about "the furry thing" please check out my profile journal entry for: 1/17/2006

Alpha of a leather family of four. Master to the slave z.

(in reply to trippingdaisy)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: REMINDER - 6/25/2006 3:47:18 AM   
IronBear


Posts: 9008
Joined: 6/19/2005
From: Beenleigh, Qld, Australia
Status: offline
Interesting regarding criminal activities which i had forgotten btw, that there seems to be a very fine line between stating that you will execute a peodifile who attacks you kids (for example0 and stating uncatogorically as I have that any one harming my family will get a lethal responce from me. Having stated that, I can argue that under Queensland Criminal Law there are very specific areas in which a lethal responce is acceptable under law.... (Justifiable Homicide).... I half expect to be sinned binned at times but it is worth it to make a point.... 

_____________________________

Iron Bear

Master of Bruin Cottage

http://www.bruincottage.org

Your attitude, words & actions are yours. Take responsibility for them and the consequences they incur.

D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F.

(in reply to Slipstreme)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: REMINDER - 6/25/2006 3:59:33 AM   
mons


Posts: 2400
Joined: 11/16/2005
Status: offline
greeting to all
 
i do not see why everyone that is read is making this a subject to fight over who in the world would want to talk about minors in this site unless a person is having a baby, i think it is right to strict the wording of anything to do with minors this is not the place ever. if anyone feel wedo not have freedom of speech then we should not if we need to speak of minors i see no  reason to even talk of them in the forums the moderater are right in TOS anyone who use the minor in a subject in any forum here, why would anyone want to it is not a sane nor safe thing to do. at all i say take my free speech away if  i bring minors into the subject we deal with here it would be sick now i may have maany who think i am wrong i do not care. no minor here at all in not forum or subject or anything.  but tell me why would anyone do it ?
 
mons/jane

(in reply to Slipstreme)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: REMINDER - 6/25/2006 4:11:44 AM   
NativeDad


Posts: 8
Joined: 2/11/2005
Status: offline
It seems simple to me, that the TOS is a CONSENTUAL agreement which we enter upon membership to this site. No, it isn't necessarily 'fair' to people who wish to chat on certain 'taboo' subjects, yet WE AGREE before ever coming Onsite. If you come to my house, you WILL take your shoes off to enter. Don't like it? Don't come in. It is non-negotiable, as many things in life are. I am burdened with creatures, which I love, I do not discuss those here, rather in other, parenting sites which are accepting of my questions regarding invisibility of lifestyle choices to them.

_____________________________

"If you can't be good...

.... You Probably just lack Discipline."

(in reply to mons)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: REMINDER - 6/25/2006 4:19:56 AM   
Brosco


Posts: 238
Joined: 5/29/2006
Status: offline
So, I ask again, why did a thread about saying 'no children' get pulled into this category?

_____________________________

Any Dom that believes he is in complete control ... has a very clever subbie.

(in reply to NativeDad)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: REMINDER - 6/25/2006 4:30:50 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Because it is the most widely browsed catagory and a few people have been posting things that encroach on the spirit if not the letter of TOS concerning the youth lately.

So, rather than shut the site down, Miss ModE is wagging a finger and gently castigating.............LOLOLOL.



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Brosco)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: REMINDER - 6/25/2006 4:35:31 AM   
Brosco


Posts: 238
Joined: 5/29/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Because it is the most widely browsed catagory and a few people have been posting things that encroach on the spirit if not the letter of TOS concerning the youth lately.

So, rather than shut the site down, Miss ModE is wagging a finger and gently castigating.............LOLOLOL.




and perhaps you are coming in 2 days too late and missed what really happened.

The warning was issued when nothing was in the slightest hint - but clearly someone hit the 'report' button on a topic that they didn't like, and the mod overreacted.

_____________________________

Any Dom that believes he is in complete control ... has a very clever subbie.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> REMINDER Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078