xssve
Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: angelikaJ
quote:
ORIGINAL: master4bornslv
What is this some mamby pamby vanila site? For chist sake this sub/slave has suposedly comitted itself to serving a Master.
It has done multiple three ways before with others in the past by its own admission.
And no where does it try to say that there was any mention of discussion and/or agreement to a limit against three ways when it committing itself to its Master.
But now it is too good to submit to doing it again with some one that it's Master chooses to because it doent want to? that is Bull shit!
Most of those who talk like they agree with the slave not doing what it's Master desires sound like they want the slave for themselves, with them talking about how cute the slave is, how itis sweat and is such eye candy and is so young, and old the Master is old.
None of those things has a thing to do with ther fact that this cute, sweet, young slave volentarily chose to commit to serving this Master and is now refusing to obey his decision to try a three way to see if He likes it.
If this sub/slave believed it was too cute, sweet or young to do what the Master wants it should not have committed to serve this Master.
But it did commit itself to serve this Master and did not try to set a limit conserning not doing this service before committing itself to serve Him.
The only issue should be that the slave suposedly committed to serve the Master who simply wants the slave to do something that ithe sub/slave has done before and did not seek to set as a limit before commiting itslef to this Master.
I have to wonder who this sub/slave thinks is the Dominant in this relationship, the slave who thinks it has the right to deny its Master a simple desire that was never set as a limit , Or the Master who wants a simple service the sub/slave has given to others before?
Clearly this sub/slave is in the wrong, and should comply with what is'e Master has told it that He wants!
I am [my] Master's slave.
He would never refer to me as an "it".
That may be how you see it but to expect that all Masters and slaves share the same view is below cluelessness and is extremely disrespectful.
I am not putting down the kink of objectification; I am merely affirming that not everyone handles or views his or her relationship dynamic the same way.
We all have baggage.
My Master is well aware of mine and He does not do things that would possibly injure or harm His most Prized possession.
He takes care not to 'break His toys' as it were.
Should the OP decide that engaging in another 3-some is not for her, she is not being disobedient; she is realising a basic incompatibility. Not only is that is a perfectly valid choice, but it is her responsibility to choose partners that she is compatible with.
edit: clarity
I have to agree with AJ, as "it" has not stated what promises exactly her "master" has made to her for one thing - if he tells her one thing and does another it is a form of deception, master or no, and it is deception she is concerned about.
I mean, sure, I run into this girl on the street, assuming I have no prior commitments, I'm pretty sure I'd try to talk her into all kinds of crazy shit, she's gonna make any scene look good, but there is a line between seduction and deception, they are closely related in both theory and praxis.
You should tell it to people straight, IMO, especially if it's a deal breaker for you - she's being straight as far as I can tell, and no, it' probably won't kill her, she's either attracted to this dynamic to begin with, or she's been herded into it by sheer happenstance of culture or demographics - i.e., courted by young men still sowing their wild oats, but there are some ethical issues involved w/regards to sowing fields and then abandoning them that she is correct as a woman and a rational human being to be concerned about.
Like so much of PE, we've got an idealized linguistic/behavioral construct on one side, and the human condition on the other - it's easy to tell people they should do this or do that when it's not your ass on the line, I'm not about to play relationship enforcer to people I don't even know.
The fact that she is in here asking about it at all indicates they have some communication issues, so I'd start there.
Asserting herself here, would logically be to mention these issues to him, and seeing which one of his heads is running the show.
_____________________________
Walking nightmare...
|
RE: Master wants a threesome... - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread