Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Home Defence


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Home Defence Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Home Defence - 2/15/2013 9:03:06 AM   
tommonymous


Posts: 404
Joined: 1/21/2013
Status: offline
Thanks for the reply, Muttling. I knew about the slower part. I didn't think about buckshot being softer, poorly-formed, and not rotating.

Also, Minnesota DOES have a retreat law. So, all you other 'Sotans, if you have any chance to run from the threat, you are legally required to do so. As has been stated previously, know the laws for YOUR state. Mine are likely different...

_____________________________

"Remember kids. Just because it hasn't happened to you doesn't mean it doesn't happen at all." --Hillwilliam

And just because it worked for you, doesn't mean it will (or ought to) work for everyone.

(in reply to Muttling)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: Home Defence - 2/15/2013 10:27:07 AM   
Nosathro


Posts: 3319
Joined: 9/25/2005
From: Orange County, California
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tommonymous

Thanks for the reply, Muttling. I knew about the slower part. I didn't think about buckshot being softer, poorly-formed, and not rotating.

Also, Minnesota DOES have a retreat law. So, all you other 'Sotans, if you have any chance to run from the threat, you are legally required to do so. As has been stated previously, know the laws for YOUR state. Mine are likely different...


Minnesota does not have a Stand Your Ground Law but it does have a strict use of force law.

http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/news/141766443.html

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=609.06

There was a court ruling on retreat

https://litigation-essentials.lexisnexis.com/webcd/app?action=DocumentDisplay&crawlid=1&doctype=cite&docid=29+Wm.+Mitchell+L.+Rev.+657&srctype=smi&srcid=3B15&key=d7d31a8f03a8ea878d47dc8984bc92f0

(in reply to tommonymous)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: Home Defence - 2/15/2013 10:35:29 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Minnesota has a castle doctrine and it has been defended successfully. If I am in my home, car, travel trailer, fishhouse, I am in my castle.  I can shoot you.  

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Nosathro)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: Home Defence - 2/15/2013 10:40:40 AM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tommonymous

Muttling, thanks for the post. Lots of very good information. But, could you please explain this:

quote:

ORIGINAL muttling
OO buck fires several 9mm (e.g. .38 caliber) balls at the target. Getting hit by 1 shot of 00 buck from a 12 gauge is like getting hit 7 times by a 9mm as it fires 7 balls that are 9mm in diameter. The 20 gauge barrel is too small for 00 buck so you go with No. 3 which fires 20 balls that are .14 caliber. Neither shot size is likely to go through the wall in a house...



Bullets fired from a 9mm pistol easily penetrate multiple sheetrock walls, and only move about 30% faster (very roughly) than an average shotgun load. I have a hard time with the idea that OO buckshot won't penetrate a wall. Also, readers should keep in mind that a miss or partial hit allows for multiple 9mm projectiles to pass the intended target and eventually find an unintended target with much more force-per-pellet than birdshot.

For penetration, you also have to factor in the mass of the projectile.
A typical 9mm bullet is 124 gr
A typical 00 buckshot pellet is 55gr.

Mass x Velicity = energy

Even if the shotgun pellet was travelling at the same speed as a pistol bullet, it only has about 44% of the energy and therefore gross penetrative power. Combine that with the shape and lack of a jacket and you have something that is a lot less likely to go thru walls and still have any kind of leftover velocity.

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to tommonymous)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: Home Defence - 2/15/2013 11:25:00 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Muttling

I didn't want to join in a debate and mostly been listening. The conversation has been quite accurate. Here's a summary with a little addition from my knowledge on the subject (which I have taught self defense and concealed carry classes.)

The OP said he's in a castle law state, that's very cool but understand that castle law is a general term and the details vary from state to state so you must make absolutely certain to understand the laws of your state if you are going to have a self defense firearm at ANY time. In Tennessee, it pretty straight forward.......once they make unlawful entry into your home (not come onto your property or try to steal your car from your driveway or even try to break down the door......once they actually make entry) you are presumed to be in fear for your life and can use lethal force to eliminate the threat. That doesn't say you can kill them. That only says that it is reasonable for you to fear for your life and you can shoot without giving a warning to neutralize the fear. If police show up and you say "I killed the mother fucker for coming into my house" it's going to go very badly for you. If you say "I was in fear for my life so I had to shoot him" its different. If you're smart, you'll say "My weapon is over there and I do not wish to answer any further questions until I speak with my attorney." Regardless of what the details are or what you say......you can COUNT on a trip to jail, you can COUNT on a wrongful death civil court law suit, and you can COUNT on some form of criminal court proceedings.

As for weapons of choice, handguns are easily concealed but not the weapon of choice when it comes time to act unless the attacker is directly on you when you decide to act. Over penetration has been brought up frequently and this is an issue for most handgun cartridges (an issue that can be addressed with frangible ammunition, but still an issue.) By over penetration, I mean what does the bullet or shot do after hitting the target or a wall? Does it keep going and potentially hit an unintended target? You will be held criminally and civilly responsible for every round you send down range.

There is no better close quarters combat weapon than a short barrel shotgun. In the U.S., the minimum legal barrel length is 24 inches and that is what should be selected. (Don't take it on a hunting trip to Mexico or you will be arrested for possession of a sawed off shotgun as they require 25 inches.) The pump is nice as it's easier to clear a jam, less likely to jam, and has severe intimidation factor from the noise of cycling the chamber. Remember, you may not be required to give warning before you shoot but ANY shooting is going to be a major legal issue costing a LOT of time and money even if your shooting is justified and you are found to completely in the right. A nice "chunk chunk" noise followed by an intruder running away will always go better for you.

As for size and cartridge selection, it has been mentioned that one should avoid magnum cartridges and that a 20 gauge is better than a 12 gauge. What hasn't been mentioned is why. Magnums are much louder, have much larger flash, and give heavier recoil. All of these things are major issues for speed and accuracy of a second shot. The noise and flash can be monster issues when shooting in doors as a 12 gauge with magnum shells is like a flash bang grenade in addition to the shot coming out of the barrel and it effects everyone in the room (including the defender shooting the shotgun.) Stepping down from a 12 to a 20 is similar to comparing a magnum to a regular cartridge, the 20 is easier to control with less noise and flash while still having a lot of stopping power. I run a 12 for my home weapon, but I've grown up handling firearms and have a lot of training so I feel better prepared to cope with issues from a 12. I hunt with magnums (especially when hunting turkey) but I don't run magnums for self defense as they really do have a lot of impact on the speed and accuracy of my second shot.

Speaking of stopping power, there is the last item....shot selection. Double ought buck or OO buck is the only way to go for 12 gauge and no. 3 shot is what you want for 20 gauges. Slugs are effective but have monster over penetration issues unless you buy frangible when defeats the purpose of a slug. Slugs are meant to have a lot of penetration along with the OMG hitting power of a shotgun. OO buck fires several 9mm (e.g. .38 caliber) balls at the target. Getting hit by 1 shot of 00 buck from a 12 gauge is like getting hit 7 times by a 9mm as it fires 7 balls that are 9mm in diameter. The 20 gauge barrel is too small for 00 buck so you go with No. 3 which fires 20 balls that are .14 caliber. Neither shot size is likely to go through the wall in a house or exit a human body so the risk of hitting someone else after you hit your intended target is lower than the risk with a pistol cartridge.......however, the risk is ALWAYS there.

I hope this helps. For more complete information, get thee to a gun range and take some classes. Firearm ownership is a right, but it is also a responsibility and you simply can't do it well without good training.

Good except for a couple of details.
1, in the US minimum shotgun barrell length is 18", I have one from factory at 19".
2. 00ought has nine pellets of .32
3. 20 ga will fire 00ought but not as many pellets.
4. at ranges under 5 yards no 4 shot is lethal and even less likely to penetrate walls.

< Message edited by BamaD -- 2/15/2013 11:32:39 AM >

(in reply to Muttling)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: Home Defence - 2/15/2013 11:36:41 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
In Alabama the castle starts at the moat (property line).
Till about the turn of the century we had to retreat , even inside our home and fire a warning shot.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: Home Defence - 2/15/2013 11:45:28 AM   
tommonymous


Posts: 404
Joined: 1/21/2013
Status: offline
Well, just goes to show you. Don't read all the bullshit you believe on the internets.

_____________________________

"Remember kids. Just because it hasn't happened to you doesn't mean it doesn't happen at all." --Hillwilliam

And just because it worked for you, doesn't mean it will (or ought to) work for everyone.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: Home Defence - 2/15/2013 11:52:34 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tommonymous

Well, just goes to show you. Don't read all the bullshit you believe on the internets.

Observation no revelation?

(in reply to tommonymous)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: Home Defence - 2/15/2013 1:31:38 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tommonymous

Ha! Nice work PeonForHer! I read that and thought, "German-fluting? Did he mean well-"shimmed"? What the fu-ohhhh..."

I've been waiting patiently, and this made my day.

Kirata, I'm sorry for laughing, and I truly hope I've caused no offense.

Not at all. But I admit I needed his prompting to go back and read it again. The first time around, I just figured he didn't know squat about guns and got something he'd read somewhere screwed up.

K.


< Message edited by Kirata -- 2/15/2013 1:32:34 PM >

(in reply to tommonymous)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: Home Defence - 2/15/2013 2:46:37 PM   
stephINca


Posts: 87
Joined: 1/19/2013
Status: offline
I never suggest a shotgun for home defence. Just my 2 cents.

(in reply to MasterJohnSteed)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: Home Defence - 2/15/2013 2:46:46 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata
The first time around, I just figured he didn't know squat about guns and got something he'd read somewhere screwed up.


You were right the first time. I *do* know squat about guns. I haven't a clue about them.

ETA

Some time, I'm going to have to start a thread on Stephen Potter, Oneupmanship, and my sig line.

ETA again:

I've got to hand it to myself, 'German-fluted' was just genius. I'm proud of that one.

< Message edited by PeonForHer -- 2/15/2013 2:55:16 PM >


_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: Home Defence - 2/15/2013 3:59:49 PM   
Powergamz1


Posts: 1927
Joined: 9/3/2011
Status: offline
That isn't what the castle doctrine means.

And there are states, like Minnesota where you right to defend yourself at home is restricted by some form of retreat requirement.
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Minnesota has a castle doctrine and it has been defended successfully. If I am in my home, car, travel trailer, fishhouse, I am in my castle.  I can shoot you.  



_____________________________

"DOMA is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment" Anthony McLeod Kennedy

" About damn time...wooot!!' Me

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: Home Defence - 2/15/2013 4:21:26 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Powergamz1

That isn't what the castle doctrine means.

And there are states, like Minnesota where you right to defend yourself at home is restricted by some form of retreat requirement.
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Minnesota has a castle doctrine and it has been defended successfully. If I am in my home, car, travel trailer, fishhouse, I am in my castle.  I can shoot you.  



You have to know the law in your state

(in reply to Powergamz1)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: Home Defence - 2/15/2013 4:53:48 PM   
Muttling


Posts: 1612
Joined: 9/30/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD



You have to know the law in your state



As is obvious from the responses to my posts, I don't know everything and there's plenty of room for debate on a lot of things.


However, the above comment is the ONE thing that I am absolutely resolute on and everyone should take as the gospel.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: Home Defence - 2/15/2013 4:58:51 PM   
Muttling


Posts: 1612
Joined: 9/30/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


3. 20 ga will fire 00ought but not as many pellets.




Cool, can you give me a link to the manufacturer that sells 20 gauge 00 buck shells? My daughter has a 20 for her home weapon and I would far prefer to give her those over No. 3 shot.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: Home Defence - 2/15/2013 4:59:52 PM   
tommonymous


Posts: 404
Joined: 1/21/2013
Status: offline
So, in the interest of muddying the Minnesota waters even further : Findlaw has some case history included in the analysis of a judgement from 1998.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Findlaw, section 2, paragraph 7 (watch out for the paragraph split by a quote)

The principle that there is no duty to retreat inside one's home is generally termed the “castle doctrine.”   A majority, if not an overwhelming majority, of American jurisdictions have adopted it.   See Gainer v. State, 40 Md.App. 382, 391 A.2d 856, 860-61 (1978) (stating that castle doctrine is “universally recognized exception” to duty to retreat), cert. denied (Md. Dec. 15, 1978);  cf.  State v. Walton, 615 A.2d 469, 471 (R.I.1992) (stating that a “majority of American jurisdictions” recognize the castle doctrine).   Nevertheless, the four cases discussed above, although they do not acknowledge the castle doctrine or discuss the policies for or against it, do establish a line of Minnesota authority departing from the majority position and supporting the trial court's instruction in this case.1



quote:

ORIGINAL: Findlaw, Footnote 1

1.  Carothers cites State v. McPherson, 114 Minn. 498, 131 N.W. 645 (1911), for the proposition that Minnesota does not impose a duty to retreat within the place of abode.   But McPherson involved a co-occupant, a fellow seaman shot in the bunkroom he and the defendant shared, and discusses the issue in terms of the “retreat to the wall” doctrine, stating that defendant “was about as close to the ‘wall’ as it was possible to get.”  Id. at 500, 131 N.W. at 646.   Thus, the case is distinguishable both legally and on its facts.



Does anyone have a link to a law written since this case which would reverse what looks to me like a duty to retreat if there's no felony being committed. It seems (based on the link) that what is termed as "defense of dwelling" is not applicable once someone is actually in your home in Minnesota. Can anyone shed some light (new or otherwise) on this for me? I'm more confused than I have been in long time. I must be getting rusty...




_____________________________

"Remember kids. Just because it hasn't happened to you doesn't mean it doesn't happen at all." --Hillwilliam

And just because it worked for you, doesn't mean it will (or ought to) work for everyone.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: Home Defence - 2/15/2013 5:08:36 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Muttling


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD



You have to know the law in your state



As is obvious from the responses to my posts, I don't know everything and there's plenty of room for debate on a lot of things.


However, the above comment is the ONE thing that I am absolutely resolute on and everyone should take as the gospel.

Nobody knows everything and it wise to be aware of this.

(in reply to Muttling)
Profile   Post #: 97
RE: Home Defence - 2/15/2013 5:09:54 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Muttling


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


3. 20 ga will fire 00ought but not as many pellets.




Cool, can you give me a link to the manufacturer that sells 20 gauge 00 buck shells? My daughter has a 20 for her home weapon and I would far prefer to give her those over No. 3 shot.

Unfortunatly no I have not been able to get them either.
try this www.luckygunner.com/
or this ammo.net/
in looking I did fnd a site that indicated (it was a chat site so take that into account) there is a better chance of problems with 00 in a 20 than a 12

< Message edited by BamaD -- 2/15/2013 5:22:15 PM >

(in reply to Muttling)
Profile   Post #: 98
RE: Home Defence - 2/15/2013 5:52:59 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJohnSteed

Thinking of getting a pump Action Shotgun for home defense. I do not plan on going hunting with the thing, I just need something to blow a hole through someone if they come in the house.

Anyone have any suggestions on make or model? price range I should look at?


Cannon. No more than 15 grand....anything more is (in my opinion) excessive.

(in reply to MasterJohnSteed)
Profile   Post #: 99
RE: Home Defence - 2/15/2013 6:11:08 PM   
Muttling


Posts: 1612
Joined: 9/30/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Muttling


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


3. 20 ga will fire 00ought but not as many pellets.




Cool, can you give me a link to the manufacturer that sells 20 gauge 00 buck shells? My daughter has a 20 for her home weapon and I would far prefer to give her those over No. 3 shot.

Unfortunatly no I have not been able to get them either.
try this www.luckygunner.com/
or this ammo.net/
in looking I did fnd a site that indicated (it was a chat site so take that into account) there is a better chance of problems with 00 in a 20 than a 12


I'll be honest, I was baiting you with the question.   I have heard of one and only one company who makes them, but never heard of anyone who sells them and the company does not sell direct.

I'm pretty sure that the only way to get this cartridge is to hand load it and I'm not comfortable with firing such a load as I would be worried about the shot jamming together in the barrel.  

00 buck in a 20 gauge is a very bad idea in my opinion.   There are some companies that sell No. 2 shot in 20 gauge which should be a good cartridge, but those are near impossible to find as well.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 100
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Home Defence Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109